Justice Department releases unredacted Barr memo detailing decision not to charge Trump in Russia probe

The nine-page memo was released Wednesday as part of a lawsuit over public records tied to the Mueller investigation. A highly redacted version of the memo was previously released in 2021, but a federal court ordered the Justice Department to make the full document public.

“It would be rare for federal prosecutors to bring an obstruction prosecution that did not itself arise out of a proceeding related to a separate crime,” then-top Justice Department officials Steven Engel and Ed O’Callaghan wrote in the document, which concludes with a formal recommendation against charging Trump, which Barr signed and approved on March 24, 2019.

That’s the same date that Barr notified Congress of his decision not to prosecute Trump, which was later criticized by Mueller and legal analysts for cherry-picking from Mueller’s report.
The memo contains a legal analysis that was presented to Barr. Two federal courts involved in the public records case have concluded that Barr didn’t actually rely on the memo for legal advice, never seriously considered charging Trump, already made up his mind before he commissioned the memo, and that he signed the memo after notifying Congress of his decision.
Last week, in ruling that the full memo should be released, a federal appeals court described the memo as an “academic exercise” or “thought experiment” that meant to bolster the public rollout of Barr’s controversial decision against prosecuting Trump. The lawsuit was brought by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a government watchdog group.

How Barr broke with Mueller

In the memo, Barr’s deputies critiqued Mueller’s analysis of relevant obstruction cases and said Trump shouldn’t be charged because, among other reasons, “there is no precedent” and claims Mueller couldn’t find a single comparable case with “remotely similar circumstances.”

“In every successful obstruction case cited in the (Mueller) Report, the corrupt acts were undertaken to prevent the investigation and prosecution of a separate crime,” Barr’s aides argued in their memo. “The existence of such an offense is not a necessary element to proving an obstruction charge, but the absence of underlying guilt is relevant and powerful evidence.”

Mueller concluded that there were several incidents with strong evidence of obstruction by Trump. But Barr’s deputies argued that Trump mostly “attempted to modify the process under with the Special Counsel investigation progressed,” but didn’t try to “intentionally alter evidence,” which would be more serious and could be criminal.
Specifically, Barr’s deputies concluded that Trump did not break the law in any of the incidents highlighted by Mueller. This includes Trump’s firing of FBI Director James Comey, and his earlier request to Comey to go easy in the criminal probe of his former top adviser Michael Flynn.

“The President’s expression of “hope’ that Comey would ‘let this go’ did not clearly direct a particular action in the Flynn investigation, and Comey did not react at the time as though he had received a direct order from the President,” Barr’s deputies wrote in the internal memo.

The Barr aides gave some credence to the idea that Trump may have committed obstruction by telling Don McGahn, his White House counsel, to write a memo saying he never tried to fire Mueller. Barr’s aides admit Trump likely knew this was untrue, but “there is insufficient evidence to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the President sought to induce McGahn to lie.”
The release of the unredacted memo comes as the Justice Department is investigating Trump yet again for potential obstruction of justice — this time in connection with the criminal probe of whether he mishandled classified documents that he took from the White House to Mar-a-Lago.

This story has been updated with additional details.

CNN’s Katelyn Polantz, Evan Perez, Hannah Rabinowitz and Holmes Lybrand contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Destiny 2 Makes Grenade Launchers Too Powerful, Disables Them

Image: Bungie

Season of Plunder is off to a fun but rocky start, and there’s no better example of that then Destiny 2‘s heavy grenade launchers. Almost all of them have been temporarily disabled just a day into the new update after a glitch was discovered that was making them output more than double their normal damage. The move comes just ahead of the community race for the returning King’s Fall raid on Friday.

Destiny players like Aztecross and others started to notice the glitch soon after Season 18 went live. Grenade launchers were buffed in the latest patch, but some were doing way more damage then the 10 percent that was promised. The Exotic heavy grenade launcher Anarchy and a few others were instead doing 150 percent or more. As a result, some of the game’s weakest legendary weapons suddenly became among its strongest.

Here’s Aztecross’ video breaking it down:

I’ll be honest, I had a lot of fun messing around with my Tarnation with chain reaction during Ketchcrash runs for exactly this reason. Guns I wouldn’t normally touch were suddenly bringing down yellow bars in a single shot. It felt…nice. But it also was never going to last. The massive damage glitch would have obviously thrown a wrench in the King’s Fall raid race scheduled for Friday, so in order to prevent that Bungie has instead disabled almost every heavy grenade launcher in the game until the next hotfix.

It’s a pretty drastic measure and while understandable it still kind of sucks. Normally, a single weapon or piece of gear might be disabled if something’s not working as intended. That’s what Bungie did yesterday with the Icefall Mantle Exotic Titan gauntlets. One player discovered shortly after Season 18 went live that they could combine it with Titans’ new Arc 3.0 thruster dash to initiate an infinite super glitch. Not surprisingly, Bungie took it offline. Now, however, it’s an entire weapon archetype that’s being put in time out. Hopefully not for too long.

It’s far from the only glitch so far this season. There have also been a number of issues around new activities properly recording progress and awarding currency. In those cases, Bungie is recommending players wait until the timer returns them to orbit before leaving and activity. In addition, if you won’t earn new map fragments if there isn’t room in your inventory. Rather than go to the postmaster they’ll never appear in the first place. I learned that one the hard way.

If you want to experience these triumphs and travails for yourself, Destiny 2 and all of its expansions are currently free for the next week on PC and console.

    



Read original article here

Five of the most breathtaking images from NASA’s Webb telescope

Since the first photos debuted from NASA’s new James Webb in July, a steady stream of breathtaking images have been released by the groundbreaking telescope.

The $10 billion James Webb telescope, which replaced the aging Hubble telescope and launched into space in December 2021, has captured distant galaxies, blazing stars light years away and a new image of Jupiter.

Here are five of the most stunning photos taken by James Webb to date.

Southern Ring Nebula

NASA and the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI)

One of the most widely circulated across the web is of the Southern Ring Nebula, which was among the first Webb photos released on July 12.

Webb captured the remains of a white dwarf — the remnant of a star that has burned up all its nuclear fuel and expelled its outer shell into a planetary nebula.

The telescope collected the images in infrared light. Compared to Hubble, the James Webb telescope can capture space in the infrared with much more power, “providing never-before-seen vistas of the universe,” NASA officials wrote on the agency’s website.

NASA released an image of the Southern Ring Nebula in near-infrared light (NIRcam) and mid-infrared (MIRcam), with the former closer to a visible wavelength the normal human eye can see, making its images more colorful and high-resolution.

The MIRcam, however, can pick up objects in more detail. For example, the mid-infrared image of Southern Ring Nebula shows a clearer image of a bright star, gleaming in the background just beyond the white dwarf.

Cosmic Cliffs

Via NASA and the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI)

Another popular image is the Cosmic Cliffs, the edge of a forming star region that NASA compared to “craggy mountains on a moonlit evening.”

The young, star-forming region called NGC 3324 is more than 7,000 light years away in the Carina Nebula. NASA’s photos of this spot in the universe reveal a massive, gaseous cavity on the edge of NGC 3324 in a collage of orange and blue.

“The cavernous area has been carved from the nebula by the intense ultraviolet radiation and stellar winds from extremely massive, hot, young stars located in the center of the bubble,” officials wrote on the website.

In NIRcam, viewers can see hundreds of stars hidden from the normal human eye, as well as numerous galaxies shimmering in the background.

NGC 3324 was first recorded by astronomer James Dunlop in 1826.

Cartwheel Galaxy

NASA and the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI)

This Aug. 2 photo of the Cartwheel Galaxy bears similarity to a bright red, galactic ferris wheel in space.

The Cartwheel Galaxy formed about 400 million years ago, the result of high-speed collisions. Webb captured it forming in a “transitory phase,” because images of the universe light-years away are peering into the past, due to the time it takes to reach and record them.

This spiral galaxy is composed of two rings, a brighter inner ring and a colorful outer ring, according to NASA. Inside the cartwheel are spokes, or bright red streaks created by glowing, hydrocarbon-rich dust.

Jupiter

NASA and the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI)

Webb’s newest image released this week is a gorgeous image of Earth’s neighbor in the solar system.

A composite of three filters, the image of Jupiter reveals “hazes swirling around the northern and southern poles” of the gaseous planetary giant.

It also highlights the Great Red Spot, a storm so large that it that would swallow Earth, in a large white band around the gas giant.

Imke de Pater, a professor emerita of the University of California, Berkeley, who co-led the observations of Jupiter, said the team was surprised by the details of the planet.

“We hadn’t expected it to be this good,” Pater said in a statement on NASA’s blog. “It’s really remarkable that we can see details on Jupiter together with its rings, tiny satellites, and even galaxies in one image.”

Galaxy cluster SMACS 0723

NASA and the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI)

While appearing a bit cluttered, this image is stunning because it shows thousands of galaxies in a distant cluster known as SMACS 0723.

This image, among the first photos released by Webb on July 12, is the first deep-field image from the telescope.

In the center of the image is a bright, white elliptical galaxy that outshines the rest, stretching its pointed arms in five directions. Surrounding it are galaxies of all shapes and sizes, flooding the image and demonstrating just how massive the universe is.

This image was landmark, NASA wrote in July, as it showcased how Webb “will allow future researchers to finely catalog the precise compositions of galaxies in the early universe, which may ultimately reshape our understanding of how galaxies changed and evolved over billions of years.”

Read original article here

Tattoo ink can contain cancer causing chemicals, experts warn

Tattoo ink may contain toxic cancer-causing chemicals, a new study finds.

Scientists at State University of New York (SUNY) found that nearly half of a 56-sample of tattoo inks they investigated had azo-compounds, which degenerate under ultra-violet light — emitted in sunlight — into cancer-causing chemicals.  

Many also contained particles below 100 nanometers (nm) in size, which they said could get into a cell’s nucleus and trigger cancerous mutations.

The tattoo industry is largely unmonitored in the United States, researchers say, despite up to three in ten Americans having one. In Europe blue and green pigments have now been outlawed over concerns they could cause cancer.

Someone getting a tattoo is already at risk of a bacterial infection because the skin is breached, or contracting a bloodborne disease — like hepatitis B and C — if equipment is not cleaned properly. Over time, recipients may also develop nodules or granulomas around the tattoo or scar tissue.

Scientists at State University of New York investigated 56 inks used in tattoos. They found they contained chemicals that could cause cancer (file photo)

Dr John Swierk, the chemist who led the study, warned tattoos contained chemicals that could cause cancer

What are the health risks of getting a tattoo? 

A tattoo is a permanent mark on the skin made using pigments inserted via pricks.

The process causes a small amount of bleeding and pain in most recipients. But health bodies also warn people to be aware of the risks.

What are the risks of getting a tattoo?

  • Allergic reaction: Tattoo inks contain chemicals that may trigger an allergic reaction, such as a rash.
  • Skin infection: Bacteria can get beneath the skin while it is pierced to make a tattoo, triggering an infection.
  • Nodules or granulomas: In some cases, bumps can form over or around a tattoo on the body.
  • Bloodborne diseases: If the machine used to give someone a tatoo is not properly cleaned, it can transfer diseases such as hepatitis B and C.
  • MRI complications: Tattoos can cause swelling or burning in rare cases when someone gets this type of scan. The pigments may also interfere with the quality of the image. MRIs may be used to diagnose diseases of the brain, spine and abdomen like cancer.

Source: Mayo Clinic

<!- - ad: https://mads.dailymail.co.uk/v8/de/health/none/article/other/mpu_factbox.html?id=mpu_factbox_1 - ->

Advertisement

About two in five Americans already have a tattoo, with the numbers continuing to rise as body art gains social acceptance.

Little is known about what is actually in the inks used, researchers say, as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is not keeping a close eye on the industry.

The SUNY researchers investigated several popular tattoo inks and presented their findings Wednesday at the fall meeting of the American Chemical Society in Chicago, Illinois. 

A tattoo is made up of two parts. The main piece is the pigment, which can be a molecular compound — like blue pigment — or a solid compound — such as titanium dioxide.

They also contain carrier fluids — typically alcohol-based — that bring the pigment into position between two layers of skin.

In the study, the scientists tested 56 inks and found several had substances that were not listed on the label.

In one case, ethanol — which can help thin blood — was spotted in the tattoo ink. It was unclear whether this posed any health risks.

Some 23 pigments — typically blues and greens — were also found to contain azo-compounds, which can become ‘carcinogenic’ if they are exposed to too much sunlight or lots of bacteria.

Dr. John Swierk, the chemist who led the study, told DailyMail.com: ‘We don’t necessarily know what the pigments break down into and so that’s the real concern.

‘It’s possible that you might have pigments that by themselves are safe, but that photodecompose into something of concern.’ 

For the second part of the study, the scientists also investigated the size of particles in 16 inks used in tattoos.

This showed that half — including black pigments — had particles below 100 nm, which were ‘concerning’ because they could ‘get through the cell membrane and potentially cause harm.’

Speaking at a press conference today, Swierk said: ‘When you get down to that size regime you start to have concerns about nanoparticles penetrating cells, getting into the nucleus of cells, and doing damage and causing problems like cancer that way.’

He added: ‘Big companies manufacture pigments for everything, such as paint and textiles. These same pigments are used in tattoo inks.’

The scientists are now aiming to build the first comprehensive database of ingredients in different tattoo inks in the United States. 

They have yet to investigate the impact of having a tattoo removed, which is typically done via a laser. 

Specific concern was raised over two pigments — blue 15:3 and green 7 — which potentially caused cancer in 2020 amid warnings from some scientists. The European Union — which includes 27 European countries but not the UK — banned their use in tattoos in January. 

But some authorities including those in Germany warned the ban was ‘too far’, saying more evidence was needed that they were potentially toxic. Tests by German regulators found both had a ‘low level’ of toxicity.

These colors remain in use in the United States, and there is no sign that authorities are moving to ban them. 

American health authorities warn that getting a tattoo already poses several other health risks because the skin is pierced — opening up a risk of bacterial or bloodborne infection. 

They also say in rare cases the tattoo can cause problems with an MRI scan, making it harder for doctors to diagnose conditions like cancer.

There may also be problems with having a tattoo removed, with the lasers potentially causing pain, blistering and crusting.

Swierck added: ‘We have the same concerns [of cancer risks] about laser tattoo removal, since we don’t understand how the laser is transforming the pigments.’  

Read original article here

Paul Newman’s Daughters Sue Late Actor’s Charity Foundation

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — A new lawsuit has exposed a deep rift between two of Paul Newman’s daughters and the late actor’s charitable foundation funded by profits from the Newman’s Own line of food and drink products.

The daughters, Susan Kendall Newman and Nell Newman, allege their own charity organizations are both supposed to receive $400,000 a year from the Newman’s Own Foundation under a mandate by their father, but the foundation has cut those payments in half in recent years.

They filed a lawsuit Tuesday in state court in Stamford, Connecticut, seeking $1.6 million in damages to be donated to their foundations for charitable giving.

The daughters say their father, who started Newman’s Own Foundation three years before he died in 2008, allowed the foundation to use his name and likeness — but only on several conditions including giving each of the two daughters’ foundations $400,000 a year.

Susan Kendall Newman, who lives in Oregon, and Nell Newman, of California, worry the foundation is setting the stage to completely remove them from having any say in how some of profits from Newman’s Own products are donated to charities. They also accused the foundation of “contradicting” their father’s wishes and intentions for years.

Joanne Woodward and Paul Newman in 2004.

Peter Kramer via Getty Images

“No one should have to feel that the legacy of a departed loved one is being dishonored in the way that Newman’s Own Foundation has disregarded the daughters of Paul Newman,” Andy Lee, a New York City attorney for the daughters, said in a statement.

“This lawsuit does not seek personal compensation for Mr. Newman’s daughters, but simply seeks to hold (Newman’s Own Foundation) accountable to the charities they have shortchanged in recent years and would ensure they receive an increased level of support in the future, in line with Mr. Newman’s wishes,” he said.

Newman’s Own Foundation has not yet filed a response to the lawsuit in court but has released a statement.

“Best practices surrounding philanthropic organizations do not allow for the establishment of perpetual funding allotments for anyone, including Nell and Susan Newman,” the statement said. “A meritless lawsuit based on this faulty wish would only divert money away from those who benefit from Paul Newman’s generosity.”

The foundation added, “While we expect to continue to solicit Newman family recommendations for worthy organizations, our funding decisions are made each year and will continue to reflect the clear aim of Paul Newman and our responsibility to the best practices governing private foundations.”

Paul Newman, who lived in Westport with his wife, actor Joanne Woodward, created the Newman’s Own brand in 1982, with all profits going to charities. Today the product line includes frozen pizza, salsa, salad dressings and pasta sauces, as well as dog food and pet treats.

In his will, Paul Newman left his assets to his wife and Newman’s Own Foundation.

Newman’s Own, the products company, is a subsidiary of Newman’s Own Foundation, a nonprofit organization. The foundation says more than $570 million has been given to thousands of charities since 1982.

According to 2020 tax records, the foundation had more than $24 million in income and paid out $11.5 million in contributions, gifts and grants. Operating and administrative expenses totaled nearly $4.5 million.

According to his daughters’ lawsuit, Newman’s Own Foundation wrote to them only four days after their father’s death, saying it would reserve the right to stop allocating funds to charities identified by the daughters. The lawsuit says that contradicted Paul Newman’s explicit instructions to the foundation.

fbq('init', '1621685564716533'); fbq('track', "PageView");

var _fbPartnerID = null; if (_fbPartnerID !== null) { fbq('init', _fbPartnerID + ''); fbq('track', "PageView"); }

(function () { 'use strict'; document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function () { document.body.addEventListener('click', function(event) { fbq('track', "Click"); }); }); })();

Read original article here

Archives asked for records after Trump lawyer agreed they should be returned, email says

About two dozen boxes of presidential records stored in then-president Donald Trump’s White House residence were not returned to the National Archives and Records Administration in the final days of his term even after Archives officials were told by a Trump lawyer that the documents should be returned, according to an email from the top lawyer at the record-keeping agency.

“It is also our understanding that roughly two dozen boxes of original presidential records were kept in the Residence of the White House over the course of President Trump’s last year in office and have not been transferred to NARA, despite a determination by Pat Cipollone in the final days of the administration that they need to be,” wrote Gary Stern, the agency’s chief counsel, in an email to Trump lawyers in May 2021, according to a copy reviewed by The Washington Post.

Cipollone was the former White House counsel designated by Trump as one of his representatives to the Archives. A spokeswoman for Cipollone declined to comment Wednesday.

The previously unreported email — sent about 100 days after the former president left office with the subject line “Need for Assistance re Presidential Records” — shows just how early Archives officials realized that many documents were missing from the Trump White House. It also illustrates the myriad efforts Archives officials made to have the documents returned over an 18-month period, culminating with an FBI raid earlier this month at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida.

Stern, the chief counsel at the Archives, does not say in the email how he determined that the boxes were in Trump’s possession. He wrote that he also had consulted another Trump lawyer during the final days of Trump’s presidency — without any luck. “I had also raised this concern with Scott in the final weeks,” Stern writes in the email, referring to Trump lawyer Scott Gast, who is also copied on the email.

In the email, Stern again asks for the documents from Trump’s residence to be returned.

Gast did not respond to a request for comment. A Trump spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Archives did not respond to a request for comment.

Stern’s email to three Trump lawyers takes an almost pleading tone at times. Cipollone is not copied on the email, which is sent to Gast and two longtime Cipollone deputies.

Stern cites at least two high-profile documents that the Archives knew at the time were missing — letters from North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and a letter from former president Barack Obama at the beginning of Trump’s presidency.

“We know things are very chaotic, as they always are in the course of a one-term transition,” Stern writes. “ … But it is absolutely necessary that we obtain and account for all presidential records.”

Stern did not state in the email what the Archives believed were in the boxes in the White House residence.

Throughout the fall of 2021, Stern continued to urge multiple Trump advisers to help the Archives get the records back, according to people familiar with the conversations, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversations. Trump only decided to give some of the documents back after Stern told Trump officials that the Archives would soon have to notify Congress, and Stern told Trump advisers that he did not want to escalate and notify Congress, these people said.

“’We just want everything back’ was his message,” according to one Trump adviser.

Trump then returned 15 boxes of documents to the Archives in early 2022, and Archives officials urged Trump’s team to continue looking for more material at the beachfront club. But they also referred the matter to the Justice Department after realizing there were hundreds of pages of classified material in the boxes returned to the National Archives.

After extensive interviews with Trump aides, FBI officials raided Mar-a-Lago Aug. 8 and seized an additional 11 sets of classified records after executing a search warrant — adding to the large volume of secret government documents recovered from the former president’s home.

The Post has previously reported on the former president’s long-standing habit of retiring to his private residence in the White House with official documents that regularly piled up. In interviews with former White House staffers, they recalled sending boxes of disorganized materials to the residence with Trump’s body man, at the then-president’s request.

Trump and advisers have claimed that there was a standing declassification order for all documents taken to the residence, but multiple senior former administration officials have said they knew of no such order. Trump has also lamented to friends that he did not give the documents back because they were his personal property and did not belong to the U.S. government.

Read original article here

Barr memo on charging Trump in Russia investigation released to public

Comment

The Justice Department has released the entire text of a secret 2019 memo that laid out the legal rationale for not charging President Donald Trump with committing obstruction of justice in the investigation into whether Russia interfered in the 2016 election.

The nine-page memo, addressed to Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, says no potential instances of obstruction of justice by Trump that were cited by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s “would warrant a prosecution for obstruction of justice,” regardless of whether the person being investigated was a sitting president.

A government watchdog group had sued for the release of the memo, arguing that the department had dishonestly kept it under wraps. A federal judge agreed, and an appeals panel last week upheld the judge’s opinion and ordered that memo be made public.

The memo was written by two senior Justice Department officials for Attorney General William P. Barr, who subsequently told Congress there was not enough evidence to charge Trump with obstruction of Mueller’s inquiry. A redacted version was released last year, leaving the legal and factual analysis under seal.

Democrats show momentum coming out of special elections

The newly released analysis shows that Steven A. Engel, then the head of the Office of Legal Counsel, and Edward O’Callaghan, then a senior Justice Department official, concluded that Mueller did “not identify sufficient evidence to prove any criminal offense beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Pursuing such a case, the memo argued, could stretch obstruction laws to apply to a wide range of officials taking actions “that could influence an investigation.” Doing so would raise “serious questions of public policy and constitutional law that would weigh against pursuing criminal charges except under the clearest of cases,” the memo said.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, the nonprofit that sued for the document’s release, has maintained that the public deserved to know the legal rationale for not charging Trump. In a written statement Wednesday, the group said the memo “presents a breathtakingly generous view of the law and facts for Donald Trump. It significantly twists the facts and the law to benefit Donald Trump and does not comport with a serious reading of the law of obstruction of justice or the facts as found by Special Counsel Mueller.”

Justice Department officials had argued that the document was protected because it involved internal deliberations over a prosecutorial decision. But the appeals judges ruled that both Mueller and Barr had clearly already concluded that a sitting president could not be charged with a crime. The discussion was over how Barr would publicly characterize the obstruction evidence Mueller had assembled, the Justice Department conceded on appeal.

Mar-a-Lago search followed months of resistance, delay by Trump

In briefing lawmakers on the issue in 2019, Barr said since Mueller had declined to reach a conclusion on obstruction of justice, Barr and his deputy made their own determination that the evidence was lacking. When Mueller’s full report was released weeks later, the special counsel’s office said there was “substantial evidence” of obstruction. Mueller also wrote a letter to Barr saying the attorney general had mischaracterized his team’s work.

The fight over the document put Attorney General Merrick Garland’s office in the tricky legal posture of defending efforts made under his predecessor that federal courts deemed dishonest.

Last year, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson lambasted the Justice Department’s rationale for keeping the memo secret as “disingenuous … misleading and incomplete.” After reading the memo herself, she said, it was clear that there had been no contemplation of charging Trump and “the fact that he would not be prosecuted was a given.”

She ordered the documents released.

The Justice Department appealed that ruling. The appeals court not only unanimously affirmed that the records should be made public, but echoed Jackson in concluding the government “created a misimpression” and thus could not stop the memo’s release under the Freedom of Information Act.

At oral argument in December, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Sarah Harrington said “we could have been clearer,” but that “we never said” Barr was weighing charges against Trump.

“Nobody would have believed us,” she said. What the Justice Department meant to convey, she said, that Barr’s deputies were analyzing the evidence to decide “what if anything to say publicly.”

Read original article here

Scientists warn about 1:6 chance of a mega volcano eruption this century

Towering above a remote Pacific island, the volcano is some 8,000 miles from Britain — but nowhere is safe from the devastation it will unleash on the world.

For days, explosions like distant cannon fire have terrified locals and now it’s about to blow with a force 50,000 times greater than that of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima.

As the molten rock finally punches through the surface, giant flames shoot up into the sky with a blast that can be heard 1,200 miles away and sends a red-hot river of lava flowing down the volcano’s slopes. Along with choking noxious gases, this incinerates or asphyxiates many tens of thousands of islanders and destroys the homes of countless more.

Elsewhere, the giant ash cloud spewed into the atmosphere sees freak weather conditions as far afield as Western Europe. Aeroplanes are grounded, harvests are destroyed and famine and disease kill millions of people.

Scientists believe there is a one in six chance of a super eruption someone on Earth before the end of this century,  pictured a depiction of the Mount Vesuvius eruption taking from the 2014 movie Pompeii

The Vesuvius eruption in 79AD saw the town of Pompeii destroyed within hours of the explosion

Victims were covered in ash as they tried to escape the doomed port city 

They include many in Britain where crematoriums are overwhelmed by the bodies piling up in mass morgues and protests against soaring food prices turn to violent riots.

No, this is not the plot of a Hollywood disaster movie, but rather a scenario based on previous eruptions and one that has a one-in-six chance of happening this century, according to an article published in the latest issue of the respected science journal Nature.

The grim prediction comes from Dr Mike Cassidy, a volcanologist from the University of Birmingham, and Dr Lara Mani, from Cambridge University’s Centre for the Study of Existential Risk.

It’s based on deposits of sulphur — a main component of volcanic gases — found in ancient ice deposits in Antarctica and Greenland. These indicate how frequently major eruptions have happened in the past and so how likely they are in the future, and challenge what they call the ‘broad misconception’ that the risks of a major eruption are low.

Terrifyingly, those odds — equivalent to the roll of a dice — relate to an eruption rating of at least seven on the Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI), a measure which is equivalent to the Richter scale for earthquakes and runs from one for the smallest to eight for the most powerful.

To put that in perspective, the eruption of Mount Vesuvius, which claimed the lives of around 16,000 people in Pompeii and other Italian cities in 79AD, rated five on the VEI.

How such a cataclysmic event might unfold can be gauged from two historical VEI level seven eruptions. Both happened in Indonesia but had terrible ramifications in the rest of the world, Britain included.

Mount Pelée — Martinique, 1902 was the worst volcanic event of the 20th century. As the 4,500ft mountain began to erupt, insects and snakes disturbed by it surged down the mountain, attacking those in their path. In total, 30,000 perished

The first was in 1257 on the island of Lombok. The only eyewitness accounts, contained in a document written on palm leaves, describe how ‘Mount Samalas collapsed, followed by large flows of debris accompanied by the noise coming from boulders.

‘All houses were destroyed and swept away, floating on the sea, and many people died.’

A cloud of some 36 cubic miles of ash, pumice and other rock is thought to have circumnavigated the globe within a few weeks, filling the stratosphere with sulphuric acid particles that blocked out sunlight.

At his abbey in St Albans, Hertfordshire, English monk Matthew Paris recorded that the year 1258 began with ‘such unendurable cold, that it bound up the face of the earth, sorely afflicted the poor, suspended all cultivation and killed the young of the cattle’. And that was just the start.

That summer, he wrote that ‘owing to the scarcity of wheat, a very large number of poor people died; and dead bodies were found in all directions, swollen and livid, lying by fives and sixes in pigsties, on dunghills, and in the muddy streets’.

This eruption is said to have kick-started the Little Ice Age, a centuries-long chill which began at around this time and caused such phenomena as the freezing over of the River Thames.

Krakatoa — Sunda Strait, 1883: This small, uninhabited island east of Sumatra and west of Java saw an explosion which sent five cubic miles of earth 50 miles into the air. It destroyed the island and created a tsunami with 120ft waves as well as hurricanes. The eruption was heard in over 50 countries and at least 36,400 deaths are attributed to its effects

That ended in the mid-19th century, shortly after the world had suffered another VEI level seven eruption — that of Mount Tambora in April 1815. Only 100 miles from Samalas, it was every bit as deadly, killing around 100,000 people in its immediate aftermath before wreaking havoc further afield.

In 1816, Europe experienced what became known as ‘the year without a summer’.

During that seemingly endless winter, global temperatures dropped by an average of one degree and the blotting out of solar rays led to wild rumours that the sun was dying.

The frequent thunderstorms and constant rain kept people indoors for days at a time, inspiring English author Mary Shelley, holidaying in an equally gloomy Switzerland, to dream up the story of Frankenstein.

That begins with polar explorer Robert Walton, the man to whom the monster’s creator Victor Frankenstein tells his story, yearning for the North Pole, ‘a region of beauty and delight where… the sun is forever visible’.

History’s most devastating eruptions 

Mount Vesuvius — Italy, 79 AD

After centuries of lying dormant, Vesuvius erupted, sending a ten-mile cloud of ash into the air which rained down on Pompeii and Herculaneum. Those who weren’t buried by ash and mud were suffocated when toxic gas engulfed the city. Up to 16,000 people are thought to have been killed.

Mount Tambora — Indonesia, 1815

This is the most explosive volcanic event ever recorded. Twelve cubic miles of gases, dust and rock were thrown into the atmosphere and 100,000 of the island’s inhabitants died instantly. Ash shrouded and chilled parts of the planet for months, causing crop failure and famine in North America and epidemics in Europe.

Krakatoa — Sunda Strait, 1883

This small, uninhabited island east of Sumatra and west of Java saw an explosion which sent five cubic miles of earth 50 miles into the air. It destroyed the island and created a tsunami with 120ft waves as well as hurricanes. The eruption was heard in over 50 countries and at least 36,400 deaths are attributed to its effects.

Mount Pelée — Martinique, 1902

The worst volcanic event of the 20th century. As the 4,500ft mountain began to erupt, insects and snakes disturbed by it surged down the mountain, attacking those in their path. In total, 30,000 perished.

Nevado del Ruiz — Colombia, 1985

After a small first eruption which was ignored, the volcano blew again, melting a glacier which released 43 million tonnes of water mixed with ash, rocks and trees. Half an hour later the town of Armero was subsumed. More than 20,000 of its 29,000 inhabitants died.

<!- - ad: https://mads.dailymail.co.uk/v8/de/news/none/article/other/mpu_factbox.html?id=mpu_factbox_1 - ->

Advertisement

In England, the decimation of the wheat harvest and subsequent rise in prices saw riots break out in various parts of East Anglia, where protesters armed themselves with wooden clubs studded with spikes and carried flags demanding ‘Bread or Blood’. Destroying threshing machines, they also torched barns and grain sheds and the protests ended only when they were threatened with the death penalty.

The cold and damp, combined with people moving from place to place as they begged for food, also sparked one of the worst typhus epidemics in history, killing 65,000 people as it spread out of Ireland and into Britain.

As if these lessons from history are not horrifying enough, the consequences could be even greater today with eight times the world population and more than 40 times the trade. ‘Our complex global networks could make us even more vulnerable to the shocks of a major eruption,’ says Mike Cassidy.

Just how vulnerable became clear with the VEI level four eruption of Iceland’s Eyjafjallajokull volcano in the spring of 2010. The closure of international airspace caused by the resulting ash cloud cost the world economy an estimated £4 billion.

Earlier this year, an undersea VEI level six volcano blew near the Tongan archipelago in the South Pacific ocean. Producing a vertical plume extending 30 miles above the Earth’s surface, and volcanic ash falling over hundreds of miles, it caused damage equivalent to almost one-fifth of Tonga’s gross domestic product.

Underwater cables were severed, cutting off Tonga’s communications with the outside world, and the blast created an atmospheric shockwave that travelled at close to the speed of sound, creating tsunamis that reached the coasts of South America and Japan, thousands of miles away. Fortunately the eruption, which killed three people, lasted only 11 hours, but the Nature article describes it as ‘the volcanic equivalent of a “near miss” asteroid whizzing by the Earth’.

‘Had it gone on for longer… it would have had repercussions for supply chains, climate and food resources worldwide,’ it added.

Other research has suggested that likely hotspots for future VEI level seven eruptions include the Taupo Volcano in the centre of New Zealand’s North Island and Iran’s Mount Damavand, which lies just 30 miles from the densely populated capital Tehran. But it may not be the known volcanoes that we have to worry about.

The sulphur deposits found in Antarctica and Greenland suggest that there have been 97 large-magnitude explosions in the last 60,000 years, yet we have established the whereabouts of only a handful and the undiscovered ones may well be ready to blow again.

‘Volcanoes can lie dormant for a long time, but still be capable of sudden and extraordinary destruction,’ explains Dr Cassidy.

Apart from identifying and monitoring volcanoes, he and Lara Mani are calling for research into ways of reducing the impact they have. Short-lived warming agents, such as hydrofluorocarbon, might be used to counteract the sunlight-blocking sulphuric acid particles in the atmosphere, or they could be removed by substances sprayed from high-altitude aeroplanes.

Nevado del Ruiz — Colombia, 1985 After a small first eruption which was ignored, the volcano blew again, melting a glacier which released 43 million tonnes of water mixed with ash, rocks and trees. Half an hour later the town of Armero was subsumed. More than 20,000 of its 29,000 inhabitants died

Other possibilities include manipulating pockets of magma beneath active volcanoes to make them less explosive.

Such work is urgently needed, with Dr Mani comparing the impact of a giant volcanic event to that of a 1km-wide asteroid hitting the Earth.

‘They would have similar climatic consequences, but the likelihood of a volcanic catastrophe is hundreds of times higher than the combined chances of an asteroid or comet collision,’ she says.

She adds that while Nasa pumps hundreds of millions of dollars into asteroid threats annually, ‘there is a severe lack of global financing and coordination for volcano preparedness’.

‘This urgently needs to change. We are completely underestimating the risk to our societies that volcanoes pose and the current underinvestment in responding to this risk is simply reckless.’

It’s a dire warning — and one we ignore at our peril.

Read original article here

Study: Pfizer COVID pill showed no benefit in younger adults

WASHINGTON (AP) — Pfizer’s COVID-19 pill appears to provide little or no benefit for younger adults, while still reducing the risk of hospitalization and death for high-risk seniors, according to a large study published Wednesday.

The results from a 109,000-patient Israeli study are likely to renew questions about the U.S. government’s use of Paxlovid, which has become the go-to treatment for COVID-19 due to its at-home convenience. The Biden administration has spent more than $10 billion purchasing the drug and making it available at thousands of pharmacies through its test-and-treat initiative.

The researchers found that Paxlovid reduced hospitalizations among people 65 and older by roughly 75% when given shortly after infection. That’s consistent with earlier results used to authorize the drug in the U.S. and other nations.

But people between the ages of 40 and 65 saw no measurable benefit, according to the analysis of medical records.

The study has limitations due to its design, which compiled data from a large Israeli health system rather than enrolling patients in a randomized study with a control group — the gold-standard for medical research.

The findings reflect the changing nature of the pandemic, in which the vast majority of people already have some protection against the virus due to vaccination or prior infection. For younger adults, in particular, that greatly reduces their risks of severe COVID-19 complications. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently estimated that 95% of Americans 16 and older have acquired some level of immunity against the virus.

“Paxlovid will remain important for people at the highest risk of severe COVID-19, such as seniors and those with compromised immune systems,” said Dr. David Boulware, a University of Minnesota researcher and physician, who was not involved in the study. “But for the vast majority of Americans who are now eligible, this really doesn’t have a lot of benefit.”

A spokesman for Pfizer declined to comment on the results, which were published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized Paxlovid late last year for adults and children 12 and older who are considered high risk due to conditions like obesity, diabetes and heart disease. More than 42% of U.S. adults are considered obese, representing 138 million Americans, according to the CDC.

At the time of the FDA decision there were no options for treating COVID-19 at home, and Paxlovid was considered critical to curbing hospitalizations and deaths during the pandemic’s second winter surge. The drug’s results were also far stronger than a competing pill from Merck.

The FDA made its decision based on a Pfizer study in high-risk patients who hadn’t been vaccinated or treated for prior COVID-19 infection.

“Those people do exist but they’re relatively rare because most people now have either gotten vaccinated or they’ve gotten infected,” Boulware said.

Pfizer reported earlier this summer that a separate study of Paxlovid in healthy adults — vaccinated and unvaccinated — failed to show a significant benefit. Those results have not yet been published in a medical journal.

More than 3.9 million prescriptions for Paxlovid have been filled since the drug was authorized, according to federal records. A treatment course is three pills twice a day for five days.

A White House spokesman on Wednesday pointed to several recent papers suggesting Paxlovid helps reduce hospitalizations among people 50 and older. The studies have not been published in peer-reviewed journals.

“Risk for severe outcomes from COVID is along a gradient, and the growing body of evidence is showing that individuals between the ages of 50 and 64 can also benefit from Paxlovid,” Kevin Munoz said in an emailed statement.

Administration officials have been working for months to increase use of Paxlovid, opening thousands of sites where patients who test positive can fill a prescription. Last month, U.S. officials further expanded access by allowing pharmacists to prescribe the drug.

The White House recently signaled that it may soon stop purchasing COVID-19 vaccines, drugs and tests, shifting responsibility to the private insurance market. Under that scenario, insurers could set new criteria for when they would pay for patients to receive Paxlovid.

___

Follow Matthew Perrone on Twitter: @AP_FDAwriter

___

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education. The AP is solely responsible for all content.



Read original article here

Twitter executives face questions from employees after whistleblower claims

CEO Parag Agrawal opened the company-wide meeting by pushing back on claims made by Peiter “Mudge” Zatko, Twitter’s former head of security. Zatko’s whistleblower disclosure alleges Twitter’s security practices are so poor they pose a threat to national security and democracy and claimed some of the company’s executive team have tried to cover it up.

Agrawal said a “false narrative” has been created about the company, which “is currently challenging our integrity.” He added: “I know that that can be frustrating, and I know it can be challenging.”

Details of the call were shared with CNN by a Twitter employee. A Twitter spokesperson said the meeting was part of its regularly scheduled company-wide meetings, and had been planned before news of the disclosure reached Twitter.

Twitter has pushed back on Zatko’s allegations, which were first reported by CNN and The Washington Post. The company says Zatko’s whistleblower disclosure is “riddled with inconsistencies and inaccuracies and lacks important context.” It also says Zatko was fired for ineffective leadership and poor performance. (Zatko says he was fired in retaliation for internally sounding the alarm on Twitter’s security practices.)

In the meeting Wednesday, Sean Edgett, Twitter’s general counsel, said the company reached out to regulators and “various agencies around the world” when the company learned about the allegations being made by Zatko.

Senator Richard Blumenthal has called on the Federal Trade Commission to open an investigation into Zatko’s allegations. Twitter’s main regulator in Europe, the Irish Data Protection Commission, said it was seeking information from the company in light of the allegations.

Executives were asked if they were going to point-by-point publicly address the many allegations Zatko made about the company.

Rebecca Hahn, the company’s head of global communications, said in the meeting that there were a “number of reasons” why the company had not been able to do this yet — in a possible allusion to the ongoing legal battle between Twitter and its potential future owner Elon Musk.

Hahn, who said she joined the company just over a month ago, said she was inspired by the “level of ethics, passion, and care” throughout Twitter. She assured her colleagues about the company’s public response. “The truth will get out there,” she said. “We’re always on the right side of history on this.”

While Twitter executives did not address all of Zatko’s claims on the call, Chief Privacy Officer Damien Kieran said that some of the allegations were “just not accurate” and listed steps the company has taken to protect laptops and other infrastructure from hacking.

“The idea that the number of incidents that our detection and response team investigates is some indicator of bad or negative impact at Twitter is just false,” Kieran told employees.

However, the two sides appeared to be using different definitions of what constitutes a security incident. Zatkos’s disclosure defined an incident as something “significant enough to trigger interruptions to work” and redirect personnel to determine the scope of the issue. Kieran’s definition appeared to be broader and relatively more benign, describing a security incident as any suspicious digital activity that Twitter’s security team investigates, including activity that doesn’t have any impact on the company’s computer networks or data.

CNN has requested comment from Twitter on the apparent discrepancy in definitions.

Twitter, Kieran also said, instituted greater security controls in the wake of the 2020 hack that compromised celebrity accounts, to the point that “same exact attack can’t happen.” Those security controls include requiring more employees to use “two-factor authentication,” or another layer of security when they log into computer applications.

“Whether or not that’s true, that doesn’t address the many other concerns and security vulnerabilities raised in the lawful disclosure,” John Tye, founder of Whistleblower Aid and Zatko’s lawyer, said in a statement to CNN.

Read original article here

The Ultimate News Site