Tag Archives: Ahmaud

3 men found guilty of murdering Ahmaud Arbery

A jury has returned guilty verdicts against all three defendants in the murder of Ahmaud Arbery in Brunswick, Georgia. Travis McMichael, who fired the fatal shots, was convicted on all counts, including the charge of malice murder. His father Gregory McMichael and neighbor William “Roddie” Bryan were convicted of felony murder and other charges.

Arbery, a 25-year-old Black man, was shot to death while jogging in the neighborhood in February 2020. Cellphone video showed the men chasing Arbery and cornering him with their pickup trucks before a scuffle that ended with Travis McMichael shooting Arbery at close range with a shotgun. 

As the first guilty verdict was read aloud, people in the public gallery were heard audibly gasping. Marcus Arbery, the father of Ahmaud Arbery, could be heard saying, “Long time coming,” before being told by security to leave the courtroom. Judge Timothy Walmsley reminded the courtroom to remain silent as he continued to read the rest of the jury’s verdicts aloud. [See below for a full breakdown of the charges against each defendant.]

As he stood to leave the courtroom, Travis McMichael, looking red-faced, mouthed the words “love you” to his mother. 


Special Report: Men convicted of Arbery murde…

14:17

The Associated Press reports the three men face minimum sentences of life in prison. The judge will decide whether that comes with or without the possibility of parole.

A sentencing date has yet to be scheduled.

“The verdict today was a verdict based on the facts, based on the evidence, and that was our goal, was to bring that to that jury so that they could do the right thing, because the jury system works in this country,” the lead prosecutor in the case, Linda Dunikoski, said outside the courthouse after the verdict was announced. “And when you present the truth to people and they can see it, they will do the right thing, and that’s what this jury did today in getting justice for Ahmaud Arbery.”

Ahmaud Arbery

“I never thought this day would come, but God is good,” Arbery’s mother, Wanda Cooper-Jones, said at a news conference after the verdict, adding that her son “will now rest in peace.”

The McMichaels and Bryan are also facing federal hate crimes charges. A separate trial in the federal case is scheduled to begin on February 7, 2022. 

The defense in the murder trial centered around the claim that the three men acted under the state’s citizen’s arrest law — which was in effect at the time but has since been repealed — because they were suspicious Arbery might have been involved in neighborhood burglaries. They argued they had a right of self-defense against Arbery who, one defense attorney said, “chose to fight.” 

The prosecution disputed that and argued that the three men had no legitimate reason to chase down and confront Arbery.

“All three of these defendants made assumptions — made assumptions about what was going on that day, and they made their decision to attack Ahmaud Arbery in their driveways because he was a Black man running down the street,” Dunikoski told the jury.

Though Arbery had gone inside a house under construction in the neighborhood, “nothing had ever been taken from the construction site,” Dunikoski said, and the defendants had no direct knowledge linking him to any crime when they began their pursuit.

“He was trying to get away from these strangers that were yelling at him, threatening to kill him. And then they killed him,” she said, adding that Arbery was killed “for absolutely no good reason at all.”

Left to right: Gregory McMichael, his son Travis McMichael, and William “Roddie” Bryan.

Glynn County Detention Center via AP/ WJAX


The jury was able to hear from Travis McMichael when he took the stand in his own defense. He testified that he had heard about break-ins in the neighborhood and had previously seen a Black man “lurking” and “creeping” around a house under construction.

He testified that when his father spotted Arbery on February 23, they decided to drive up alongside him and question him. As the confrontation ensued, McMichael said he was forced to make a split-second “life-or-death” decision when he said Arbery grabbed for his shotgun.

“It was the most traumatic event of my life,” he told the court.

But under cross-examination, McMichael acknowledged that Arbery was “just running” and did not threaten them.

The other two defendants did not testify at the trial.


“48 Hours” goes inside a mother’s relentless pursuit of the truth of what happened to her son in “A Promise to Ahmaud” airing Saturday at 10/9c on CBS and Paramount+.

Read original article here

Ahmaud Arbery trial: Guilty verdicts were an answer to prayers, family says. Here’s what comes next

As the first verdict was being read, Marcus Arbery Sr., Arbery’s father, “leapt up and cheered,” according to a pool reporter in the room.

“I never saw this day back in 2020, I never thought this day would come,” said Ahmaud Arbery’s mother, Wanda Cooper-Jones, as she stood just outside the courthouse doors following the verdicts.

She thanked God and all the people who marched and prayed for her family.

“Quez, which you know him as Ahmaud, I know him as Quez. He will now rest in peace,” his mother said to the crowd of people gathered, who had celebrated upon hearing the news.

“The verdict today was a verdict based on the facts, based on the evidence and that was our goal, was to bring that to that jury so that they could do the right thing,” said prosecutor Linda Dunikoski, adding, “the jury system works in this country.”

Now, questions over the sentencing, appeals process and additional federal charges for Travis McMichael, Gregory McMichael and William “Roddie” Bryan Jr. must be answered.

Trio face possibility of life in prison

Judge Timothy Walmsley has yet to set a sentencing date for the three convicted men.

The jury on Wednesday found Travis McMichael guilty of malice murder, four counts of felony murder, two counts of aggravated assault, one count of false imprisonment and one count of criminal attempt to commit a felony in Arbery’s death on February 23, 2020, just outside Brunswick, Georgia.

His father, Gregory McMichael, was acquitted only on a malice murder charge and was found guilty of the other charges faced by him and his son.

Bryan was found guilty of three counts of felony murder, one count of aggravated assault, one count of false imprisonment, and one count of criminal attempt to commit a felony. He was acquitted of malice murder, one count of felony murder, and one count of aggravated assault.

The men now face a sentence of up to life in prison without the possibility of parole on each of the murder charges, 20 years on each of the aggravated assault charges, 10 years on the false imprisonment charge, and 5 years on the criminal attempt to commit a felony charge. Walmsley will decide whether the sentences will be served consecutively or concurrently.

Prosecutors have indicated they will seek sentences of life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Defense attorneys plan to appeal

Jason Sheffield and Bob Rubin, attorneys for Travis McMichael, said they planned to appeal the conviction.

When asked about the location of the trial, Sheffield said he was sure their decision not to file for a change of venue would be discussed “ad nauseam” and could become a part of a future appeal but said they did not have any second thoughts about the decision.

“I can tell you honestly, these men are sorry for what happened to Ahmaud Arbery,” said Sheffield. “They are sorry that he is dead, they are sorry for the tragedy that happened because of the choices that they made to go out there and try to stop him.”

Kevin Gough, Bryan’s attorney, said he planned to appeal the decision regarding his client, noting, “We believe the appellate courts will reverse this conviction.”

During the trial, Gough made remarks that were widely considered insensitive, beseeching the court to prevent high-profile Black pastors from sitting in the public gallery. And one prosecutor told CNN Wednesday the decision to raise the issue may have been intentional to help with an appeal.

Gough said on November 11 he had “nothing personally against” the Rev. Al Sharpton, who was in attendance alongside Arbery’s family, adding, “We don’t want any more Black pastors coming in here or other Jesse Jackson, whoever was in here earlier this week, sitting with the victim’s family trying to influence a jury in this case.”

Walmsley ruled that as long as court proceedings were not disrupted, there would be no sweeping bans. Gough apologized for his statements the next day.
The Rev. Jesse Jackson had not made an appearance at the time of the comments, but later sat in the gallery with Arbery’s parents.

Dunikoski, the prosecutor, told CNN’s Jim Acosta after the verdict that Gough’s comments about Black pastors — though made without the jury present — were strategic.

“Mr. Gough is a very, very good attorney, and he purposefully and intentionally and strategically, I believe, did what he did in an effort to attempt to insert potentially some error into the case in case he lost the case and it went up on appeal,” she said.

Federal charges await

All three were indicted in April on separate federal hate crime charges, which include interference with rights and attempted kidnapping, according to the US Department of Justice. Travis and Gregory McMichael were also charged with using, carrying, brandishing and discharging a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence.

Federal prosecutors said all three men “used force and threats of force to intimidate and interfere with Arbery’s right to use a public street because of his race.”

The McMichaels and Bryan pleaded not guilty to the federal charges.

Sheffield and Rubin, on behalf of Travis McMichael, said after the federal indictment, “We are deeply disappointed that the Justice Department bought the false narrative that the media and state prosecutors have promulgated.”

Arbery Sr.’s attorney Ben Crump said at the time, “This is an important milestone in America’s uphill march toward racial justice, and we applaud the Justice Department for treating this heinous act for what it is — a purely evil, racially motivated hate crime.”

The federal trial is set to take place in February. Since they were being held on the state charges, there has been no federal bond hearing yet.

If convicted on the federal charges, they could face an additional penalty of up to life in prison.

CNN’s Chris Boyette, Amir Vera, Angela Barajas and Madeline Holcombe contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Prosecutors in the trial of Ahmaud Arbery’s killers explain why they had faith in the jury

Linda Dunikoski, Cobb County senior assistant district attorney, told CNN’s Jim Acosta that after jurors were selected, her team “realized that we had very, very smart, very intelligent, honest jurors who were going to do their job which is to seek the truth.”

“We felt that putting up our case, it doesn’t matter whether they were Black or White, that putting up our case that this jury would hear the truth, they would see the evidence and that they would do the right thing and come back with the correct verdict which we felt they did today,” Dunikoski said.

Nine White women, two White men and one Black man served on the jury, according to a CNN analysis of juror data. Historically, all-White juries in cases where White people are involved in the deaths of Black men result in acquittals, according to scholars and law experts who spoke to CNN about the trial of Arbery’s murderers.
The racial makeup of the jurors was reminiscent of the Jim Crow era and quickly drew comparisons with the aftermath of Emmett Till’s death, when an all-White jury in 1955 acquitted the two men arrested for Emmet’s slaying, experts said.
But unlike the trial of those two White men in 1955, the three White men in 2021 were all found guilty on multiple murder counts.
Race did play a large role in this trial, but prosecutors did not address it as much as the defense did. At one point during closing arguments Monday, Laura Hogue, one of Gregory McMichael’s lawyers, prompted outrage in the courtroom for bringing up Arbery’s toenails.

“Turning Ahmaud Arbery into a victim after the choices that he made does not reflect the reality of what brought Ahmaud Arbery to Satilla Shores in his khaki shorts with no socks to cover his long, dirty toenails,” Hogue told jurors.

Larissa Ollivierre, Cobb County assistant district attorney, told CNN Wednesday she felt bad for Arbery’s parents after Hogue’s statements.

“I think the comments were unnecessary and they were low, and I just feel bad that Ahmaud’s mom and dad had to sit there and listen to all of those things,” Ollivierre said.

And then there were the comments by Kevin Gough, attorney for William “Roddie” Bryan, who repeatedly objected to nationally recognized civil rights leaders presence at the trial to support Arbery’s family.

“We don’t want any more Black pastors coming in here … sitting with the victim’s family trying to influence a jury in this case,” he said.

Dunikoski said Gough’s comments about Black pastors — though made without the jury present — were strategic.

“Mr. Gough is a very, very good attorney, and he purposefully and intentionally and strategically, I believe, did what he did in an effort to attempt to insert potentially some error into the case in case he lost the case and it went up on appeal,” she said.

Even though race played a huge role in and outside of the courtroom, Dunikoski said she hoped what people took away from this trial was that parents in a similar situation would trust the process and advocate for their child.

“Wanda Cooper-Jones and Marcus Arbery (Arbery’s mother and father) were advocates for Ahmaud, and they really pushed this one when it first happened,” she said. “And I think the message is that you have to let the criminal justice system work and, in this case, yes, it did work, and to trust, which they did, they trusted us, and they trusted this team to bring justice for them and their family, but to trust the system of the constitution and due process just to let it work.”

CNN’s Christina Maxouris, Travis Caldwell, Eliott C. McLaughlin, Devon M. Sayers, Alta Spells, Steve Almasy, Nicole Chavez and Brandon Tensley contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Ahmaud Arbery trial and verdict news

Paul Camarillo, Linda Dunikoski and Larissa Ollivierre (CNN)

The jury in the trial of three men for the death of Ahmed Arbery was made up of 11 White people and one Black person, but prosecutors told CNN that they felt that when the jury heard their arguments, they would make the decision to find all three guilty, which they did.

“I was hopeful based on the evidence that we presented in the case that we put forth that the jury would see the truth of what actually took place and bring justice for the Arbery family,” Cobb County senior assistant district attorney Linda Dunikoski said. “After we picked the jury, we looked at them and realized that we had very, very smart, very intelligent, honest jurors who were going to do their job which is to seek the truth. And so, we felt that putting up our case, it doesn’t matter whether they were black or white, that putting up our case that this jury would hear the truth, they would see the evidence and that they would do the right thing and come back with the correct verdict which we felt they did today.”

One main goal for prosecutors Paul Camarillo, Cobb County senior assistant district attorney, said was to simply show that the defendant’s claim of self-defense, simply wasn’t a viable argument.

“We had to show that it did not apply in this case and if they could not get past that hurdle, they never could get to self-defense,” Camarillo said.

Larissa Ollivierre, Cobb County assistant district attorney, said she felt bad for Arbery’s parents when one defense attorney began talking about Arbery’s toenails.

“I think the comments were unnecessary and they were low. and I just feel bad that Ahmad’s mom dad and had to sit there and listen to all of those things,” Ollivierre said.

Dunikoski said defense attorney Kevin Gough’s comments about Black pastors– though made without the jury present — was strategic.

“Mr. Gough is a very, very good attorney, and he purposefully and intentionally and strategically, I believe, did what did he in an effort to attempt to insert potentially some error into the case in case he lost the case and it went up on appeal,” she said

Read original article here

Three Men Found Guilty of Murdering Ahmaud Arbery: Live Updates

BRUNSWICK, Ga. — Three white men were found guilty of murder and other charges on Wednesday for the pursuit and fatal shooting of Ahmaud Arbery, a 25-year-old Black man, in a case that, together with the killing of George Floyd, helped inspire the racial justice protests of last year.

The three defendants — Travis McMichael, 35; his father, Gregory McMichael, 65; and their neighbor William Bryan, 52 — face sentences of up to life in prison for the state crimes. The men have also been indicted on separate federal charges, including hate crimes and attempted kidnapping, and are expected to stand trial in February on those charges.

Credit…Pool photo by Stephen B. Morton, Sean Rayford, and Elijah Nouvelage

The verdict suggested that the jury agreed with prosecutors’ arguments that Mr. Arbery posed no imminent threat to the men and that the men had no reason to believe he had committed a crime, giving them no legal right to chase him through their suburban neighborhood. “You can’t start it and claim self-defense,” the lead prosecutor argued in her closing statements. “And they started this.”

Though the killing of Mr. Arbery in February 2020 did not reach the same level of notoriety as the case of Mr. Floyd, the Black man murdered by a white Minneapolis police officer three months later, Mr. Arbery’s death helped fuel widespread demonstrations and unrest that unfolded in cities across the country in the spring and summer of 2020.

The case touched on some of the most combustible themes in American criminal justice, including vigilantism, self-defense laws, the effects of widespread gun ownership and the role of race in jury selection.

Like many other recent episodes involving the killing of Black people, the confrontation was captured on video that was eventually made public. Unlike many of the others, the video was made not by a bystander but by one of the defendants, Mr. Bryan.

From the beginning, Mr. Arbery’s family and friends raised questions about local officials’ handling of the case. The three men who were later charged walked free for several weeks after the shooting, and were arrested only after the video was released, a national outcry swelled and the case was taken over by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation.

Jackie Johnson, the local prosecutor who initially handled the case, lost her bid for re-election in 2020 and was indicted this year by a Georgia grand jury, accused of “showing favor and affection” to Gregory McMichael, a former investigator in her office, and for directing police officers not to arrest Travis McMichael. The case was ultimately tried by the district attorney’s office in Cobb County, which is roughly 300 miles away from Brunswick in metropolitan Atlanta.

The case brought political and legal upheaval. Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican, signed a hate-crimes statute into law, and sided with state lawmakers when they voted to repeal significant portions of the state’s citizen’s arrest statute.

During the trial, defense lawyers relied on that citizen’s arrest law, which was enacted in the 19th century. They argued that their clients had acted legally when, on a sunny Sunday afternoon in February 2020, they set out in two pickup trucks in an effort to detain Mr. Arbery, an avid jogger and former high school football player who spent nearly five minutes trying to run away from them.

Eventually trapped between the two pickup trucks, Mr. Arbery ended up in a confrontation with Travis McMichael, who was armed with a shotgun and fired at Mr. Arbery three times at close range. Mr. McMichael testified that he feared that Mr. Arbery, who had no weapon, would get control of the shotgun from him and threaten his life.

Over the 10 days of testimony in the trial, prosecutors challenged the idea that an unarmed man who never spoke to his pursuers could be considered much of a threat at all.

“What’s Mr. Arbery doing?” Linda Dunikoski, the lead prosecutor said in her closing statement. “He runs away from them. And runs away from them. And runs away from them.”

The verdict, read aloud in a packed, windowless courtroom in the Glynn County Courthouse, came at a time when Americans were already divided over the acquittal, a few days earlier, of Kyle Rittenhouse. Mr. Rittenhouse, who asserted that he was acting in self-defense, fatally shot two men and wounded another during protests and violence that broke out after a white police officer shot a Black man in Kenosha, Wis.

Before the verdict in the Georgia case, some observers worried that the racial makeup of the jury — which included 11 white people and one Black person — would skew justice in the defendants’ favor.

Superior Court Judge Timothy R. Walmsley oversaw the proceedings. When he approved the selection of the nearly all-white jury, he noted that there was an appearance of “intentional discrimination” at play, but he said that defense lawyers had given legitimate reasons unrelated to race when they moved to exclude eight Black potential jurors in the final stages of the selection process.

Before the verdict, Wanda Cooper-Jones, Mr. Arbery’s mother, said she had faith in the power of the facts that the jurors were shown. “I’m very confident that they’ll make the right decision once they see all of the evidence,” she said.

Mr. Arbery’s family said he was out jogging on the day of his death, but defense lawyers said no evidence had emerged to show that Mr. Arbery jogged that day into the defendants’ neighborhood of Satilla Shores, just outside of Brunswick, a small coastal city.

Video footage showed Mr. Arbery, dressed in shorts and a T-shirt, walking into a partially built house in the neighborhood shortly before he was killed. It was a house he had walked into numerous times before. Each time, surveillance video showed him wandering around the property, but not taking or damaging anything. The owner of the house told police that items had been stolen from a boat that was sometimes stored on the property, though he was not sure the boat was there when the thefts occurred.

General concerns about property crime in Satilla Shores were widespread in early 2020, residents testified at the trial.

Travis McMichael told the police that he had seen Mr. Arbery outside the partially built house one evening 12 days before the shooting. During that encounter, Mr. McMichael said, Mr. Arbery put his hands in his waistband, as if reaching for a gun. Mr. McMichael called 911 that evening. Mr. Arbery ran away.

On the day of the shooting, a neighbor across the street saw Mr. Arbery in the house and called the police. Mr. Arbery left the house soon after, and ran down the street. Gregory McMichael spotted him and, along with his son, jumped into a truck and gave chase. Moments later, the third defendant, Mr. Bryan, began chasing Mr. Arbery as well.

At the trial, defense lawyers sought to show that the men were acting that day out of a “duty and responsibility” to detain a man whom they felt they had reasonable grounds to believe was a burglar, as Robert Rubin, a lawyer for Travis McMichael, put it. In her closing argument, Laura D. Hogue, a lawyer for Gregory McMichael, noted that Mr. Arbery had been on the property before and said he had become “a recurring nighttime intruder — and that is frightening, and unsettling.”

Travis McMichael was the only defendant to take the stand. He told the court he took his shotgun out during the pursuit because his U.S. Coast Guard training had taught him that showing a weapon could de-escalate a potentially violent situation.

He testified that he believed he had little choice but to shoot Mr. Arbery once they clashed. “It was obvious that he was attacking me, that if he would have gotten the shotgun from me, then this was a life or death situation,” he said. “So I shot.”

In her final arguments, the lead prosecutor, Linda Dunikoski, pushed back against the idea that an unarmed man running down the street would constitute a threat to three men, two of whom were armed, in a pair of pickup trucks.

The men launched their attack on Mr. Arbery, she said, “because he was a Black man running down the street.”

During the trial, influential civil rights leaders including the Rev. Al Sharpton and the Rev. Jesse Jackson appeared in the public gallery of the courtroom with members of Mr. Arbery’s family. Kevin Gough, a lawyer for Mr. Bryan, tried repeatedly to persuade Superior Court Judge Timothy R. Walmsley to bar “Black pastors” from attending the trial, arguing that their presence was unduly influencing the jury.

The comments sparked widespread outrage, culminating with a large demonstration outside the courthouse by activists including Martin Luther King III, son and namesake of the nation’s most revered civil rights leader.

Read original article here

Ahmaud Arbery killing trial: Jury reviews video and 911 call from shooting amid deliberations

Roughly 90 minutes into Wednesday’s proceedings, the jury requested to review two video clips, one of them enhanced, from the scene of the February 23, 2020, fatal shooting, as well as the audio of Gregory McMichael’s 911 call that day. They watched each video snippet three times and listened to the 911 audio once before returning to the jury room.

The jury took a short lunch break before resuming deliberations just before 1 p.m. ET.

Deliberations come after eight days of testimony, involving 23 witnesses. The jury reviewed the case for more than six hours Tuesday after the prosecution presented a rebuttal to the defense’s closing arguments.

Three men — Travis McMichael, his father Gregory McMichael, and neighbor William “Roddie” Bryan Jr. — are standing trial on charges related to the shooting of Arbery in the Satilla Shores neighborhood outside Brunswick, Georgia, on February 23, 2020.

Each of the defendants face nine separate charges, including malice and felony murder, aggravated assault, false imprisonment and criminal attempt to commit a felony. If the jury finds Bryan not guilty of a second aggravated assault charge, they can consider three lesser misdemeanor charges for simple assault, reckless conduct, or reckless driving.

The defendants have pleaded not guilty to all charges. The McMichaels claim they were conducting a citizen’s arrest after suspecting Arbery of burglary of a nearby home under construction, and that Travis McMichael acted in self-defense by shooting Arbery. Bryan maintains he is innocent of any wrongdoing.

If jury deliberations continue past Wednesday, court will adjourn for the Thanksgiving holiday and deliberations may resume Friday and Saturday if needed.

Authorities are preparing for all possible outcomes following a verdict in terms of public reaction, which has been keyed in on a trial that consistently revolved around issues of self-defense and race.

“We plan for the worst, but we hope for the best. But we’re trying to come up with contingencies for many different scenarios that could unfold as a result of the verdict,” said Glynn County Police Department Captain Jeremiah Bergquist, who also heads the local task force unit overseeing public safety during the trial.

Prosecution gave rebuttal Tuesday

Attorneys for each of the three defendants offered different arguments Monday for why their clients were not guilty.

Alongside Travis McMichael’s central argument of self-defense, Gregory McMichael’s attorney Laura Hogue repeatedly claimed that Arbery was a habitual trespasser in the area, and said jurors should consider that Gregory McMichael had proper reasonable suspicion of Arbery to act.

Kevin Gough, an attorney for Bryan, said Bryan was more of a witness than anything else and that his video showing the shooting enabled the case to move forward.

Tuesday brought a rebuttal from lead prosecutor Linda Dunikoski, who emphasized to the jury that the men acted on suspicions alone and had no evidence Arbery had committed a crime. Travis McMichael also had inconsistencies from testimony in court when compared to statements made to police right after the shooting, she added.

Dunikoski said all three men were culpable of the charges faced because they could have de-escalated the situation by calling police or not chasing Arbery. Instead, she argued, the men committed aggravated assault with their trucks when chasing and trying to falsely imprison Arbery, leading to the moment Travis McMichael shot and killed Arbery.

“If you take that out, would he be alive?” she asked the jury of Arbery. “It’s real simple. The answer is you can’t take out any of these crimes. If you take out any one of these crimes that they committed and he’s still alive. All of the underlying felonies played a substantial and necessary part in causing the death of Ahmaud Arbery.”

Wanda Cooper-Jones, Arbery’s mother, said Tuesday after court proceedings that Dunikoski “did a fantastic job” in her final rebuttal.

“She presented the evidence again very well. I do think that we will come back with a guilty verdict, and I want to leave with this: God has brought us this far, and he’s not going to fail us now. We will get justice for Ahmaud,” she told reporters.

Marcus Arbery Sr., Arbery’s father, said what he saw in the courtroom was “devastating,” but also expressed confidence in getting a guilty verdict.

After the jury started to deliberate, Travis McMichael’s attorney, Jason Sheffield said, “I feel very confident in the case that we have put forward. I feel very confident in the evidence of Travis’ innocence,” adding “we will accept the verdict whatever it is.”

Makeup of jury was source of contention

Nine White women, two White men and one Black man are serving on the trial jury, with two White women and one White man serving as jury alternates, according to a CNN analysis of juror data.

Only having one Black juror has been a key complaint from prosecutors and Arbery’s family, as Glynn County’s population is about 69% White and 26% Black, according to 2019 data from the US Census Bureau. Arbery was Black and the defendants are White.

The 12-member trial jury and three alternates were selected after a protracted jury selection process that lasted two and a half weeks and included summoning 1,000 prospective jurors from the South Georgia coastal community. Of those summoned, less than half showed up.
The makeup of the jury was challenged by the state at the conclusion of the jury selection process. Dunikoski claimed defense attorneys disproportionately struck qualified Black jurors and based some of their strikes on race.
Judge Timothy Walmsley said, “This court has found that there appears to be intentional discrimination,” but ruled that the case could go forward with the selected jurors because the defense was able to provide valid reasons, beyond race, for why the other Black jurors were dismissed.
Defense attorneys also took issue with there being fewer older White men without college degrees in the juror pool, saying the demographic was underrepresented.

CNN’s Eliott C. McLaughlin, Angela Barajas, Adrienne Vogt and Jade Gordon contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Laura Hogue: Defense lawyer prompts outrage for bringing up Ahmaud Arbery’s toenails in closing arguments

The defense attorneys for Gregory and Travis McMichael, who are charged with Arbery’s murder, repeatedly have tried to present Arbery as a criminal. On Monday, Laura Hogue, one of Gregory McMichael’s lawyers, went further.

“Turning Ahmaud Arbery into a victim after the choices that he made does not reflect the reality of what brought Ahmaud Arbery to Satilla Shores in his khaki shorts with no socks to cover his long, dirty toenails,” Hogue told jurors.

Arbery was Black. The three defendants, who also include William “Roddie” Bryan, are White and face charges including malice and felony murder in the killing of Arbery after chasing him in a neighborhood near Brunswick, Georgia, on February 23, 2020. They have pleaded not guilty.

Arbery’s mother, Wanda Cooper-Jones, got up and left the courtroom after Hogue’s remark, saying “I gotta get out of here.”

Later Monday, she told CNN that the comment was very disturbing.

“I thought it was very, very rude to talk about his long, dirty toenails and to totally neglect that my son had a huge hole in his chest when he was shot with that shotgun,” she said.

The defense is just trying to deflect from the fact that they “don’t have the proper evidence to get a conviction,” Cooper-Jones said.

“So they’re actually going to any measure to get it, to get a conviction, which is not there for them,” she said.

Legal pundit says comment used racist tropes

Legal experts took exception to Hogues’ comment.

In that moment, Hogue took the opportunity to portray Arbery as a “runaway slave,” said Charles Coleman Jr., a civil rights attorney and former prosecutor.

“Her word choice was intentional, her descriptions were unnecessary. And the description ultimately is inflammatory,” Coleman told CNN’s Pam Brown on “The Lead with Jake Tapper.”

It was an “attempt to sort of really trigger some of the racial tropes and stereotypes that may be deeply embedded in the psyche of some of the jurors,” Coleman told Brown.

Glynn County, where the trial is being held, is made up of 69% White residents and 27% Black. Just one of the 12 jurors is Black.

“It was disrespectful, it was horrific, and attorney Hogue should be ashamed of herself, to bring up his feet in the middle of trial. What is wrong with you?,” said civil rights attorney L. Chris Stewart.

“Not only disrespecting Ahmaud, but you know his mother’s right there. It was horrific,” Stewart said.

Hogue’s comment appears to be based on the autopsy of Arbery’s body by the forensic sciences division of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, which states that “the toenails are long and very dirty.”

Former prosecutor Mark Eiglarsh said Hogue had the pulse of the jury.

“I did find the defense lawyer’s comments, personally, extremely offensive,” Eiglarsh told Brown. “That said, I’m going to defend her right to make it, because her job is to do everything that she can to get an acquittal, as long as it’s within the confines of what the law allows.”

“As outrageous and offensive as I found it personally, I know that she wouldn’t have made it if she didn’t think it would resonate with those particular jurors,” Eiglarsh said. “And that’s what she did.”

Monday’s closing statements by the defense attorneys follow 10 days of proceedings and testimony from 23 witnesses.

On Tuesday, prosecutor Linda Dunikoski will give her rebuttal.

Read original article here

Ahmaud Arbery death trial live updates: Closing arguments begin

Arbery was fatally shot on Feb. 23, 2020, in Satilla Shores, Georgia.

A jury is expected to begin deliberating the fates of three white Georgia men charged in the fatal shooting of Ahmaud Arbery after first hearing final arguments on Monday that the 25-year-old Black man was either “hunted down” and murdered or was killed in self-defense when he resisted a citizens’ arrest.

The radically different theories based on the same evidence are being laid out in closing arguments on Monday in Glynn County Superior Court in Brunswick, Georgia. The closing arguments are expected to take all day as the prosecutor and attorneys for the three defendants are each expected to speak to the jury.

The jury is expected to begin deliberations on Tuesday morning.

Travis McMichael, the 35-year-old U.S. Coast Guard veteran; his father, Gregory McMichael, 65, a retired Glynn County police officer, and their neighbor, William “Roddie” Bryan, 53, each face maximum sentences of life in prison if convicted on all the charges.

The defendants have pleaded not guilty to a nine-count state indictment that includes malice murder, multiple charges of felony murder, false imprisonment, aggravated assault with a 12-gauge shotgun and aggravated assault with their pickup trucks.

The McMichaels and Bryan were also indicted on federal hate crime charges in April and have all pleaded not guilty.

Read original article here

Closing arguments in trial for Ahmaud Arbery’s killing focus on citizens’ arrest law and claim of self-defense

Laura D. Hogue, who represents Gregory McMichael, began her closing argument after the lunch break. She spoke about how residents understandably want to protect the safety and security of their neighborhoods. 

“Greg McMichael was absolutely certain” he’d seen an intruder, she said.

“Certainty, though, is way higher standard than what you need to find in this case,” Hogue told the jury. “Certainty was way more knowledge than they needed to detain Ahmaud Arbery to execute a citizen’s arrest.”

She added that there are no “magic words” or signage that a person has to say or post in order to execute a citizen’s arrest in Georgia, under the law that was in effect at the time. “It’s your place and people should stay off it. We don’t need to be telling people ahead of time and giving them warnings,” Hogue explained to the jury.

Hogue recounted the evidence that Arbery had walked into a house that was under construction, and reminded the jury that the law states that nothing needs to have been taken from a property in order for a burglary to have been committed. Hogue doubles down, telling the jury, “Every single time Ahmuad Arbery goes into that house he is committing a burglary.”

Hogue used phrases like “hightailing it” and “hauling ass” to describe to the jury Arbery trying to run away from the McMichaels. 

“No verdict can change the grief of that future not realized,” Hogue said of Arbery’s untimely death. “His teenage years were full of promise, but his early twenties just led him in the wrong direction.”

She disputed the state’s characterization of Arbery as a “victim” in this case, and pointed the jury to the choices he made that brought him to the Satilla Shores neighborhood on those three occasions. Hogue said Arbery “was not an innocent victim.”

“There was no legitimate reason for Ahmaud Arbery to be plundering” through the construction site, she continued. “He was a recurring nighttime intruder, and that is frightening and unsettling.”

“No one is saying that Ahmaud Arbery deserved to die,” Hogue told the jury. “He died because for whatever inexplicable, illogical reason, instead of staying where he was, whatever overwhelming reason he had to avoid being captured that day and arrested by police, he chose to fight. He chose to fight.”

Greg McMichael, center, sits with his attorney, Laura D. Hogue, left, before the start of closing arguments on November 22, 2021 in Brunswick, Georgia. His son Travis McMichael sits at right. The McMichaels and a neighbor, William “Roddie” Bryan, are charged with the February 2020 fatal shooting of 25-year-old Ahmaud Arbery.

Stephen B. Morton / Getty Images


“Greg McMichael is not a murderer, he is not guilty,” Hogue said.

The court is now taking a brief break, after which the jury will hear from the attorney representing William “Roddie” Bryan.

Read original article here

What we learned from testimony in the trial over Ahmaud Arbery’s killing

Travis McMichael said he was attacked by Arbery

The younger McMichael took the stand as the defense’s first witness and told the court he felt he was in a “life or death situation” when he shot Arbery.

Early in his testimony, he said there was a rising level of crime, including vehicle break-ins, in the neighborhood where he lived with his parents in the 18 months leading up to Arbery’s killing there.

Other residents testified they were aware of petty crime incidents in the neighborhood. One said those started more than 15 years ago. Another neighbor, Sube Lawrence, said she kept up with crime on a neighborhood Facebook page and a neighbor would alert her if there was a “suspicious person lurking” at the nearby home under construction, so Lawrence could get her children inside.

Travis McMichael testified that on February 11, 2020, he saw someone ‘”creeping through the shadows” in the neighborhood, got out of his truck, and confronted a Black male, who he said seemed to reach into his pocket. Travis McMichael assumed the man was armed, jumped back in his vehicle and the person ran to the house under construction, he testified. The younger McMichael said he called the police and went back to the home with his father. Authorities never saw, talked to, or caught the person he said he saw that night, he testified.

On the day of the shooting, the elder McMichael came in their home and said, “the guy that has been breaking in down the road just ran by the house, something’s happened,” Travis McMichael testified.

The father and son got in their truck and eventually caught up to Arbery, who was running in the neighborhood, and Travis McMichael made at least two attempts to talk to him while still in their vehicle. He testified Arbery did not speak to him, but took off running again once Travis McMichael mentioned police were coming.

The younger McMichael testified about the path they took through the neighborhood as they kept up with Arbery, adding at one point he noticed another truck near Arbery, and saw the runner seemingly “grabbing” the vehicle. Prosecutors contend Bryan, the third defendant, got in his truck and joined the pursuit without knowing what was going on and struck Arbery with his vehicle.

Under questioning from prosecutor Linda Dunikoski, the defendant acknowledged he never saw Arbery armed during the pursuit, never heard Arbery verbally threaten him and Arbery never responded or showed any interest in conversing with McMichael.

By the end of the pursuit, and after Travis McMichael got out and pointed his weapon at Arbery as the latter ran in his direction, he testified he made it to the front of his truck, where he first made contact with Arbery. Travis McMichael testified Arbery grabbed the shotgun and struck him.

“I shot him,” he told the court. “He had my gun, he struck me, it was obvious … that he was attacking me, that if he would have gotten the shotgun from me, then it was a life or death situation.”

Investigators share what defendants said in interviews after shooting

Detective Parker Marcy, a Glynn County Police Department, testified Gregory McMichael told him he never saw Arbery commit a crime.

The detective read a transcript of an interview he conducted with the elder McMichael after the shooting, in which he quoted him as saying he had seen videos of the home under construction and saw a person who appeared to be Arbery “breaking into, or being, or wandering around” the site, adding the house had no doors or windows for “well over a year.”

“I don’t think the guy has actually stolen anything out of there or if he did, it was early in this process,” the detective quoted McMichael as saying. The detective testified Gregory McMichael told him he used his son’s phone during the pursuit on the day of the shooting to call 911 and said if Arbery had stopped running they planned to hold him, but he didn’t use the words “arrest,” “citizen’s arrest” or “detain,” or say what Arbery would be arrested for.

Glynn County police officer Jeff Brandeberry, who also interviewed Gregory McMichael, said the latter never used the words “arrest,” “detain” or “trespass” when they spoke at the scene of the shooting.

Roderic Nohilly, a police sergeant in Georgia’s Glynn County, also testified Gregory McMichael did not know during police interviews whether Arbery had committed a crime prior to their pursuit of him.

Homeowner said he didn’t ask McMichaels to secure site

Central to the case has been a home under construction in the Satilla Shores neighborhood, which residents had allegedly grown worried over people entering. One resident testified she saw a “very tall” Black man standing in the doorway of the home sometime in late 2019 or early 2020. For a long time, the house had no doors or windows, witnesses testified.

The owner of the home, Larry English Jr., testified in a September 24 deposition (he previously told the court a serious medical condition prevented him from testifying in person) surveillance footage at his property captured people several times in late 2019 and early 2020, and in some cases, he called 911.

English testified he called authorities in October 2019 to report an individual he described as “a colored guy” with curly hair and tattoos who was “pondering around.” He called again in November 2019 when he saw a White couple entering his property, telling police “We had … some stuff stolen about a week and a half, two weeks ago there.” He called authorities a day later and said he saw at the construction site the “same guy that was over there about a week and a half, two weeks ago.”

English was asked whether anything was ever taken from his construction site, to which he responded, “Not that I know of.”

He testified he never authorized the McMichaels to confront anyone on his site. He said while he did not post the surveillance footage on social media, he may have shown it to Matt Albenze, a resident of the neighborhood.

Albenze testified during the trial that on the day of the shooting, he called police from his home after noticing Arbery “standing there, looking around” the yard of the home under construction, saying the man in the yard made him think of the video English showed him.

He said he went in his home to retrieve his firearm and phone, called the non-emergency police line, and when he went back outside, he could see Arbery in the under-construction home but could not see what he was doing.

He testified Arbery then took off, and Albenze went inside his home without talking to anyone else. He said he heard gunshots a few minutes later.

Bryan told agent he had ‘instinct’ Arbery did something wrong

Bryan’s attorney, Kevin Gough, said during a delayed opening statement his client joined the pursuit with no intent to harm Arbery and he did not try to assault the runner with his vehicle. The attorney pointed to surveillance video showing Bryan on his front porch when he noticed Arbery running by, with the McMichaels chasing, saying Bryan calmly walked inside his home and retrieved his cell phone and vehicle keys, not his rifle.

Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) Assistant Special Agent in Charge Jason Seacrist testified earlier in the trial Bryan told him during a May 2020 interview he was on his porch when the sound of someone running and a vehicle engine caught his attention.

Bryan told the agent he said, “You got him? You need help?” and then grabbed his keys to go see what was going on and if he could help, according to an interview transcript read by the agent.

Bryan said he tried to slow down Arbery during the chase to get a picture of him, so “something would happen in the end other than just him getting away and cops not knowing who he was.”

Seacrist testified he asked Bryan why police would need to know who Arbery was.

“Because I figured he had done something wrong,” Bryan responded. The agent asked Bryan what made him think Arbery had done something wrong.

“It was just instinct man, I don’t know,” Bryan said, according to the interview transcript. “I figured he stole something,” he later added.

CNN’s Devon M. Sayers and Alta Spells contributed to this report.

Read original article here