Tag Archives: 5G

Xi Jinping’s tech policy in focus

Chinese President Xi Jinping proposing a toast at the welcome banquet for leaders attending the Belt and Road Forum at the Great Hall of the People on April 26, 2019 in Beijing, China.

Nicolas Asfouri | Getty Images

Xi Jinping once declared China should “prioritize innovation” and be on the “cutting-edge (of) frontier technologies, modern engineering technologies, and disruptive technologies.”

Since that speech in 2017, Beijing has spoken about technologies it wants to boost its prowess in, ranging from artificial intelligence to 5G technology and semiconductors.

Five years since Xi’s address at the Communist Party of China’s last National Congress, the global reality for the world’s second-largest economy has transformed. It comes amid an ongoing trade war with the U.S., challenges from Covid and a change in political direction at home that have hurt some of Beijing’s goals.

On Sunday, the 20th National Congress — held once every five years — will begin in Beijing. The high-level meeting is expected to pave the way for Xi to carry on as head of the Communist Party for an unprecedented third five-year term.

Xi will take stock of China’s achievements in science and technology, which have yielded mixed results.

“I agree it is a mixed bag,” Charles Mok, visiting scholar at the Global Digital Policy Incubator at Stanford University.

He said China sets “lofty” goals as it targets to be the best, but “they are limited politically and ideologically in terms of the strategies to reach them.”

Private tech enterprises are faltering under stricter regulation and a slowing economy. China is far from self-sufficient in semiconductors, a task made harder by recent U.S. export controls. Censorship on the mainland has tightened as well.

But China has made some notable advancements in areas such as 5G and space travel.

U.S.-China tech war

“It would seem that Xi underestimated the challenges China faced in overcoming its reliance on foreign, mostly U.S. firms…”

Paul Triolo

technology policy lead, Albright Stonebridge

Zero Covid

Semiconductor self-sufficiency

Beijing put a lot of focus on self-sufficiency in various areas of technology, but especially on semiconductors. The drive to boost China’s domestic chip industry was given further impetus as the trade war began.

In its its five-year development plan, the 14th of its kind, Beijing said it would make “science and technology self-reliance and self-improvement a strategic pillar for national development.”

One area it hoped to do so was in semiconductors.

But a number of restrictions by the U.S. has put a dent in those ambitions.

“It would seem that Xi underestimated the challenges China faced in overcoming its reliance on foreign, mostly U.S. firms, in key ‘core’ or ‘hard’ technologies such as semiconductors,” Paul Triolo, the technology policy lead at consulting firm Albright Stonebridge, told CNBC.

“He also did not account for growing U.S. concern over semiconductors as foundational to key technologies.”

Looking ahead, the latest package of U.S. controls will make a huge dent in China’s technology ambitions.

Paul Triolo

technology policy lead, Albright Stonebridge

Things did not look as “bleak” for China’s semiconductors in 2017 as they do now, Triolo said.

“Looking back, Xi should have redoubled efforts to bolster China’s domestic semiconductor manufacturing equipment sector, but even there, a heavy reliance on inputs such as semiconductors has made it difficult for Chinese firms to reproduce all elements of those complex supply chains.”

The Biden administration unveiled a slew of restrictions last week that aim to cut China off from key chips and manufacturing tools to make those semiconductors. Washington is looking to choke off supply of chips for critical technology areas like artificial intelligence and supercomputing.

Analysts previously told CNBC that this will likely hobble China’s domestic technology industry.

That’s because part of the rules also require certain foreign-made chips that use American tools and software in the design and manufacturing process, to obtain a license before being exported to China.

Chinese domestic chipmakers and design companies still rely heavily on American tools.

Chipmakers — like Taiwanese firm TSMC, the most advanced semiconductor manufacturer in the world —are also dependent on U.S. technology. That means any Chinese company relying on TSMC may be cut off from supply of chips.

Meanwhile, China does not have any domestic equivalent of TSMC. China’s leading chip manufacturer, SMIC, is still generations behind TSMC in its technology. And with the latest U.S. restrictions, it could make it difficult for SMIC to catch up.

So China is still a long way from self-sufficiency in semiconductors, even though Beijing is focusing heavily on it.

“Looking ahead, the latest package of U.S. controls will make a huge dent in China’s technology ambitions, because the curbs on advances semiconductors,” Triolo said. The curbs will “ripple across multiple associated sectors, and make it impossible for Chinese firms to compete in some areas, such as high performance computers, and AI related applications such as autonomous vehicles, that rely on hardware advances to make progress.”

China’s tech crackdown

A major hallmark of Xi’s last five years is how he has transformed China into one of the strictest regulatory regimes globally for technology.

Over the last two years, China’s once free-wheeling and fast-growing tech giants have come under heavy scrutiny.

It began in November 2020 when the $34.5 billion initial public offering of Ant Group, which would have been the biggest in the world, was pulled by regulators.

That sparked several months where regulators moved swiftly to introduce a slew of regulation in areas from antitrust to data protection.

In one of the first regulations of its kind globally, Beijing also passed a law which regulated how tech firms can use recommendation algorithms, underscoring the intense tightening that took place.

Looking back to Xi’s 2017 speech, there were hints that regulation was coming.

“We will provide more and better online content and put in place a system for integrated internet management to ensure a clean cyberspace,” Xi said at that time.

But the pace at which regulations were passed and the scope of the rules took investors off guard, and billions were wiped off the share prices of China’s biggest tech companies — including Alibaba and Tencent — in 2021 and 2022. They have yet to recover from those losses.

Analysts pointed out that even though there were mentions about cleaning up the internet, the swift nature of regulation that subsequently swept across China was unlikely to have been anticipated — even by Xi himself.

“While I believe that in 2017, Xi had absolutely become focused on strengthening platform regulation, I very much doubt that the rapid-fire nature of… [the regulation] was pre-planned,” Kendra Schaefer, partner at Trivium China consultancy, told CNBC.

Five years ago, Xi said the government would “do away with regulations and practices that impede the development of a unified market and fair competition, support the growth of private businesses, and stimulate the vitality of various market entities.”

This is another pledge that appears not to have been met. China’s technology giants are also posting their slowest growth in history, partly due to tighter regulations. Part of the story, analysts say, is about Xi exerting more control over powerful technology businesses that were perceived as a threat to the ruling Communist Party of China.

“It is obvious that they are not supporting the growth of private businesses,” Mok said. “In my view, they have not succeeded.”

“Think of it that they are putting the Party agenda and total control as the top priority … No one can be successful unless the Party is successful in sustaining its dominance and total control.” 

China’s successes from 5G to space

Despite the challenges, China has found success in the realm of science and technology since 2017. Space exploration has been a key focus.

In 2020, a Chinese moon mission concluded with its spacecraft returning back to Earth with lunar samples, a first for the country. That same year, China completed its own satellite navigation system called Beidou, a rival to the U.S.-government owned Global Positioning System (GPS).

Last year, China landed an un-crewed spacecraft on Mars and is planning its first crewed mission to the Red Planet in 2033.

China was also one of the leading nations globally to roll out next-generation 5G mobile networks, which promise super-fast speeds and the ability to support new industries like autonomous driving.

In electric vehicles, China has also pushed ahead. The country is the largest electric car market in the world and home to CATL, the world’s largest EV battery maker, which is looking to expanding overseas.

What next for Xi’s tech policy?

The regulatory assault on the domestic technology sector, which has slowed in recent months, will not go away entirely.

Even if regulatory actions are “moving into a new phase” in Xi’s third term, companies like Alibaba and Tencent won’t necessarily see the breakneck growth speeds they’ve seen in the past, Mok said.

“Even if they find their feet, it is not the same ground. They won’t see that growth, because if China’s overall GDP and economy growth is like what people are talking about now for the next several years … then why should they even outperform the whole China market?” Mok said.

Without a doubt, technology will continue to be a key focus for Xi over the coming five years, with a focus on self-sufficiency. China will likely continue to strive for success in areas Beijing deems as “frontier” technologies such as artificial intelligence and chips.

But Xi’s job in tech is now that much harder.

“As the U.S. continues to ratchet up controls in other areas of technology, and squeeze technology investments in China via outbound investment reviews, the overall innovation engine in China, heretofore driven by the private sector, will also begin to sputter, and the government will have to increasingly step in with funding,” Triolo said.

“This is not necessarily a recipe for success, except for manufacturing heavy sectors, but not for advanced semiconductors, software, and AI.”

Read original article here

The FAA Found A Workaround To Most Airplanes’ 5G Issues

Photo: Patrick T. Fallon (Getty Images)

The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration seems to have found a workaround for the 5G issues that started to impact flights a few weeks ago: It just approved additional altimeters that will allow about 90 percent of the U.S. commercial aviation fleet to perform low-visibility landings at airports near 5G hubs.

According to Reuters, the FAA said it cleared seven more altimeters, bringing the total number of approved altimeters to 20.

Radio altimeters are used to give data on height above ground for bad-weather plane landings. The issue was essentially that the FAA and certain airlines feared planes wouldn’t be able to safely land in low-visibility conditions, since the 5G waves were broadcast on a very similar radio wavelength.

Earlier this month, communication giants AT&T and Verizon agreed to delay the implementation of new telecom towers near some airports as they rolled it out all over the rest of the country. Before this, thousands of flights were delayed over fears from airlines.

Verizon agreed to temporarily not turn on about 500 towers near airports, according to Reuters.

Some U.S, airlines are still concerned about Verizon’s plans to turn them on February 1.

On Tuesday, the FAA also published an airworthiness directive on the Boeing 777 and 747-8 aircrafts. It said the interference may impact multiple airplane systems using radio altimeter data. However, the directive doesn’t prevent any operations at nearly all large U.S. airports.

But why is 5G causing all of this interference? Well, it comes down to radio waves C-band to be specific. The frequencies of both 5G and airline altimeters are very close to one another and could theoretically interfere with one another.

It led to quite the back and forth between the FAA, airlines and telecommunications companies. Only time will tell if these new altimeters are just a stop-gap fix or a more permanent solution to these issues.

Read original article here

5G launch Wednesday caps years of hype, investment

Workers install equipment on a 5G cell tower in Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S., on Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2022.

George Frey | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Verizon and AT&T turned on a major new part of their 5G networks Wednesday, the culmination of a yearslong process that saw both carriers invest billions in spectrum and equipment to upgrade their networks.

The networks that lit up on Wednesday are using wavelengths called C-band to cover a large part of the country with wireless service that should be noticeably faster than current 4G service.

Verizon says 90 million people will get access to the new 5G service this month in major cities including New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco. AT&T said it plans to cover as many as 75 million people with its C-band network by the end of the year.

The rollout brings to fruition major 5G investments from both carriers. Verizon spent $45.5 billion in a government auction last year to secure the rights to the wavelengths it’s using for its network. AT&T spent more than $23 billion. The carriers have since spent additional billions to actually build the networks and install equipment on cell towers.

“We’ve invested — just to get the spectrum, some $40-odd billion. And then we’ve also had to kick money into the kitty to help clear the spectrum. So you know, we’re looking upward of $53 billion,” Verizon CTO Kyle Malady told CNBC. Verizon will spend $10 billion over the next three years to continue building its network, he said.

The ‘Goldilocks band’

Some forms of 5G were already available to wireless subscribers in the U.S.

Verizon and AT&T already offer two classes of service they market as 5G. Low-band service covers large areas, but only at about the same speeds as before, while millimeter-wave service offers much higher speeds, but only over small areas, such as street corners or sports stadiums.

T-Mobile, the third major carrier, has offered “mid-band” 5G since 2020 using different spectrum on the 2.5GHz band it acquired when it bought Sprint. T-Mobile says its network covers 186 million people in the U.S.

But the C-band networks going online Wednesday are different. They use newly available wavelengths, between 2.7 and 3.98GHz, that are capable of both traveling long distances and carrying enough data to deliver faster internet connections.

The unique properties of these wavelengths led to their substantial price at auction, and they were often called the “Goldilocks band” in the industry because they are perfectly situated for 5G services.

“It’s excellent right down the middle. You have a great amount of bandwidth, it propagates well and it goes through buildings,” Malady said. “I give credit to the U.S. government, they put a lot of spectrum up for auction. This rarely comes along. And that’s why we were so aggressive in the auction to get this.”

The C-band networks were supposed to be turned on in December, but the rollout was delayed twice because of Federal Aviation Administration concerns that their wavelengths could interfere with tools pilots use to land safely.

Verizon and AT&T both said on Tuesday that they would delay launching the service near airports while the issues are resolved, but that their new networks would be turned on everywhere else.

“We are frustrated by the FAA’s inability to do what nearly 40 countries have done, which is to safely deploy 5G technology without disrupting aviation services, and we urge it do so in a timely manner,” an AT&T spokesperson said in a statement on Tuesday.

Now Verizon and AT&T will need to show that these investments can pay off in the form of better wireless service to encourage customers to opt for more expensive 5G plans and open new markets, such as households replacing cable internet access.

“Where’s the return on 5G investment?” asked Credit Suisse analysts last October. “The generational change from 4G to 5G has led to more capable wireless networks, but the benefits to operators seem less than hoped (and less than hyped.)”

“While 5G defensively helps networks keep up with traffic and consumer expectations, it is not the factor pulling consumers up operators’ tier lineup,” Credit Suisse analyst Douglas Mitchelson wrote.

Verizon announced earlier this month new plans that include 5G service with unlimited data. AT&T unlimited plans also include access to 5G service.

Look for the 5Guw or 5G+ symbol on your phone

Malady said that Verizon’s rollout could take as long as 12 hours as the network lights up from the East Coast to the West Coast.

People with compatible phones could see the network symbol at the top of their smartphone screen change Wednesday and access peak download speeds 10 times faster than an LTE network, according to the carriers.

For Verizon subscribers connecting to the new network, they will see “5Guw,” for 5G ultra-wideband. AT&T subscribers will see “5G+.”

Phones that can support the new network include Apple’s iPhone 12 and iPhone 13, newer Samsung Galaxy phones, and Google’s Pixel 6. Users will also need to be on a plan that includes 5G service.

Read original article here

FAA Announces the 50 Airports That Will Have 5G Buffer Zones

Photo: John Lamparski/SOPA Images/LightRocket (Getty Images)

The Federal Aviation Administration on Friday published a list of the 50 U.S. airports that will have buffer zones, or areas where AT&T and Verizon have agreed to limit 5G signals for six months.

In a statement, the FAA said it worked with the aviation community to determine where the buffer zones would reduce the risk of disruptions, considering factors such as traffic volume, the number of low-visibility days, and geographic location. The agency said that many airports are not currently affected by AT&T and Verizon’s upcoming 5G deployment, a service the wireless companies will activate on Jan. 19 after various delays.

The buffer zones aim to reduce the potential interference of 5G antennas with airplane instruments, called radar altimeters, that tell pilots how far they are from the ground. They help pilots navigate and land planes during bad weather and prevent crashes.

Airports on the list include Dallas Love Field, a major passenger hub for Southwest Airlines, and Chicago O’Hare, which is a large hub for United Airlines and American Airlines. Facilities that serve as hubs for cargo and private jets, such as airports in Indianapolis, Northern New Jersey, and New York City, were also part of those selected.

In addition, the list includes airports in Austin, Nashville, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, Seattle, and San Francisco, among many others.

The FAA’s announcement comes amid a temporary ceasefire between transportation regulators and aviation groups, who worry that 5G antennas near some airports could affect the accuracy of altimeters’ readings, and telecommunications regulators and wireless companies, who maintain that 5G technology will not pose safety issues.

On Monday, AT&T and Verizon agreed to pause their 5G rollout for two additional weeks at the request of federal agencies. The move was a rapid about-face from the wireless companies, which just a day earlier had fervently put their foot down and said that agreeing to the petition would have been “an irresponsible abdication of the operating control required to deploy world-class and globally competitive communications networks.”

AT&T and Verizon bought nearly all of the C-band radio spectrum auctioned by the Federal Communications Commission last year, spending a combined total of nearly $70 billion, to improve their 5G networks.

Over the next six months, which is how long AT&T and Verizon have agreed to keep the buffers in place around the 50 airports, the FAA will work with aerospace manufacturers and airlines to confirm whether planes can safely operate after the wireless companies’ 5G service is turned on.

Read original article here

US Asks AT&T, Verizon To Delay 5G Rollout Over Aviation Safety Concerns

Wireless industry group CTIA said 5G is safe and spectrum is being used in about 40 other countries.

Washington:

U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and the head of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on Friday asked AT&T and Verizon Communications to delay the planned Jan. 5 introduction of new 5G wireless service over aviation safety concerns.

In a letter Friday seen by Reuters, Buttigieg and FAA Administrator Steve Dickson asked AT&T Chief Executive John Stankey and Verizon Chief Executive Hans Vestberg for a delay of no more than two weeks as part of a “proposal as a near-term solution for advancing the co-existence of 5G deployment in the C-Band and safe flight operations.”

The aviation industry and FAA have raised concerns about potential interference of 5G with sensitive aircraft electronics like radio altimeters that could disrupt flights.

“We ask that your companies continue to pause introducing commercial C-Band service for an additional short period of no more than two weeks beyond the currently scheduled deployment date of January 5,” the letter says.

Verizon spokesperson Rich Young said it had received the letter and needs time to review it. AT&T did not immediately comment but earlier Friday the two companies accused the aerospace industry of seeking to hold C-Band spectrum deployment “hostage until the wireless industry agrees to cover the costs of upgrading any obsolete altimeters.”

Buttigieg and Dickson said under the framework “commercial C-band service would begin as planned in January with certain exceptions around priority airports.”

The FAA and the aviation industry would identify priority airports “where a buffer zone would permit aviation operations to continue safely while the FAA completes its assessments of the interference potential.”

The government would work to identify “mitigations for all priority airports” to enable most “large commercial aircraft to operate safely in all conditions.” That would allow deployment around “priority airports on a rolling basis” — aiming to ensure activation by March 31 barring unforeseen issues.

The carriers, which won the spectrum in an $80 billion government auction, previously agreed to precautionary measures for six months to limit interference.

On Thursday, trade group Airlines for America asked the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to halt deployment of new 5G wireless service around many airports, warning thousands of flights could be disrupted: “The potential damage to the airline industry alone is staggering.”

Wireless industry group CTIA said 5G is safe and spectrum is being used in about 40 other countries.

House Transportation Committee chair Peter DeFazio Friday backed the airline group petition warning “we can’t afford to experiment with aviation safety.”

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Read original article here

Airlines file emergency request asking FCC to delay 5G rollout

A top airlines trade group on Thursday filed an emergency request for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to delay the rollout of 5G wireless service, citing concerns that the technology could cause disruptions for flights.

The group, Airlines for America, represents cargo airlines and passenger airlines in the U.S. It requested that the agency delay the use of the service near airports such as George Bush Airport in Houston, John F. Kennedy in New York and Newark Liberty in New Jersey, according to Bloomberg News.

AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc. were given authorization by the FCC earlier this year to deploy C-Band spectrum 5G wireless with a rollout scheduled for Jan. 5. The Federal Aviation Administration as well as CEOs of Boeing and Airbus Americas pushed back on the agreement, noting that 5G could cause potential flight diversions and delays.

On Thursday, Airlines for America said that the FCC “has never provided a reasoned analysis of why it has rejected the evidence submitted by the aviation interests,” Bloomberg News reported.

Wireless companies agreed to roll out the 5G service at reduced power for a temporary amount of time in order to compromise with airline groups, but Airlines for America said that would not be enough, the news outlet noted.

 “Despite these meritless claims, the wireless industry continues to collaborate in good faith with the aviation industry, the FAA and the FCC, and remains confident that a positive resolution can be reached,” the group reportedly said in a statement.



Read original article here

AT&T, Verizon propose limits to 5G to break regulatory impasse

Cellphone carriers AT&T and Verizon on Wednesday proposed limits on their 5G networks for the first half of 2022 in an effort to launch their services while also addressing regulatory concerns about potentially disrupting air traffic safety, The Wall Street Journal reported.

The Journal, which obtained a copy of a letter that both carriers sent to Federal Communications Commission chairwoman Jessica RosenworcelJessica RosenworcelHillicon Valley — Presented by Ericsson — House passes Biden plan with 0M for cyber FCC votes to let people text 988 to reach suicide prevention hotline Hillicon Valley — TikTok, Snapchat seek to distance themselves from Facebook MORE on Wednesday, reported that the companies proposed to reduce or cap the strength of its 5G services across the country, especially near helipads and airports. 

“This is an important and encouraging step, and we are committed to continued constructive dialogue with all of the stakeholders. We look forward to reviewing the AT&T and Verizon proposal,” the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said in a statement. “The FAA believes that aviation and 5G C-band wireless service can safely co-exist.”

The proposal represented “one of the most comprehensive efforts in the world to safeguard aviation technologies,” a FCC spokesman said, according to the Journal. 

At the crux of the issue is how frequencies from 5G may affect a system used to calculate distance between the ground and aircraft, which is measured by radar altimeters, according to the Journal.

Some radar altimeters may be sensitive and able to pick up the transmissions of 5G, though cellphone carriers contend those 5G transmissions are lower than those picked up by the altimeters. The cellphone carrier proposed the limits as a way to give the government time to look into the issue. 

Although the carriers said the limits would not have a significant impact on the speed of services they provide to customers, The Journal noted that the proposal is significant because the companies have spent billions on the 5G spectrum licenses. 

The Hill has reached out to AT&T, Verizon and the FCC for comment.



Read original article here

New iPhone SE Rumors Claim a 5G Model Is Coming Next Year

Photo: Caitlin McGarry/Gizmodo

Rumors about the next model of Apple’s fan-favorite compact smartphone are already in full effect, though it could be well over a year before we see one.

Analyst Ross Young posted to Twitter on April 1—grain of salt, etc.—that the next iPhone SE will arrive in 2022 with the same 4.7-inch form factor as the current SE. This refreshed model, Young wrote, could come equipped with the sub-6GHz variation of 5G rather than support for all bands, including ultra-fast millimeter-wave spectrum. Young also mentioned hearing of a 6.1-inch model with a “punch hole rather than a notch” that could be released in 2023.

Some of this jibes with a previous report from reliable Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo last month. Citing a Kuo supply chain report, 9to5Mac reported that Kuo, too, expects 5G connectivity to arrive in a 2022 model of the iPhone SE. Kuo also said to expect a 2022 model to have a 4.7-inch design, but with an upgraded processor.

Most interesting among these rumors is that Apple could be planning to scrap the SE’s form factor for a larger display. It’s unclear whether the SE will sport the same size body with slimmer bezels, or whether Apple will size up the SE (the latter would be bad news for the tiny-handed among us).

Being that we are seemingly more than a year out from getting a newer iPhone SE—per reports that have a new release projected for 2022—there’s still plenty of time for SE rumors to generate hype around a newer, more powerful device. But it’s looking interesting.



Read original article here

No Good Evidence That 5G Harms Humans, New Studies Find

Public service announcement posters deployed last year in Melborne, Australia.
Photo: William West/AFP (Getty Images)

Concerns over the potential harms of 5G technology are overblown, according to two large new reviews of research recently published by scientists in Australia. Both found no clear evidence that the type of radiofrequency energy used by 5G mobile networks poses any danger to human health.

5G is the next generation of wireless communication. It enables faster speeds and lower latency than LTE, and while we’re already seeing that in action on 5G phones, it’ll take years before 5G’s potential to transform industries like autonomous cars becomes a reality.

That delayed promise hasn’t stopped some people from warning that 5G will only accelerate the harms purportedly caused by our existing use of wireless technology. The evidence for any health risks from our cell phones today isn’t particularly strong, but it’s still something scientists are keeping an eye on. In particular, there have been many studies in the lab and on animals trying to figure how varying levels of radiofrequency energy could possibly affect the body, including the sort of energy that would be emitted by 5G networks.

The two new papers are the work of researchers from the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) and the Swinburne University of Technology in Australia. Both were published this week in the Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology and are billed as the first reviews to focus on 5G specifically.

Aside from looking at animal and lab experiments, one review also analyzed epidemiological studies of radar, which uses the same sort of RF (low-level energy fields above 6 gigahertz to as high as 300 GHz) that 5G is expected to rely on. Their conclusions, based on reviewing data from over 100 studies, should be reassuring.

“In conclusion, a review of all the studies provided no substantiated evidence that low-level radio waves, like those used by the 5G network, are hazardous to human health,” said Ken Karipidis, assistant director of assessment and advice at ARPANSA, in a statement released by the agency.

The second review, which focused on RF energy specifically in the millimeter wave (MMW) band, which 5G will use, also found no link between low levels of MMW exposure and health effects. According to the researchers, both findings are just more evidence that cell phones today and in the near future will continue to emit levels of RF well below the safety thresholds established by the International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) that have been adopted worldwide.

Some studies did find plausible biological effects from this sort of RF exposure. But importantly, these studies usually weren’t replicated by other, similar experiments. Overall, most of the studies they reviewed were deemed to be low quality, Karipidis and his team concluded.

All that said, these reviews won’t be the final word on vetting the safety of 5G and cell phone radiation in general. And the researchers hope their work will help strengthen the ongoing research looking into it.

“We recommend that future experimental studies improve their design with particular attention to dosimetry and temperature control and that future epidemiological studies continue to monitor long-term health effects in the population related to wireless telecommunications,” said Karipidis.

Read original article here

Verizon Tells Users to Turn Off 5G to Save Battery, Regrets It

Photo: Theo Wargo / Getty Images for Verizon (Getty Images)

In an effort to be helpful, Verizon accidentally stuck its foot in its mouth on Sunday, and then furiously backtracked.

In a tweet on Sunday, which was spotted by the Verge, Verizon Wireless CS told customers that if they were experiencing more battery drain than usual, they should turn on LTE. As the Verge explains, the implication in this tweet directs customers to turn off 5G in phones that have it. Considering Verizon’s big push into 5G, this seems a bit weird.

“Are you noticing that your battery life is draining faster than normal?” Verizon wrote in the tweet. “One way to help conserve battery life is to turn on LTE. Just go to Cellular > Cellular Data Options > Voice & Data and tap LTE.”

A user on Twitter pointed out this irony. Verizon replied to the user but didn’t really address its previous battery advice, choosing instead to talk about 5G speeds. The original tweet about preserving battery life by switching to LTE has since been deleted, although you can see the 5G reply below.

Gizmodo reached out to Verizon to ask for clarification on whether it was really telling customers to turn off their 5G to preserve battery life. We’ll make sure to update this blog if we hear back.

As Mashable points out, 5G could very well be the cause of battery drain for some phones. Many new features and tech don’t work as envisioned at first, which is logical. Besides, 5G is a work in progress in the U.S. Addressing this in a roundabout way is kind of off-putting. Sure, if Verizon came out and flat out said 5G could be the cause of battery drain, some people might get cranky, which is also understandable given all the fanfare around 5G. But it would at least be the truth.

A quick search reveals that other companies have addressed this issue without creating a messy PR situation. Samsung, for instance, dedicated a support page to the issue of battery drains on 5G service. The manufacturer acknowledged that this problem was legitimate and explained that it was due to a limitation of current 5G networks, but that this would improve as 5G networks expand. Huawei also addressed the issue on a support page, stating that on a 5G network, more bandwidth is consumed online, and therefore more power may be consumed.

See Verizon, transparency isn’t that hard.



Read original article here