Tag Archives: aerosol

High-powered lasers illuminate toilets spewing invisible aerosol plumes with every flush

John Crimaldi is a professor of civil, environmental and architectural engineering at the University of Colorado, Boulder.


Every time you flush a toilet, it releases plumes of tiny water droplets into the air around you. These droplets, called aerosol plumes, can spread pathogens from human waste and expose people in public restrooms to contagious diseases.

Scientific understanding of the spread of aerosol plumes – and public awareness of their existence – has been hampered by the fact that they are normally invisible. My colleagues Aaron True, Karl Linden, Mark Hernandez, Lars Larson and Anna Pauls and I were able to use high-power lasers to illuminate these plumes, enabling us to image and measure the location and motion of spreading aerosol plumes from flushing commercial toilets in vivid detail.

Aerosol plumes from commercial toilets can rise 5 feet above the bowl. 

John Crimaldi/Scientific Reports, CC BY-NC-ND


Going up instead of down

Toilets are designed to efficiently empty the contents inside the bowl through a downward motion into the drain pipe. In the flush cycle, water comes into forceful contact with the contents inside the bowl and creates a fine spray of particles suspended in air.

We found that a typical commercial toilet generates a strong upward jet of air with velocities exceeding 6.6 feet per second (2 meters per second), rapidly carrying these particles up to 5 feet (1.5 meters) above the bowl within eight seconds of the start of the flush.

To visualize these plumes, we set up a typical lidless commercial toilet with a flushometer-style valve found throughout North America in our lab. Flushometer valves use pressure instead of gravity to direct water into the bowl. We used special optics to create a thin vertical sheet of laser light that illuminated the region from the top of the bowl to the ceiling. After flushing the toilet with a remote electrical trigger, the aerosol particles scatter enough laser light to become visible, allowing us to use cameras to image the plume of particles.

Even though we expected to see these particles, we were still surprised by the strength of the jet ejecting the particles from the bowl.

A related study used a computational model of an idealized toilet to predict the formation of aerosol plumes, with an upward transport of particles at speeds above the bowl approaching 3.3 feet per second (1 meter per second), which is about half of what we observed with a real toilet.


Using lasers to visualize invisible toilet plumes by
The Conversation on
YouTube

Why lasers?

Scientists have known for decades that flushing toilets can release aerosol particles into the air. However, experimental studies have largely relied on devices that sampled the air at fixed locations to determine the number and size of particles toilets produce.

Water streams forcefully into the toilet bowl during a flush cycle. 

SouthHamsian/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-NC-SA


While these earlier approaches can confirm the presence of aerosols, they provide little information about the physics of the plumes: what they look like, how they spread and how fast they move. This information is critical to develop strategies to mitigate the formation of aerosol plumes and reduce their capacity to transmit disease.

As an engineering professor whose research focuses on interactions between fluid physics and ecological or biological processes, my laboratory specializes in using lasers to determine how various things are transported by complex fluid flows. In many cases, these things are invisible until we illuminate them with lasers.

An advantage of using laser light to measure fluid flows is that, unlike a physical probe, light does not alter or disrupt the very thing you are trying to measure. Furthermore, using lasers to make invisible things visible helps people, as visual creatures, better understand complexities in the fluid environment they live in.

Aerosols and disease

Aerosol particles containing pathogens are important human disease vectors. Smaller particles that remain suspended in air for a period of time can expose people to respiratory diseases like influenza and COVID-19 through inhalation. Larger particles that settle quickly on surfaces can spread intestinal diseases like norovirus through contact with the hands and mouth.

Toilet bowl water contaminated by feces can have pathogen concentrations that persist after dozens of flushes. But it is still an open question as to whether toilet aerosol plumes present a transmission risk.

While we were able visually and quantitatively to describe how aerosol plumes move and disperse, our work does not directly address how toilet plumes transmit disease, and this remains an ongoing aspect of research.


Visualizing usually invisible toilet plumes in the lab with lasers by
The Conversation on
YouTube

Limiting toilet plume spread

Our experimental methodology provides a foundation for future work to test a range of strategies to minimize the risk of exposure to diseases from flushing toilets. This could include assessing changes to aerosol plumes emanating from new toilet bowl designs or flush valves that change the duration or intensity of the flush cycle.

Meanwhile, there are ways to reduce human exposure to toilet plumes. An obvious strategy is to close the lid prior to flushing. However, this does not completely eliminate aerosol plumes, and many toilets in public, commercial and health care settings do not have lids. Ventilation or UV disinfection systems could also mitigate exposure to aerosol plumes in the bathroom.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Read original article here

Aerosol products at higher risk for benzene, says scientist who spurred recalls

Unilever is recalling dry shampoo aerosol products sold nationwide because they may contain elevated levels of benzene, a human carcinogen. The recall is the latest of half a dozen so far this year, with the cancer-causing chemical showing up in products including deodorant, hand sanitizer and sunscreen.

People should take the benzene-related recalls seriously, as they involve a far more dangerous contaminant than most, according to David Light, CEO of Valisure, an independent lab in New Haven, Connecticut, that alerted the Food and Drug Administration to its findings of benzene in sunscreen sprays last year. 

“Benzene is such a bad molecule — it’s at the very top of the FDA’s list of 70-some solvents not to use,” Light told CBS MoneyWatch, adding that unlike with some chemicals, “there’s no argument about whether or not it causes cancer in human beings.”

That’s not to say anyone who has used one of the recalled products will get cancer, emphasized Light, a biotech entrepreneur and scientist. Still, “Benzene should not be confused with a lot of other areas of concern. This is a very problematic compound, and it shouldn’t be ignored,” he said. 

“Even small amounts constitute big action,” added Light, citing the global recall that ensued after benzene was found in bottles of Perrier mineral water more than three decades ago. 

Aerosol-type products are more at risk of containing benzene than the general sphere of consumer products, as are petroleum-derived products such as gels, lotions, creams and sunscreens, said Light.

The chemical is not an ingredient in any of the recalled products, but likely came as the result of other petroleum products such as butane, which if not refined properly can end up containing other components like benzene, Light explained.

“Unfortunately the more we looked, the more we found,” he said of Valisure’s tests, which late last year petitioned the FDA for product recalls after it detected benzene in 54% of the 108 batches from 30 brands of body spray products.  

The latest recall includes dry shampoo aerosol products made before October 2021 from brands Dove, Nexxus, Suave, TIGI (Rockaholic and Bed Head), and TRESemmé, the company said in a notice published last week by the FDA. (See here for a complete list of recalled products and UPC codes.)

An internal probe by Unilever identified the propellant as the source, and the company worked with its propellant suppliers to address the issue, it stated. 

People who purchased the affected aerosol dry shampoo products should stop using them and visit UnileverRecall.com for reimbursement instructions. 

Photo of some products recalled by Unilever.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration


The recall is the second this year for Unilever involving a product possibly containing benzene. The conglomerate sells roughly 400 products around the globe, from Ben & Jerry’s ice cream to Hellmann’s mayonnaise.

Exposure to benzene can result in cancers including leukemia and blood cancer of the blood marrow, as well as life-threatening blood disorders. Daily exposure to benzene in the recalled products at the levels detected in testing “would not be expected to cause adverse health consequences,” Unilever said.

Commonly found chemical

One of the most commonly made chemicals in the U.S., benzene is present in gasoline and cigarette smoke, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. People are most typically exposed by breathing the chemical in the air, but they can also absorb it into their bodies by touching petroleum products, or by eating or drinking contaminated food or beverages. 

Unilever in late March recalled two Suave 24-hour protection aerosol antiperspirants after an internal review found slightly elevated levels of benzene in some samples. 

Four other companies have recalled products this year after finding benzene in samples, and more than half a dozen recalls came for the same reason last year

In December, for instance, Procter & Gamble recalled aerosol dry shampoo and conditioner spray products from six brands sold nationwide after finding benzene in some of them. 

But benzene is not the only cancer-causing chemical raising concern for users and makers of personal-care products. 

A lawsuit filed Friday against L’Oreal alleges that chemicals in the French company’s hair straighteners caused a woman’s uterine cancer. The suit over “phthalates and other endocrine disrupting chemicals” came days after a study linking the use of such products to uterine cancer.

L’Oreal did not respond to a request for comment.

Read original article here

Deodorant recall 2021: Procter & Gamble voluntary recalls specific Old Spice, Secret aerosol spray antiperspirant products

Procter and Gamble is recalling 18 Old Spice and secret products because of a cancer-causing chemical.

The aerosol antiperspirants were sold in stores nationwide and online.

The FDA said the products may have benzene, which is known to lead to blood cancers and other blood disorders.

There have been no reports of adverse effects from the products.
The affected products are used as antiperspirant spray products and are packaged in aerosol cans. See below for Product names and UPC codes and further descriptions.

UPC: Description

037000728870: Old Spice Sweat Defense Pure Sport Plus Dry Spray Antiperspirant/Deodorant 107 g

037000728863: Old Spice Sweat Defense Stronger Swagger Dry Spray Antiperspirant/Deodorant 107 g

012044029053: Old Spice Sweat Defense Ultimate Captain Dry Spray Antiperspirant/Deodorant 107 g

056100008965: Secret Baby Powder Spray Antiperspirant/Deodorant 122 g

037000747765: Secret Outlast Completely Clean Dry Spray Antiperspirant/Deodorant 107 g
037000747826: Secret Outlast Protecting Powder Dry Spray Antiperspirant/Deodorant 107 g

037000729587: Secret Dry Spray Lavender Anti-perspirant/Deodorant 107 g

037000729600: Secret Dry Spray Waterlily Anti-perspirant/Deodorant 107 g

If you have one of the sprays, you can get in touch with the company to get a refund.

Consumers with questions regarding this recall can seek more information via the Consumer Care team at 888-339-7689 from Monday – Friday from 9:00am – 6:00pm EST or by visiting visit www.oldspice.com or www.secret.com for more information about the impacted products and to learn how to receive reimbursement for eligible products. Consumers should contact their physician or healthcare provider if they have experienced any problems that may be related to using these products.

The Associated Press contributed to this post.

Copyright © 2021 WLS-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Read original article here

Procter & Gamble recalling select Old Spice, Secret aerosol sprays due to cancer-causing chemical

Proctor & Gamble is voluntary recalling all lots of Old Spice and Secret aerosol spray antiperspirants and Old Spice Below Deck aerosol spray products with an expiry through September 2023 due to the presence of the chemical benzene. 

KRAFT HEINZ RECALLS SOME KOOL-AID, LEMONADE POWDERED BEVERAGES THAT MAY CONTAIN PIECES OF METAL OR GLASS

The 18 recalled products, which were distributed nationwide in the United States through retail outlets and online, include:

  • Old Spice High Endurance AP Spray Pure Sport 12/6oz (012044001912)
  • Old Spice Hardest Working Collection Inv Spray Stronger Swagger 3.8oz (012044044759)
  • Old Spice Hardest Working Collection Inv Spray Pure Sport Plus 12/3.8oz (037000729747)
  • Old Spice Hardest Working Collection Inv Spray Stronger Swagger 12/3.8oz (037000730347)
  • Old Spice Hardest Working Collection Inv Spray Ult Captain 12/3.8oz (037000749479)
  • Old Spice Below Deck Powder Spray Unscented 12/4.9oz (037000695714)
  • Old Spice Below Deck Powder Spray Fresh Air 12/4.9oz (037000695707)
  • Secret Aerosol Powder Fresh Twin Pack (037000586906)
  • Secret Aerosol Powder Fresh 12/6OZ (037000711087)
  • Secret Aerosol Powder Fresh 12/4OZ (037000711094)
  • Secret Fresh Collection Inv Spray Waterlily 3.8oz (037000723721)
  • Secret Fresh Collection Inv Spray Lavender 12/3.8oz (037000729860)
  • Secret Fresh Collection Inv Spray Water Lily 12/3.8oz (037000729914)
  • Secret Fresh Collection Inv Spray Light Essentials 12/3.8oz (037000729921)
  • Secret Fresh Collection Inv Spray Rose 12/3.8oz (037000798842)
  • Secret Outlast Inv Spray Completely Clean 12/3.8oz (037000747642)
  • Secret Outlast Inv Spray Protecting Powder 12/3.8oz (037000747727)
  • Old Spice Pure Sport 2021 Gift Set (012044048535)

Proctor & Gamble is voluntary recalling all lots of Old Spice and Secret aerosol spray antiperspirants and Old Spice Below Deck aerosol spray products with an expiry through September 2023 due to the presence of the chemical benzene.  (Proctor & Gamble)

Proctor & Gamble is voluntary recalling all lots of Old Spice and Secret aerosol spray antiperspirants and Old Spice Below Deck aerosol spray products with an expiry through September 2023 due to the presence of the chemical benzene.  (Proctor & Gamble)

Exposure to benzene, which can occur by inhalation, orally, and through the skin, can result in cancers, including leukemia and blood cancer of the bone marrow, and life threatening blood disorders. 

“Based on exposure modeling and the cancer risk assessments published by the Environmental Protection Agency, daily exposure to benzene in the recalled products at the levels detected in our testing would not be expected to cause adverse health consequences,” Proctor & Gamble emphasized in its recall notice on Tuesday.  

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

Proctor & Gamble, which has notified retailers to remove the impacted products from its shelves, has not received any reports of adverse events related to the recall to date. Consumers should stop using and discard the affected aerosol spray products. Old Spice and Secret will offer reimbursement to consumers who have purchased the impacted products. 

Ticker Security Last Change Change %
PG PROCTER & GAMBLE CO. 148.66 -0.78 -0.52%

Consumers should contact their physician or healthcare provider if they experience any problems that may be related to using the recalled products. Adverse reactions or quality problems can be reported online to the Food and Drug Administration’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting program. 

Read original article here

U’s Osterholm joins a call for respecting COVID-19 aerosol threat

University of Minnesota infectious disease expert Michael Osterholm joined with leading aerosol and occupational scientists Monday to call for clearer federal guidance on the risk of COVID-19 spreading through tiny aerosols floating in the air.

The researchers criticized the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for acknowledging the aerosol risk last fall but offering no changes in the national COVID-19 response strategy to confront it. The national strategy primarily targets the risk of people projecting larger, virus-carrying droplets at others nearby.

“Aerosols produced through breathing, talking, and singing … can remain in air and viable for long periods of time and travel long distances within a room and sometimes farther,” the authors wrote in a letter to the CDC and the White House pandemic response leader.

The warning comes amid improving pandemic metrics in Minnesota and plans by Gov. Tim Walz to hasten the reopening of middle and high schools to in-person learning. Walz will announce a school reopening strategy at noon Wednesday, and noted in a news release that Minnesota is aggressively testing teachers for COVID-19 and is one of eight states prioritizing them for vaccine.

The state on Tuesday reported two more COVID-19 deaths and 456 infections with the coronavirus that causes the disease — the lowest one-day total since Sept. 15. Minnesota has reported 6,380 COVID-19 deaths and 474,621 infections.

The state also reported a 3.8% positivity rate of diagnostic testing for COVID-19 — below the 5% caution threshold that suggests uncontrolled spread of the virus. The number of COVID-19 patients in Minnesota intensive-care beds also dropped from a peak of 399 on Dec. 1 to 57.

Only 15 COVID-19 cases were reported last week in nursing homes — the lowest count since March and an indication that priority vaccination of long-term care facility residents is working, said Jan Malcolm, state health commissioner.

“Our goal is absolutely to get the number of cases, hospitalizations and certainly deaths due to COVID-19 down to zero, and we see evidence that the vaccines are helping bring those numbers even further below where we have been,” she said.

At least 686,210 people in Minnesota have received at least the first of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine. Of them, 240,027 have completed the series. Limited doses have gone to a group of more than 1.5 million long-term care residents, health care workers, senior citizens and educators.

The federal government pledged an increase in doses next week, but some of that is only “on paper” because vials of Pfizer vaccine are officially considered to contain six doses rather than five, said Kris Ehresmann, state infectious disease director. Minnesota providers already had been routinely extracting sixth doses out of those vials.

Ehresmann warned that winter storms in the southern U.S. are disrupting vaccine delivery and could result in some vaccine appointments being delayed or rescheduled.

Beyond expanding access to vaccines, Ehresmann said the state COVID-19 response has focused on the established threat of viral transmission through respiratory droplets — rather than aerosols. A public indoor mask-wearing mandate and social distancing guidelines both target that method of transmission.

Airborne transmission is more of an acknowledged risk in health care settings, she said, especially when COVID-19 patients receive respiratory procedures that could spread aerosols. Many COVID-19 treatment rooms have been fitted with negative-airflow systems to prevent particles from spreading outside rooms.

Ehresmann agreed with the need for caution because of the emergence of new and more infectious variants of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. Minnesota has encountered 40 COVID-19 cases involving the B.1.1.7 variant found in the United Kingdom, she said. Minnesota also has seen two of three verified infections in the U.S. so far with the P.1 variant identified in Brazil.

“It’s really important that we celebrate where we are at, but we do not move too quickly” in scaling back mitigation measures, Ehresmann said. “We want to make sure we are not giving a foothold to these variants.”

Osterholm and colleagues noted in their letter to the CDC and the White House pandemic response leader the emerging risk of variants as a reason to take the existing risk of aerosol COVID-19 transmission seriously. Two top aerosol scientists — Donald Milton of the University of Maryland and Linsey Marr of Virginia Tech — were among the 13 experts who signed the letter.

“While COVID-19 infections and deaths have started to decline in recent weeks, they remain at a very high level,” they wrote. “Unless strengthened precautionary measures are implemented, the new variants will likely bring an explosion in new infections.”

The group called for guidelines that address how indoor ventilation can lower risks, and an expansion in occupational groups required to wear N95 respirators — fitted masks that substantially reduce the risk of particle inhalation. More workers in health care and essential front-line industries should wear them, the group argued, especially since manufacturing has overcome a springtime shortage.

Minnesota has a reserve inventory of 2.7 million respirators, according to its pandemic response dashboard.

The group also called for increased filtration standards for common store-bought masks to improve public protection against smaller airborne particles.

Government health agencies have maintained that closer droplet transmission is the most common method of COVID-19 transmission and have been less certain about aerosols. The risk appears less than with other viruses such as measles, which was famously shown by Minnesota researchers to have spread during a 1991 Special Olympics event from the surface of the Metrodome to the upper deck stands.

A separate team of U engineers conducted tests and simulations about how particles carrying SARS-CoV-2 could spread in indoor environments such as elevators, classrooms and grocery stores.

They published a series of studies analyzing air flowing from instruments in Orchestra Hall and what measures could protect the musicians and patrons, and recently partnered with Ford Motor Co. on the development of low-cost filtration kits to improve air quality in tight classrooms and indoor spaces.

Some restaurants and businesses in Minnesota have taken the precaution of installing stronger filters in their ventilation systems or portable air cleaners to address the risks.

Jeremy Olson • 612-673-7744

rn{% endblock %}"},"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/limit-signup-optimizely/start"},{"id":"limit-signup","count":12,"action":"ignore","mute":true,"action_config":{"template":"{% extends "grid" %}rnrn{% block heading_text %}Youu2019ve read your 10 free articles for this 30 day period. Sign up now for local coverage you wonu2019t find anywhere else, special sections and your favorite columnists. StarTribune puts Minnesota and the world right at your fingertips. {% endblock %}rnrn{% block last %}rn{{ parent() }}rn{# limit Krux pixel from https://www.squishlist.com/strib/customshop/328/ #}rnrnrn{% endblock %}"},"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/limit-signup/start"},{"id":"meter-desktop-331","count":10,"action":"ignore","mute":false,"action_config":false,"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/meter-desktop-331/start"},{"id":"PDA991499opt","count":9,"action":"ignore","mute":true,"action_config":false,"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/PDA991499opt/start"},{"id":"limit","count":8,"action":"inject","mute":false,"action_config":{"template":"

rnrnrnrn

rn
rn
rn rn

rn t

rn SUBSCRIBErn Already a subscriber? Log in.rn
rn
All Star Tribune readers without a Digital Access subscription are given a limited number of complimentary articles every 30 days. Once the article limit is reached we ask readers to purchase a subscription including Digital Access to continue reading. Digital Access is included in all multi-day paper home delivery, Sunday + Digital, and Premium Digital Access subscriptions. After the 1 month Premium Digital Access introductory period you will be charged at a rate of $14.99 per month. You can see all subscription options or login to an existing subscription herern

rn rn

rn

rn

rn

rn

rn"},"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/limit/start"},{"id":"nag","count":7,"action":"lightbox","mute":true,"action_config":{"height":null,"width":"630px","redirect_on_close":null,"template":"{% extends "shell" %}rnrn{% block substyles %}rn

rn{% endblock %}rnrn{% block page %}rn{#rnrn{{ limit - count - 1 }}rnrn{{ form.flow_form_open({nextAction: 'firstSlide'}, null, null, '_top') }}rn {{ form.btn('Save Now') }}rn{{ form.flow_form_close() }}rnrn

rnrnrnu2022 rnrnrnrn#}rn

rn
rn

You have {{ limit - count - 1 }} articles left

rn

rn rn u00a0u00a0u2022u00a0u00a0rn rn

rn

rn

rn

rn rn

Over 70% off!

rn

rn

rn

rn

99u00a2 for first 4 weeks

rn {{ form.flow_form_open({nextAction: 'firstSlide'}, null, null, '_top') }}rn {{ form.button('Save Now', 'btn nag-btn') }}rn {{ form.flow_form_close() }}rn

rn

rn{% endblock %}rnrn{% block last %}rn{{ parent() }}rnrn{% endblock %}"},"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/nag/start"},{"id":"x","count":4,"action":"ignore","mute":true,"action_config":false,"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/x/start"},{"id":"multi-start","count":3,"action":"fly_in","mute":true,"action_config":{"location":"bottom_left","slide_direction":"bottom","group_id":null,"display_delay":"0","collapse_delay":"10","template":"

rn

rn
rn

rn u00d7rn

rn

rn

From just

rn

$3.79 99u00a2 a week

rn Save nowrn

rn

rn

"},"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/multi-start/start"}]};


Read original article here