Category Archives: World

England FA condemn racist abuse aimed at Marcus Rashford, Bukayo Saka, Jadon Sancho after Euro 2020 shootout loss

England’s Football Association released a statement in the early hours of Monday morning condemning the online racist abuse of players following the team’s penalty shootout loss to Italy in Sunday’s Euro 2020 final.

The sides drew 1-1 after extra time, and Italy won the shootout 3-2, with England players Marcus Rashford, Jadon Sancho and Bukayo Saka, who are all Black, missing spot kicks.

– Olley: Spot-kick demons rear head again for England
– Euro 2020 on ESPN: Latest news, features, video
– Euro 2020 on ESPN: Stream LIVE games and replays (U.S. only)

“The FA strongly condemns all forms of discrimination and is appalled by the online racism that has been aimed at some of our England players on social media,” the statement said.

“We could not be clearer that anyone behind such disgusting behaviour is not welcome in following the team. We will do all we can to support the players affected while urging the toughest punishments possible for anyone responsible.”

The England team also released a statement condemning the abuse directed at its players on social media.

“We’re disgusted that some of our squad — who have given everything for the shirt this summer — have been subjected to discriminatory abuse online after tonight’s game,” the team tweeted.

British police said they would investigate the posts.

“We are aware of a number of offensive and racist social media comments being directed towards footballers following the #Euro2020 final,” the Metropolitan Police tweeted.

“This abuse is totally unacceptable, it will not be tolerated and it will be investigated.”

London Mayor Sadiq Khan called on social media companies to remove such content from their platforms.

“Those responsible for the disgusting online abuse we have seen must be held accountable — and social media companies need to act immediately to remove and prevent this hate,” Khan said in a tweet.



Read original article here

Italy’s Victory at Euro 2020 Echoes a Broader Resurgence

ROME — The eruption of sheer joy — and car honking and horn blowing and firework exploding and hugging, so much hugging — across Italy on Sunday after its national men’s soccer team defeated England to win the Euro 2020 tournament marked an extraordinary turnaround, not just for a recently beleaguered team, but also for a recently beleaguered country.

But if Italy’s scrappy, indefatigable and improbably undefeated national team lifted the country’s spirits after multiple lockdowns and incalculable suffering brought by a brutal pandemic, it was only the latest signal of a national resurgence.

Also on Sunday, Matteo Berrettini became the first Italian to play for the men’s singles championship at Wimbledon. Soon before he took the court, Pope Francis showed his face for the first time since undergoing major colon surgery. In May, the Roman rock group Maneskin won the Eurovision song competition. And Khaby Lame, a 21-year-old from near Turin, has one of the world’s most followed accounts on TikTok.

Italy’s fortunes are also looking up in real, and not just symbolic, ways.

In February, a political crisis led the country to ditch its struggling prime minister and allow the accession of Mario Draghi, a former president of the European Central Bank whose exalted international status helped elevate Italy from bit player on the European stage to a driving force. More than half the country has received a vaccination dose; restaurants, bars, parks and beaches have reopened. Billions of euros are headed the country’s way as part of an enormous European coronavirus bailout. Overhauls once thought unimaginable, including the paring of a paralyzing bureaucracy, now seem plausible.

Those substantive changes may have put Italy in a stronger position compared to European neighbors in which political uncertainty and tension abound, but nothing brings the country together, or touches a communal, rapturous nerve, like a big national soccer victory.

The inarticulate screams of Sunday night, its cheers for Leonardo Bonucci’s tying goal in the second half and Gianluigi Donnarumma’s two saves in the penalty shootout, its yelps from Roman balconies, Bergamo piazzas and Sicilian seasides translated into expressions of relief and of life returned.

Even before the game, the country was revved up. The Wimbledon final, in which Mr. Berrettini managed to take a set from Novak Djokovic, was a warm up to the main event. Waiters and waitresses, their faces painted with the Italian colors, served copious amounts of beer to fans waving Italian flags.

The outdoor cinema in the Trastevere section of Rome interrupted its regularly scheduled programming (“A Perfect Day” by Ferzan Ozpetek) for the game, and the turnout was considerably larger, with thousands cramming the square. Fans flooded into the big squares, nuns stood in front of televisions, and families stocked up on flags and air horns.

“She was born on the day Italy won the World Cup,” said Carlo Alberto Pietrangeli, 52, about Ester Aquilani, 15, who wore a flag draped over her shoulders. So did her cousin, Lorenzo Ciurleo, 12, who had refused to wave a flag until the finals for fear of bringing bad luck.

“If we had lost,” he said with a gulp.

But lose they did not, and if anyone expected to get any sleep in the coming days, they could basically forget about it.

If past celebrations, most recently the team’s World Cup victory in 2006, matched Sunday night’s revelry in decibel level, they did not have the emotional undercurrent and pent-up frustration.

“The national team is a symbol of a country that in difficult moments has always known how to get up again,” Roberto Mancini, the team’s coach, said before the tournament began and while Italy was still in lockdown.

That Italy’s soccer team showed the country it could pick itself up, dust itself off and surpass the rest of Europe is remarkable.

In late 2017, Italy failed for the first time in 60 years to qualify for the World Cup, which it has won four times. “National Shame” and “Apocalypse,” read headlines in a country where the game is so central to its national identity and where the humiliation prompted an existential crisis. Months later, an anti-European coalition of Matteo Salvini’s nationalist League party and the populist and anti-establishment Five Star Movement chose Giuseppe Conte, a little-known law professor, to lead the country.

Years of political drama, often mind-boggling incompetence, cozying up to Donald Trump and threatening the European Union followed. Coalitions shifted, but Mr. Conte remained and then, in February 2020, the first major coronavirus outbreak in the West exploded in northern Italy, turning parts of the country into a killing field, paralyzing the economy and forcing vast sections of daily life — including soccer stadiums — to close.

Under Mr. Draghi, about 58 percent of Italians have received at least one dose of a vaccine, and the country’s nationalists and anti-establishment forces have joined his government.

Before the team brought the title home, Mr. Draghi had sought to bring the championship game to Rome.

Last month, he sought to shift the final from Wembley Stadium in London because of the outbreak of the Delta variant there. In a not-so-subtle dig at Prime Minister Boris Johnson of Britain, who supported Brexit, Mr. Draghi suggested moving the final to “a country where new coronavirus infections are not on the rise.”

But no one really expected that Italy and its mostly young and inexperienced team would be playing in the final at Wembley, where Mr. Mancini, during his playing days, lost the 1992 European Cup final with his Sampdoria team against Barcelona.

Nonetheless, the team’s captain, the veteran defender Giorgio Chiellini, had noted that the team had a “chemistry” that was “a kind of magic.” And as the team kept winning, more and more Italians started to believe.

After excruciating penalty kicks and a diving block by Mr. Donnarumma made Italy champions of Europe, England’s fans couldn’t believe it.

The men’s team had not won a major championship or even been to a major final in 55 years, but this team had promise and youth and diversity and a social conscience and seemed to reflect a complex, multicultural England that was sometimes lost in the tribal debates over Brexit. The team united a country that spent much of the last four-and-a-half years arguing with itself over its split with the European Union, and much of the last 15 months under coronavirus-driven lockdowns.

Queen Elizabeth II, who is 95, reminded the team’s manager in a letter that she was on hand 55 years ago to present the World Cup to his predecessor. More than 70 percent of the population of the United Kingdom was born after that championship. And many more will be born before they snap the losing streak.

Tears washed away the English flag Rosie Mayson, 25, had painted on her face.

“I’m devastated,” she said in London, “we didn’t bring it home.”

Veterans of dashed English hopes tried to console younger supporters. “Don’t be sad,” James Mcdonall, 50, told a group of English teenagers. “This is so typically English: the hope, and then to lose in the penalties on a rainy day.”

Fans in Rome needed no consoling. They tore off their shirts, exposing Italian flags on their chests. “It’s us. It’s us,” they chanted in circles, blue fire sticks illuminating their faces. “The champions of Europe are us.”

A river of fans coursed through Rome’s streets, with many climbing traffic lights, dumpsters and each other’s shoulders. Honking cars clogged the streets as if it were a joyous traffic jam. Fireworks illuminated a city that wouldn’t sleep.

“It’s the most beautiful thing of my life,” said Daniele Pace, 20, wearing Italy’s national blue jersey and a flag around his hips. “It’s the best thing that could happen to us after COVID.” He said winning against England was “even better. They are not even part of the European Union.”

The government was a touch more diplomatic.

Mr. Draghi’s press office, usually sober, sent a statement with the green, white and red Italian colors, saying that the prime minister would receive the team tomorrow in his office “to thank them in the name of the entire government.”

As all of Italy celebrated, the team exalted on the field, where they were joined by Mr. Berrettini, the Wimbledon finalist.

Mr. Bonucci called the victory “a dream come true.” He said that England thought the trophy was going home, but instead it was going to Rome. “I’m sorry for them,” he told Italian television after the game. “But once again, Italy gives a lesson.”

Mark Landler and Elian Peltier contributed reporting from London, Emma Bubola from Rome.

Read original article here

Italy erupts in celebration after Euro soccer triumph

ROME, July 11 (Reuters) – Italians poured into streets and squares in massive numbers on Sunday as the national soccer team beat England to win Euro 2020, celebrating a success widely seen as a rebound from the heartbreak failure of not qualifying for the last World Cup.

Fireworks and music broke out across the country after the 3-2 shootout win, following a 1-1 draw after extra time, as flags waved and euphoric fans sang out in the hot summer night after the final played at London’s Wembley stadium. read more

“It’s incredible, it’s incredible, you can’t feel better than this, it is amazing, we won the final,” said Stefano Gucci, a fan in the crowds at Piazza Del Popolo in Rome.

Italians praised national team coach Roberto Mancini for leading the country out of the depths of disappointment when they missed out on qualifying for the 2018 World Cup in Russia and for guiding them to their first Euro title since 1968.

“Great gratitude to Roberto Mancini and our players who have represented Italy well and have brought honour to sports,” President of the Republic Sergio Mattarella said in a statement.

Joy erupted in cities from the north to the south of the country after the final save by Italy goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma fromt Bukayo Saka. Fans filled the central Milan Duomo square and cars beeped their horns in Naples.

Supporters gathered to celebrate also in Jesi, the central Italian hometown of coach Mancini.

“It is very important for Italy, and especially for us,” a fan in Jesi holding a giant Italian flag told SkyTg24.

It is the first major international success for Italian soccer since the 2006 World Cup victory. The ‘Azzurri’ have suffered repeated failures since then, including a crushing defeat against Spain at the Euro 2012 final.

“You have given us a magical night,” said Italian Olympic Committee chief Giovanni Malago.

Italy, where people have suffered during the coronavirus crisis and the deep economic recession provoked by the curbs, has welcomed the success with hope and relief.

“It’s like living in a dream you don’t want to wake up from. Italy has woken up from the nightmare of the pandemic,” said fan Gianluca Iannilli, 25, who is studying to be an interpreter in Rome.

Additional reporting by Crispian Balmer and Gabriele Pileri; Editing by Ken Ferris

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Italy crowned European champion after beating England on penalties

Luke Shaw’s goal inside the opening two minutes gave England a lead it looked like it would hold onto all night, before a goalmouth scramble midway through the second half allowed Leonardo Bonucci to poke home an equalizer for Italy.

For the remainder of the match it felt as though extra-time and penalties were inevitable, as neither side seemed willing or brave enough to commit enough men forward to really trouble the opposing defenders.

England had suffered innumerable heartbreaks on penalties over the years and this time it was Italy’s turn to inflict yet more pain on beleaguered English fans as Marcus Rashford, Jadon Sancho and Bukayo Saka all missed from the spot.

During the wild Italian celebrations, Bonucci — who had been immense all night and rightly earned the man of the match award — screamed “it’s coming to Rome” into the pitch side camera to rub yet more salt into the wounds of English fans.

READ: Security breach’ at Wembley Stadium as small group of people enters venue

England’s wait to end its wretched run in major international competitions, stretching all the way back to 1966, will go for at least another year until the World Cup is hosted in Qatar.

Few would have expected Italy, which failed to qualify for the 2018 World Cup, to reach the final prior to the start of Euro 2020, much less win the entire competition, but Roberto Mancini’s side quickly established itself as one of the contenders after three thrilling group stage performances.

Gianluigi Donnarumma, Italy’s hero in the penalty shootout with two fine saves, was deservedly named the player of the tournament and the goalkeeper heads up a group of talented stars that should ensure this side remains competitive for the foreseeable future.

As for England, this defeat is likely to sting for quite some time to come for players and fans alike, but the squad at least has the consolation of knowing it has provided the country with a tournament run not seen for more than five decades.

Anticipation

Wembley Way, the famous road leading up to England’s national stadium, was heaving as many as seven hours before kick off.

Many of the fans here in the early afternoon didn’t even have tickets, instead choosing to just soak up the atmosphere before moving on to watch the match elsewhere.

The fridges that stocked beer in one of the grocery stores closest to Wembley Stadium were almost completely empty by late morning.

For the vast majority of fans in attendance, this was something they had never experienced in their lifetimes. It had been 55 long years since England was last in a major international final and fans have known only heartache and disappointment since that World Cup triumph in 1966.

One couple considered it such a momentous occasion that they decided to get married on Wembley Way just hours before kick off, both dressed in full wedding attire and holding up England shirts with “Mr” and “Mrs” printed on the back.

Even when cheering on ‘golden generations’ of the past, England fans have never supported their national team with a fervor quite like this. Southgate and this group of players deserve much of the credit for stirring up such a feeling of national pride.

READ: Argentina beat Brazil 1-0 to win Copa America

Stars have regularly used their platform to speak out on social issues and, when it comes to Rashford’s fight against child food poverty, have even managed to reverse government policy.

“I think we’ve got good players and ice boys, but more importantly relatable boys,” English journalist Darren Lewis tells CNN. “I think the secret to the success of this team is that the people in charge of the England team — and I mean the PR team around them — have allowed them to speak on issues that affect them, on issues that people can connect with.

“They’ve allowed them to be normal. I remember being at the 2010 World Cup and England were keeping their players away from everyone, treating them like rock stars. I remember going down to the harbor in South Africa and the Dutch were walking around — they were finalists that year — walking around, talking to people, just enjoying themselves.

“I think this regime who are looking after the team, they realize that it’s important just to let the players be players, let them be men who people can connect with. If you walk through some parts of the crowd, I remember doing it after games and being struck by the diversity in the crowd; black, brown, white.

“Everyone wants to be a part of this England because they identify with [Raheem] Sterling, [Harry] Kane, [Tyrone] Mings, [Jordan] Henderson. They identify with these players because these players aren’t detached. They care about their communities. They care about the people in the places that they come from and that means a lot to the general public.”

Anyone but England?

However, that feeling of goodwill towards the national team seems to extend no further than England’s borders.

Ahead of the final, viral memes have shown a map of Europe covered in Italian flags to signify the support of every other country on the continent.

Much of the animosity towards England and its fans seems to have stemmed from the chant of “football’s coming home,” the chorus of the 1996 song ‘Three Lions’ which has become the national team’s adopted anthem.

The song was released ahead of Euro 96, hosted in England, and is about pessimism and despair, but still feeling hope that the national team may finally end years of heartache.

However, fans of rival countries have interpreted the chant as arrogant and presumptuous, despite multiple attempts to explain its true meaning.

“First of all, there is this ‘It’s coming home, it’s coming home, it’s coming’ that’s banging [on] since the beginning,” Italian journalist Tancredi Palmeri told CNN.

“At the beginning it was nice, but then it sounds like: ‘You owe us,’ like ‘it belongs to us, so you owe us’ and people would say: ‘No, nobody owes you anything and it doesn’t belong to you.

“Just look at the footage of people singing all the time ‘It’s coming home’ for a month. It doesn’t really look like, ‘we are being ironic, being sarcastic.’ It looks like, ‘finally we are getting back what is ours.’ So that is the sentiment [from the outside].”

Some fans outside the stadium certainly didn’t endear themselves to the watching world when they broke through the security barriers in an attempt to get into Wembley before the gates had been opened.

Fast start

In the hour leading up to kick off, Wembley was thundering.

Large swathes of English and Italian fans were mingling throughout the stadium, joining in chorus to belt out a number of songs that have become English anthems during Euro 2020.

By the time the national anthems came around, neither of which were booed by opposition fans, Wembley felt as though its very foundations were rocking.

When Shaw scored, then, with less than two minutes on the clock, the 60,000 or so fans inside the stadium raised the decibels to levels this ground has never heard before.

It was a wonderful move, too, with Shaw getting on the end of Kieran Trippier’s deep cross to the far post to finish off a rapid counterattack.

England certainly hasn’t thrilled with attacking football at this European Championships, instead its success has been built on an organized defense — the best in the tournament — and a smothering midfield.

However, the players perhaps sensed this was an occasion like no other and put Italy on the back foot from the first whistle.

Throughout Euro 2020, this Italian team has somewhat torn up the defensive blueprints that the country’s national team has become synonymous with over the years.

Though it still boasts tremendous defensive leadership and organization in veteran central pairing Bonucci and Gorgio Chiellini, it’s been the more fluid and aggressive attacking style that has caught the eye.

In the first 25 minutes of this contest, however, they had been stifled entirely by an England team that wasn’t affording them a moment’s rest on the ball.

On the rare occasion Italy did enjoy any extended period of possession, boos rang loudly around the stadium and when a foray forward was ended by a wayward pass, England’s fans erupted into rapturous cheers.

Italy was still showing brief flashes of the exciting football that had got it this far — notably through the quick-footed Lorenzo Insigne — but its players were quickly met with a solid white wall whenever they threatened to fashion a sight of goal.

Mancini’s side did create one opening before the half was over through Federico Chiesa, the goal hero from Italy’s semifinal win over Spain, who picked up the ball from deep and drove towards the box, but could only drag his shot wide of Jordan Pickford’s post.

Before the roar that greeted the referee’s half time whistle, for the first time all evening Wembley had quietened down significantly; the first half had gone as perfectly as these fans could have dreamed of, perhaps they were already nervously allowing themselves to believe.

Italy rallies

Less than five minutes into the second half, however, Insigne fired a direct free-kick not too far wide of Pickford’s post just as a prompt reminder that this match was far from over.

With Italy still struggling to create anything from open play, Mancini was forced into making a double substitution after only 50 minutes, bringing on Bryan Cristante and Domenico Berardi for Nicolo Barella the ineffective Ciro Immobile.

The changes had almost the immediate desired impact, as Italy for the first time got in behind England’s back line but Insigne’s shot from a narrow angle was well blocked by Pickford.

That chance rallied the Italian fans congregated behind Pickford’s goal, who had fallen largely silent after their team’s lackluster first half.

This was now without question Italy’s best period of the match so far, for the first time its passing was starting to pull the English defense from one side to another to force some openings.

England soon retaliated, however, with John Stones rising highest in the area to head Trippier’s corner towards goal and force Gianluigi Donnarumma to tip the ball over the crossbar.

But Italy soon got the goal its improved performance deserved.

Berardi’s corner to the far post somehow found its way to Marco Verratti, who saw his shot saved excellently onto the post by Pickford, but Bonucci was in the right place at the right time to tap the rebound into an empty net.

Now it was the turn of the Italian fans to fill Wembley with noise, as England’s supporters descended into a nervous silence with their team now on the back foot.

The minor capitulation forced Gareth Southgate into making his first substitutions, as Saka and Henderson replaced Trippier and Declan Rice.

It so nearly went from bad to worse for England as Bonucci’s raking long ball found Berardi bearing down on goal, but the forward could only send his volley over the crossbar.

England now seemed to be doubting everything that had helped them reach the final; Maguire, normally assured in defense, hacked a desperate clearance away under no pressure at all, while Kane’s passes began falling short of their desired target.

It was almost as if, for the first time all tournament, the magnitude of the occasion had finally started to dawn on these England players.

The game was on a knife edge as it entered the final 10 minutes, though Italian fans would certainly have been more confident than their English counterparts of snatching a win.

Extra time continued in much the same vein with neither side able to stamp its authority on proceedings, both perhaps too nervous to commit at this late stage.

Southgate threw on Rashford, 23, and Sancho, 21, for the penalty shootout but both men went on to miss as England suffered an all too familiar fate.

Read original article here

Pro-West party leads Moldova election, preliminary data shows

  • West, Russia vie for influence in impoverished ex-Soviet state
  • Pro-Western president hopes to win majority to tackle graft
  • Accuses outgoing parliament of blocking economic reforms
  • Ex-president Dodon’s allies say pro-West camp threaten state

CHISINAU, July 11 (Reuters) – Pro-Western Moldovan President Maya Sandu’s PAS party was leading snap parliamentary elections on Sunday, data from the central election commission showed, on a platform of fighting corruption and carrying out reforms.

Sandu hopes to win a majority in the 101-seat chamber to implement reforms she says were blocked by allies of her pro-Russian predecessor, Igor Dodon.

After the counting 37.16% of ballots, PAS had 42.34% of the vote, while its main rival, Dodon’s Socialists and Communists bloc, had 33.86%, the data showed.

Preliminary results are likely to be announced on Monday.

The West and Russia vie for influence in the tiny ex-Soviet republic of 3.5 million people, which is one of Europe’s poorest nations and has suffered a sharp economic downturn during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sandu, a former World Bank economist who favours closer ties with the European Union, defeated Dodon last year but was forced to share power with the parliament elected in 2019 and the government run by lawmakers aligned with Dodon.

In April, Sandu dissolved parliament, in which PAS had 15 lawmakers while Dodon’s Socialists had 37 and together with allies he controlled a majority of 54 deputies.

“I’ve voted for a new parliament with honest people who will allow us to get rid of those who have robbed Moldova all these years,” Sandu said after the vote.

“I urge citizens to vote and take another step towards cleaning Moldova of thieves and the corrupt,” said Sandu, who wants to overhaul the judicial system, increase salaries and amend the constitution to make it easier to punish graft.

Moldova, sandwiched between Ukraine and EU member Romania, has been dogged by instability and corruption scandals in recent years, including the disappearance of $1 billion from the banking system.

Dodon, a regular guest in Moscow, has formed an electoral bloc with the communists who have accused Sandu of pursuing a pro-Western policy that would lead to the collapse of the state.

“It depends on our voice today who will rule Moldova tomorrow. I urge you to vote for professionals, patriots of Moldova, and not those who will put Moldova under external control,” Dodon said after the vote.

Writing by Pavel Polityuk; Editing by Gareth Jones, William Mallard and Raissa Kasolowsky

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Protests erupt in Georgia after beaten journalist dies

TBILISI, Georgia (AP) — Several thousand people protested in front of the Georgian parliament on Sunday evening, demanding that the ex-Soviet nation’s prime minister resign over the death of a journalist who was attacked and beaten by anti-LGBT protesters.

Cameraman Alexander Lashkarava was found dead in his home by his mother earlier Sunday, according to the TV Pirveli channel he worked for. Lashkarava was one of several dozen journalists attacked last Monday by opponents of an LGBT march that had been scheduled to take place that day in the Georgian capital of Tbilisi.

Organizers of the Tbilisi March For Dignity cancelled the event, saying authorities had not provided adequate security guarantees. Opponents of the march blocked off the capital’s main avenue, denounced journalists covering the protest as pro-LGBT propagandists and threw sticks and bottles at them.

Lashkarava, according to his colleague Miranda Baghaturia, was beaten by a mob of 20 people. Local TV channels later showed him with bruises on his face and blood on the floor around him. Media reports say he sustained multiple injuries and had to undergo surgery but was discharged from a hospital on Thursday.

The cause of his death was not immediately clear.

Police launched an investigation into Lashkarava’s death, which Georgia’s Prime Minister Irakli Garibashvili and President Salome Zurabishvili both described as “a tragedy.”

Animosity against sexual minorities is strong in the conservative Black Sea nation of Georgia.

The Tbilisi Pride group said Monday that opponents of the planned march were supported by the government and by the Georgian Orthodox Church. The Open Caucasus Media group published a photo of a man it said was a local TV journalist being pulled away from the scene in a headlock by an Orthodox priest.

Zurabishvili condemned the violence, but Garibashvili alleged the march was organized by “radical opposition” forces that he claimed were led by exiled former President Mikheil Saakashvili.

A large crowd of protesters that gathered in Tbilisi on Sunday demanded that authorities punish those responsible for the attack on journalists and urged Garibashvili to step down. Some protesters blamed the prime minister for enabling the violence by publicly denouncing the LGBT march.

Read original article here

Ra’am threatens coalition over Joint List talks

One month into Prime Minister Naftali Bennett’s government, the Ra’am (United Arab List) Party threatened to stop supporting the coalition on Sunday due to talks with the rival Joint List.

Yesh Atid leader Yair Lapid and Blue and White chairman Benny Gantz had approached Joint List leaders about providing a parliamentary safety net from the opposition on the state budget and other key legislation.

This angered Ra’am MKs, who do not want to share credit with their rivals for any funding brought to the Arab sector. In a tweet Sunday morning, Ra’am faction chairman Walid Taha said he had informed the coalition that Ra’am would not participate in committee meetings or vote on laws until further notice.

Ra’am leader Mansour Abbas initially denied that the crisis was over the rift with his party’s nemesis and stressed that it was only over professional considerations impacting his Arab-Israeli constituency.

“Ra’am is pushing the government and the ministries to make practical decisions for Arab society,” he wrote on social media. “What is happening between our party and the government coalition has no connection whatsoever to the Joint List. Ra’am has decided that its business plan with the government is a true and transparent partnership that respects the stature of Arab citizens and the party’s right to impact the government’s policies so its decisions will be better for us. Arab citizens are tired of being bench players on the side and under the table, which has harmed the stature of Arab citizens and their political achievements.”

But later, in coalition talks with cabinet secretary Shalom Shlomo, Taha demanded that all future negotiations with the Joint List and any concessions be preapproved by Ra’am.

“If Naftali Bennett doesn’t change his direction, there won’t be a coalition,” a source in Ra’am said.

Ra’am also demanded an interministerial committee on Arab issues, a task force on house demolitions and better representation for Ra’am on Knesset committees. In an effort to satisfy Ra’am, the cabinet approved its request to move the National Authority on the Bedouin Population to the Welfare and Social Services Ministry, which was already agreed upon in the coalition agreement.

The opposition mocked Bennett for giving in to Ra’am’s demands.

“In order to survive as prime minister with only six mandates, Bennett once again surrendered to Mansour Abbas and sold out the Negev to him,” the Likud said in a tweet retweeted by former prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “It will be interesting to see what else will be extorted out of him to stay in power.”

Religious Zionist Party MK Itamar Ben-Gvir accused Bennett of “moral bankruptcy and giving a prize to terrorism.”



Read original article here

Can you catch two COVID variants at once? Experts warn it’s possible

Experts are warning that it is possible to be infected with two different variants of coronavirus after a 90-year-old woman from Belgium was found to have both the Alpha and Beta variants of COVID-19.

The woman passed away from COVID in March in Belgium. She had not been vaccinated. She lived alone and was receiving nursing care at home before contracting the virus and being evacuated to the OLV Hospital in Aalst.

According to the BBC, her doctors believe that she contracted the dual infections from two different people.

The strange case will be discussed at the European Congress on Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, but has not yet been formally published in a peer-reviewed journal.

“Both these variants were circulating in Belgium at the time, so it is likely that the lady was co-infected with different viruses from two different people,” said OLV Hospital’s molecular biologist and lead author of the study Anne Vankeerberghen.

The woman’s medical history was “unremarkable,” according to a press release. After being hospitalized, she tested positive for COVID-19. Her respiratory symptoms quickly worsened and she passed away five days after being evacuated to the hospital.

Her respiratory sample was tested post-mortem and was found to have both the Alpha and Beta variants of COVID-19.

“Since co-infections with variants of concern can only be detected by VOC-analysis of positive samples, we would encourage scientists to perform fast, easy and cheap VOC-analysis by PCR on a large proportion of their positive samples, rather than just whole genome sequencing on a small proportion,” Vankeerberghen said. “Independent of the technique used, being alert to co-infections remains crucial.”



Read original article here

Privacy Is Still a Victim When Rape Cases Hit the Justice System

Things were supposed to be different this time, Brooke thought in disbelief as the police officer demanded that she hand over every scrap of data on her phone to investigators — not because she was suspected of a crime, but because she was the victim of one. Years earlier, a man who Brooke had until then considered a friend pulled her into a London alley, pushed her against a wall, choked her and violently sexually assaulted her. Her fear and humiliation, more than just the invasion of her body, seemed to be his goal. Several times, she said, she broke free, only to have him catch her, throw her back against the wall, and assault her again.

She reported the attack to the police, who were initially supportive, she said. But then they closed her case after she refused to submit to a “digital strip search” — Britain’s policy of requiring victims of sex crimes to give the police full access to their phone data, social media accounts, school records and even therapists’ notes.

“I always assumed before any of this ever happened to me that the assault would have been the most traumatic thing that could happen,” said Brooke, an actress living in London. (The Times is not using her full name because she is a victim of sexual assault.) But in fact, she said, she found the experience of reporting the crime to the police, only to be treated like a suspect to be investigated herself, far worse.

Fewer than 2 percent of rape cases reported to the police in Britain are ever prosecuted. And the digital strip search is just one of the many policies that a recent government report criticized as contributing to the justice system’s catastrophic failures on rape and sexual assault.

Brooke’s experience is a microcosm of the ways that efforts to address those failures, though fueled by unprecedented public demand for change in the post-#MeToo era, are doomed unless they reckon with the societal and institutional conditions that created them in the first place.

And that, some experts now argue, may require radically reshaping the justice system itself — going so far as to question the role of juries, victims, and more.

There has been some progress in Britain, at least when it comes to setting policy. Following an appeals court ruling that the police could only take data pursuant to “reasonable lines of inquiry,” the government prosecutors’ body announced in May that sex-crime victims would no longer be subjected to the digital strip search.

After the court ruling, Brooke asked for her case to be reopened — only to be told that despite the rule changes on paper, nothing had changed for her. If she did not hand over her data, they would not proceed with her case.

The struggle is not limited to Britain. In the United States last week, the rape conviction of Bill Cosby was vacated on procedural grounds. Because Mr. Cosby’s prosecution was one of a handful of cases that had been hailed as a sign that the justice system was finally taking rape and sexual assault seriously, his walking free has led many to question whether the societal reckoning of #MeToo can translate into actual prosecutions and protections.

Kate Ellis, an attorney with the Centre for Women’s Justice, a London legal charity, has represented Brooke in her fight to change the rules so that she and other survivors could press charges without having to give up their privacy. But she said that she is also sympathetic to the bind that police officers find themselves in now that the digital strip search has officially been retired, but the same incentives that led to its creation in the first place are still present.

The thing to understand, she said, is that police officers and prosecutors bear few consequences when they close a case for lack of evidence, or because victims stop cooperating. But if they do bring a case that falls apart or fails, they can face serious blowback.

“So a victim who is not perfect, or who’s ever been dishonest, there’s a feeling of, you know, why prosecute the case?” she said in an interview.

The Crown Prosecution Service has denied that it is risk averse in deciding which cases to prosecute. During Parliamentary testimony in June, Max Hill, the Director of Public Prosecutions, seemed to pin the blame on the police, saying that his prosecutors were willing to bring any case where the legal test was met, but that too few cases were ever being referred for prosecution because “something is going wrong at a very early stage.”

But the two are not separate. Police often demand extensive digital evidence because they believe that prosecutors won’t proceed without it.

And the reason for that unwillingness, Ms. Ellis has found in her work with sexual assault victims, is that the police are afraid they will be blamed for failing to disclose evidence.

In Britain, like the United States, police officers and prosecutors have a legal obligation to disclose any evidence that might be relevant to the defense. In 2017, a high-profile rape prosecution of a British university student fell apart several days into the trial after the police admitted that they had failed to hand over thousands of messages to the defense that had been found on the alleged victim’s phone.

The case collapse provoked a furor. The Crown Prosecution Service publicly apologized, and announced a review of 600 other cases to ensure that similar errors would not be made.

There is the broader cultural problem to deal with, as well. It is still common for defense lawyers in sexual assault cases to attack the victims’ credibility, claiming that the encounter in question was consensual, or never happened. Just as common are efforts to appeal to jurors’ beliefs in “rape myths” — sexist yet still widespread beliefs about sexual assault, such as that women commonly make false rape allegations, that rapes must fit into a stereotype of “real” rape to be believable, or that men cannot control their sexual urges and should not bear the consequences of failure to do so.

Evidence rules do bar some rape myth-based defenses in theory, such as the introduction of information about the victim’s sexual history. But the restrictions are limited and often ineffective. In practice, research shows, defense lawyers often rely heavily on rape myths in shaping their arguments to the jury.

And it works.

“There’s so much evidence just from mock jury studies and other research that juries don’t convict in cases where they should be convicting,” said Fiona Leverick, a law professor at the University of Glasgow who studies rape myths. “And the main reason for that is just they believe in rape myths.”

Risk-averse police officers, Ms. Ellis said, seem to be under the impression that they are obligated to trawl through victims’ personal history to look for evidence relevant to anything that the defendant might raise — including their personal relationships, sexual history and more.

The problem, in other words, is that changing any one part of the flawed system requires changing the other parts of the system that created and perpetuated the problem.

To stop subjecting rape victims to the digital strip search means addressing police incentives to investigate victims first and foremost, which in turn requires addressing prosecutors’ risk aversion when it comes to disclosure to the defense, which in turn requires addressing the role of rape myths in the courtroom, which in turn requires addressing the widespread belief in rape myths within society itself.

And while the digital strip search is specific to Britain, every country wrestling with the legacy of #MeToo is facing similar issues. A recent study found that belief in rape myths is prevalent in the United States, too, with all the attendant implications for how it might affect the jury pool, prosecutors’ decisions, and police investigations under the specific circumstances of the American judicial system.

With the release of its end-to-end rape review, which focused on England and Wales, the British government has promised more resources for the police and prosecutors, and more training, with the goal of increasing the prosecution rate.

But some experts say that the promised changes will be inadequate, and are arguing for more significant changes.

Scotland’s equivalent of the end-to-end rape review, an independent commission led by Leeona Dorrian, the Lord Justice Clerk, recommended that Scotland should test out doing away with juries in rape cases altogether to avoid having jurors’ prejudices, and belief in rape myths, affect the outcomes of trials.

“The traditional arguments in favor of juries are met by equally compelling arguments for trial by judge alone, which cannot be left unexamined and ignored,” the report concluded.

In the meantime, thousands of victims of rape and sexual assault feel powerless to move the system to act. Brooke’s experience with the police has left her feeling that “it’s not a matter of if I’m assaulted again, it’s when,” she said.

“There’s absolutely no one to help me when that happens. It makes me feel really scared.”

Read original article here

Georgian cameraman dies after attack by far-right, anti-LGBTQ mob | Georgia

A Georgian TV cameraman has died after being badly beaten by far-right assailants during a protest against an LGBTQ Pride march, his station said on Sunday, as pressure mounts on authorities over attacks on journalists.

Alexander Lashkarava, a 37-year-old cameraman working for the independent station TV Pirveli, was found dead in his bed in the early hours on Sunday, the channel reported.

Last Monday he was assaulted by a violent mob of anti-LGBTQ protesters and sustained fractures to his facial bones.

More than 50 journalists were attacked that day by anti-LGBTQ groups protesting against the planned Pride march in Tbilisi, which was cancelled due to safety fears.

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) condemned the attacks, saying journalists “sustained injuries that included concussion, chemical burns and broken arms”.

It accused authorities of “culpable passivity” and said police had failed to protect journalists.

Georgia’s interior ministry said in a brief statement on Sunday that an investigation had been opened into Lashkarava’s death.

Rights activists announced a protest rally later on Sunday to demand the resignation of the prime minister, Irakli Garibashvili.

Prominent Georgian TV personalities and managers have accused Garibashvili’s government of orchestrating a violent campaign against journalists.

“The government not only encourages violence against journalists, it is part of the violence,” Nodar Meladze, TV Pirveli’s news editor, told AFP.

“The government has set up violent groups to attack independent media,” he said, adding: “Riot police have also repeatedly targeted journalists.”

In June 2019, riot police injured 40 journalists covering an anti-government protest.

Garibashvili has faced strong criticism from the opposition and rights activists after he spoke out against holding the Pride march, describing it as “unacceptable for a large segment of Georgian society”.

Critics have accused the ruling Georgian Dream party of tacitly supporting homophobic and nationalist groups, which have also staged protests against pro-western opposition parties.

Read original article here