Category Archives: US

Live Updates: Kyle Rittenhouse Found Not Guilty on All Counts

KENOSHA, Wis. — Kyle Rittenhouse, who fatally shot two men and wounded another amid protests and rioting over police conduct in Kenosha, Wis., was found not guilty of homicide and other charges on Friday, in a deeply divisive case that ignited a national debate over vigilantism, gun rights and the definition of self-defense.

After about 26 hours of deliberation, a jury appeared to accept Mr. Rittenhouse’s explanation that he had acted reasonably to defend himself in an unruly and turbulent scene in August 2020, days after a white police officer shot Jacob Blake, a Black resident, during a summer of unrest following the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer.

Mr. Rittenhouse, 18, sobbed and was held by his lawyers after the jury finished reading their verdict.

After the shootings, Mr. Rittenhouse was transformed from an unknown 17-year-old from rural Illinois into a symbol. Some Americans were horrified by the images of a teenager toting a powerful semiautomatic rifle on a city street during racial justice demonstrations, a reminder of the extent of open carry laws in the United States. Others saw a well-meaning young man who had gone to keep the peace and provide medical aid, a response to the sometimes violent protests that had roiled American cities in the summer of 2020.

Credit…Carlos Javier Ortiz for The New York Times

“So many people look at this case and they see what they want to see,” Thomas Binger, the prosecutor in the trial, had cautioned jurors before they began deliberations. The trial had grown so politicized that conservative groups raised money for Mr. Rittenhouse’s defense, and small factions of protesters — including gun rights’ supporters and racial justice demonstrators — had awaited the verdict on the courthouse steps.

As the verdict was read, Mr. Rittenhouse’s mother and sisters cried, and friends and family of the men Mr. Rittenhouse shot clutched each other. Outside, quiet gave way to shouts from supporters of Mr. Rittenhouse. Gov. Tony Evers had prepared for any unrest after the verdict by authorizing 500 Wisconsin Army National Guard troops.

On Aug. 25, 2020, Mr. Rittenhouse arrived in downtown Kenosha with his rifle and a medical kit on the third day of civil unrest over the shooting of Mr. Blake by Officer Rusten Sheskey in the former factory town of 100,000 residents. (In January, prosecutors announced they were not charging Officer Sheskey with wrongdoing.) Demonstrators marched peacefully at points, but some smashed streetlamps and set cars and shops on fire. Law enforcement was overwhelmed, and dozens of civilians took up their own firearms to guard businesses and subdivisions, adding to a tense and chaotic atmosphere that included sparring between the groups.

Testimony and video footage shown during the two-week trial revealed that Mr. Rittenhouse was chased into a parking lot, at one point, by Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, who was unarmed and behaving erratically. Mr. Rittenhouse turned and shot him at close range, killing Mr. Rosenbaum, who had been living in Kenosha.

Credit…Pool photo by Sean Krajacic

Mr. Rittenhouse then shot two other people — Anthony Huber and Gaige Grosskreutz — who pursued Mr. Rittenhouse as he fled, testimony showed. Mr. Grosskreutz, a medic from the Milwaukee suburbs, survived and testified at the trial, saying that he had pulled out a gun because he believed that Mr. Rittenhouse was an active shooter. Mr. Huber, who was 26 and had been protesting the shooting of Mr. Blake — a longtime friend — died after a gunshot to the chest.

Over the course of the trial, prosecutors sought to portray Mr. Rittenhouse, a former resident of Antioch, Ill., as an instigator who had behaved with criminal recklessness, inserting himself into a volatile scene of demonstrators and then firing his gun with little provocation.

There was chaos that night in Kenosha, Mr. Binger the prosecutor, told the jury in his opening statement. But “the only one who killed anyone,” he said, “was the defendant, Kyle Rittenhouse.”

At the heart of the case, though, was a fight over what acts qualify as self-defense. Wisconsin law allows deadly force to be used if a person “reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself,” and in the state there is no duty to retreat before using force.

The prosecution struggled to undermine Mr. Rittenhouse’s central defense: that he had feared for his life when he was chased by Mr. Rosenbaum, a man who had been captured on video throughout the evening shouting threats and racial epithets and — according to Mr. Rittenhouse and a witness called by the prosecution — had promised to kill Mr. Rittenhouse if he found him alone. Mr. Rosenbaum had been released that day from a hospital where he had received psychiatric care and was treated for bipolar disorder and depression, testimony showed.

Credit…Pool photo by Sean Krajacic

It was Mr. Rosenbaum, a defense lawyer, Mark Richards, said in his opening statement, who “lit the fuse” that night, “trying to take Kyle’s weapon from him to use against him.”

Still, in testimony, some people who had observed Mr. Rosenbaum, who was 5-foot-4, downplayed the danger that they perceived from him that night. Jason Lackowski, a former Marine and resident of Green Bay, Wis., who said he had traveled to Kenosha with a gun, knife and other weapons to “come down and help in any way we could, to protect local property” in the city, testified that he saw Mr. Rosenbaum as “a babbling idiot.”

Perhaps the closest witness to the encounter was Richie McGinniss, a videographer for The Daily Caller, a prosecution witness whose testimony was helpful in establishing a crucial detail for the defense: He said Mr. Rosenbaum had reached for the barrel of Mr. Rittenhouse’s rifle just before Mr. Rittenhouse fired.

“It was clear to me it was a situation where it was likely something dangerous was going to happen, be it Mr. Rosenbaum grabbing it or Mr. Rittenhouse shooting it,” Mr. McGinniss said on the stand.

Mr. McGinniss also became emotional in the courtroom as he described the trauma of the shootings and his fear when he realized he might have been struck by a bullet. After hearing the gunshots only feet away, Mr. McGinniss said, he stamped his legs on the ground to make sure that he had not been wounded.

Credit…Carlos Javier Ortiz for The New York Times

Mr. Rittenhouse had faced five felonies, including first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide and attempted first-degree intentional homicide. A sixth charge, for illegal possession of the rifle, was dismissed by Judge Bruce Schroeder after defense lawyers argued that Mr. Rittenhouse did not violate the state statute in question because of his age and the length of the barrel of his semiautomatic rifle. The gun was purchased by Dominick Black, a friend of Mr. Rittenhouse’s, because Mr. Rittenhouse was 17 years old and not legally old enough to buy it, testimony showed.

The trial, which took place in the courthouse in Kenosha that was shuttered and heavily barricaded during the unrest in August 2020, was marked by angry clashes over judicial procedure between the judge and lawyers, particularly the prosecutor, Mr. Binger.

Last week, the defense moved for a mistrial, suggesting that Mr. Binger — who had introduced questions on a topic that the judge had previously said was off-limits — was intentionally sabotaging the trial to avoid an acquittal.

Judge Schroeder, the longest-serving circuit court judge in Wisconsin, insisted that he wanted to keep politics out of his courtroom, scolding a prospective juror during jury selection who declared that his belief in the Second Amendment made him biased in favor of Mr. Rittenhouse. But the judge also drew attention on Veterans Day for the unusual step of prompting the jury to applaud a defense witness — a veteran — and for periodically launching into meandering asides for the jury on legal theory, Roman history and the Bible.

Jurors heard from dozens of witnesses, including women close to the men who had been shot dead; other armed people who had joined Mr. Rittenhouse on Kenosha streets that night; and witnesses who had livestreamed the shootings. In the most closely watched day of the trial, Mr. Rittenhouse testified in his own defense.

Credit…Carlos Javier Ortiz for The New York Times

His testimony began on an emotional note: He burst into tears as he recalled the night of the shootings, prompting the judge to call a recess. But for most of Mr. Rittenhouse’s time on the witness stand, he delivered a calm account, saying that he had brought a gun to downtown Kenosha for protection, did not plan to fire it and only did so when he feared for his life.

Mr. Grosskreutz, the only survivor of Mr. Rittenhouse’s gunshots, described the chaotic scene on the stand after he heard the first several shots ring out. Mr. Grosskreutz testified that he ran in the direction of the gunfire, determined to help people who had been injured. Within moments, he encountered Mr. Rittenhouse, fleeing down the street holding his rifle, and began to follow in his direction, holding a pistol Mr. Grosskreutz had brought.

When Mr. Huber gave chase and swung a skateboard at Mr. Rittenhouse’s head, Mr. Rittenhouse shot Mr. Huber in the chest. Mr. Grosskreutz continued to approach, he said in his testimony, first with his gun pointed in the air, then in the direction of Mr. Rittenhouse.

“I was never trying to kill the defendant,” he said. “In that moment, I was trying to preserve my own life.”

Read original article here

Live Updates: Kyle Rittenhouse Found Not Guilty on All Counts

KENOSHA, Wis. — Kyle Rittenhouse, who fatally shot two men and wounded another amid protests and rioting over police conduct in Kenosha, Wis., was found not guilty of homicide and other charges on Friday, in a deeply divisive case that ignited a national debate over vigilantism, gun rights and the definition of self-defense.

After about 26 hours of deliberation, a jury appeared to accept Mr. Rittenhouse’s explanation that he had acted reasonably to defend himself in an unruly and turbulent scene in August 2020, days after a white police officer shot Jacob Blake, a Black resident, during a summer of unrest following the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer.

Mr. Rittenhouse, 18, sobbed and was held by his lawyers after the jury finished reading their verdict.

After the shootings, Mr. Rittenhouse was transformed from an unknown 17-year-old from rural Illinois into a symbol. Some Americans were horrified by the images of a teenager toting a powerful semiautomatic rifle on a city street during racial justice demonstrations, a reminder of the extent of open carry laws in the United States. Others saw a well-meaning young man who had gone to keep the peace and provide medical aid, a response to the sometimes violent protests that had roiled American cities in the summer of 2020.

Credit…Carlos Javier Ortiz for The New York Times

“So many people look at this case and they see what they want to see,” Thomas Binger, the prosecutor in the trial, had cautioned jurors before they began deliberations. The trial had grown so politicized that conservative groups raised money for Mr. Rittenhouse’s defense, and small factions of protesters — including gun rights’ supporters and racial justice demonstrators — had awaited the verdict on the courthouse steps.

As the verdict was read, Mr. Rittenhouse’s mother and sisters cried, and friends and family of the men Mr. Rittenhouse shot clutched each other. Outside, quiet gave way to shouts from supporters of Mr. Rittenhouse. Gov. Tony Evers had prepared for any unrest after the verdict by authorizing 500 Wisconsin Army National Guard troops.

On Aug. 25, 2020, Mr. Rittenhouse arrived in downtown Kenosha with his rifle and a medical kit on the third day of civil unrest over the shooting of Mr. Blake by Officer Rusten Sheskey in the former factory town of 100,000 residents. (In January, prosecutors announced they were not charging Officer Sheskey with wrongdoing.) Demonstrators marched peacefully at points, but some smashed streetlamps and set cars and shops on fire. Law enforcement was overwhelmed, and dozens of civilians took up their own firearms to guard businesses and subdivisions, adding to a tense and chaotic atmosphere that included sparring between the groups.

Testimony and video footage shown during the two-week trial revealed that Mr. Rittenhouse was chased into a parking lot, at one point, by Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, who was unarmed and behaving erratically. Mr. Rittenhouse turned and shot him at close range, killing Mr. Rosenbaum, who had been living in Kenosha.

Credit…Pool photo by Sean Krajacic

Mr. Rittenhouse then shot two other people — Anthony Huber and Gaige Grosskreutz — who pursued Mr. Rittenhouse as he fled, testimony showed. Mr. Grosskreutz, a medic from the Milwaukee suburbs, survived and testified at the trial, saying that he had pulled out a gun because he believed that Mr. Rittenhouse was an active shooter. Mr. Huber, who was 26 and had been protesting the shooting of Mr. Blake — a longtime friend — died after a gunshot to the chest.

Over the course of the trial, prosecutors sought to portray Mr. Rittenhouse, a former resident of Antioch, Ill., as an instigator who had behaved with criminal recklessness, inserting himself into a volatile scene of demonstrators and then firing his gun with little provocation.

There was chaos that night in Kenosha, Mr. Binger the prosecutor, told the jury in his opening statement. But “the only one who killed anyone,” he said, “was the defendant, Kyle Rittenhouse.”

At the heart of the case, though, was a fight over what acts qualify as self-defense. Wisconsin law allows deadly force to be used if a person “reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself,” and in the state there is no duty to retreat before using force.

The prosecution struggled to undermine Mr. Rittenhouse’s central defense: that he had feared for his life when he was chased by Mr. Rosenbaum, a man who had been captured on video throughout the evening shouting threats and racial epithets and — according to Mr. Rittenhouse and a witness called by the prosecution — had promised to kill Mr. Rittenhouse if he found him alone. Mr. Rosenbaum had been released that day from a hospital where he had received psychiatric care and was treated for bipolar disorder and depression, testimony showed.

Credit…Pool photo by Sean Krajacic

It was Mr. Rosenbaum, a defense lawyer, Mark Richards, said in his opening statement, who “lit the fuse” that night, “trying to take Kyle’s weapon from him to use against him.”

Still, in testimony, some people who had observed Mr. Rosenbaum, who was 5-foot-4, downplayed the danger that they perceived from him that night. Jason Lackowski, a former Marine and resident of Green Bay, Wis., who said he had traveled to Kenosha with a gun, knife and other weapons to “come down and help in any way we could, to protect local property” in the city, testified that he saw Mr. Rosenbaum as “a babbling idiot.”

Perhaps the closest witness to the encounter was Richie McGinniss, a videographer for The Daily Caller, a prosecution witness whose testimony was helpful in establishing a crucial detail for the defense: He said Mr. Rosenbaum had reached for the barrel of Mr. Rittenhouse’s rifle just before Mr. Rittenhouse fired.

“It was clear to me it was a situation where it was likely something dangerous was going to happen, be it Mr. Rosenbaum grabbing it or Mr. Rittenhouse shooting it,” Mr. McGinniss said on the stand.

Mr. McGinniss also became emotional in the courtroom as he described the trauma of the shootings and his fear when he realized he might have been struck by a bullet. After hearing the gunshots only feet away, Mr. McGinniss said, he stamped his legs on the ground to make sure that he had not been wounded.

Credit…Carlos Javier Ortiz for The New York Times

Mr. Rittenhouse had faced five felonies, including first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide and attempted first-degree intentional homicide. A sixth charge, for illegal possession of the rifle, was dismissed by Judge Bruce Schroeder after defense lawyers argued that Mr. Rittenhouse did not violate the state statute in question because of his age and the length of the barrel of his semiautomatic rifle. The gun was purchased by Dominick Black, a friend of Mr. Rittenhouse’s, because Mr. Rittenhouse was 17 years old and not legally old enough to buy it, testimony showed.

The trial, which took place in the courthouse in Kenosha that was shuttered and heavily barricaded during the unrest in August 2020, was marked by angry clashes over judicial procedure between the judge and lawyers, particularly the prosecutor, Mr. Binger.

Last week, the defense moved for a mistrial, suggesting that Mr. Binger — who had introduced questions on a topic that the judge had previously said was off-limits — was intentionally sabotaging the trial to avoid an acquittal.

Judge Schroeder, the longest-serving circuit court judge in Wisconsin, insisted that he wanted to keep politics out of his courtroom, scolding a prospective juror during jury selection who declared that his belief in the Second Amendment made him biased in favor of Mr. Rittenhouse. But the judge also drew attention on Veterans Day for the unusual step of prompting the jury to applaud a defense witness — a veteran — and for periodically launching into meandering asides for the jury on legal theory, Roman history and the Bible.

Jurors heard from dozens of witnesses, including women close to the men who had been shot dead; other armed people who had joined Mr. Rittenhouse on Kenosha streets that night; and witnesses who had livestreamed the shootings. In the most closely watched day of the trial, Mr. Rittenhouse testified in his own defense.

Credit…Carlos Javier Ortiz for The New York Times

His testimony began on an emotional note: He burst into tears as he recalled the night of the shootings, prompting the judge to call a recess. But for most of Mr. Rittenhouse’s time on the witness stand, he delivered a calm account, saying that he had brought a gun to downtown Kenosha for protection, did not plan to fire it and only did so when he feared for his life.

Mr. Grosskreutz, the only survivor of Mr. Rittenhouse’s gunshots, described the chaotic scene on the stand after he heard the first several shots ring out. Mr. Grosskreutz testified that he ran in the direction of the gunfire, determined to help people who had been injured. Within moments, he encountered Mr. Rittenhouse, fleeing down the street holding his rifle, and began to follow in his direction, holding a pistol Mr. Grosskreutz had brought.

When Mr. Huber gave chase and swung a skateboard at Mr. Rittenhouse’s head, Mr. Rittenhouse shot Mr. Huber in the chest. Mr. Grosskreutz continued to approach, he said in his testimony, first with his gun pointed in the air, then in the direction of Mr. Rittenhouse.

“I was never trying to kill the defendant,” he said. “In that moment, I was trying to preserve my own life.”

Read original article here

Kyle Rittenhouse trial verdict – live: Kenosha shooter found not guilty as Republican says ‘be armed’

Kyle Rittenhouse found not guilty on all charges in homicide trial

Kyle Rittenhouse has been found not guilty on all counts in his homicide trial, after four days of tense jury deliberations. The 18-year-old became visibly emotional as the verdict was read, seeming to cry and hyperventilate before hugging one of his attorneys. It’s the latest stunning development in a story full of shocking moments.

Conservative politicians around the country celebrated the decision, with GOP congressman Madison Cawthorn offering Mr Rittenhouse an internship, and telling supporters to “be armed, be dangerous, and be moral” while exercising the right to self-defense.

Others, like writer and critic Roxane Gay, said the decision “emboldens white supremacist vigilantes.”

The White House on Friday said it was in touch with law officials in Kenosha, Wisconsin, about the controversial verdict, with press secretary Jen Psaki telling reporters, “We are supporting any effort towards peaceful protests.”

The drama began before a verdict was even reached. On Thursday, Judge Bruce Schroeder barred MSNBC from covering the trial inside the courthouse for the remainder of the trial, after a freelancer journalist was stopped by the Kenosha Police Department for allegedly running a traffic signal behind a bus used to transport jurors to the courthouse. Police said they believed the man tried to photograph the bus.

NBC News said in a statement that the journalist did not intend to contact or photograph the jurors and is cooperating with authorities. Police said “there was no breach of security regarding the jury, nor were there any photographs obtained”.

Mr Rittenhouse, 18, was facing five felony charges for shooting three men in the aftermath of police brutality protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin on 25 August 2020. The most serious charges were first-degree homicide for the deaths of Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber.

Follow the latest updates live:

To receive our free breaking news alerts direct to your inbox click here

1637349819

Kyle Rittenhouse trial reaction: Roxane Gay says verdict ‘emboldens white supremacist vigilantes’

The Kyle Rittenhouse verdict on Friday has inspired a range of different responses. Star Trek actor George Takei tweeted: “Justice denied is a body blow to our national psyche. On trial was not only a killer, but a system that continues to kill. Today that system defeated true justice, once again. But mark these words: We will never stop fighting for what is right and just.”

Community star Yvette Nicole Brown also posted: The good news is that white men and boys can still kill whoever they want and do NO jail time! Isn’t that fun! And he killed white people! I bet little Kyle Rittenhouse is gonna go right out and take some more white power pics with The Proud Boys and plan his next massacre.”

The Independent’s Sam Moore is following all the reactions to the controversial ruling.

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 19:23

1637349339

Madison Cawthorn tells his supporters “be armed, be dangerous” after Rittenhouse verdict

Conservative congressman Madison Cawthorn reacted with evident glee at the not guilty verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial on Friday, offering the 18-year-old an internship and telling his supporters to “be armed, be dangerous, and be moral.”

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 19:15

1637348840

Kyle Rittenhouse collapses into seat and weeps after hearing not guilty verdicts

Kyle Rittenhouse collapsed into his chair and wept uncontrollably as the not guilty verdicts were read out in court on Friday.

Mr Rittenhouse, 18, became overcome with emotion at the conclusion of the three week trial as he was cleared of the homicide of Anthony Huber, 26 and Joseph Rosenbaum, 36. Mr Rittenhouse appeared to hyperventilate and embraced his lawyer Corey Chirafisi, before rushing out of the courtroom as Judge Brice Schroeder addressed the jury.

Bevan Hurley has the story.

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 19:07

1637347971

How the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse and tragedy in Kenosha captured toxic American politics

The Kyle Rittenhouse trial was the convergence of a number of toxic developments in American life. Despite assurances from Judge Bruce Schroeder that “this is not a political trial,” it’s hard to imagine a case that has inspired more political intrigue in recent years.

As The Independent’s Alex Woodward writes:Despite his insistence that the trial would not be political, politics and partisan influence dominated the case both inside and outside Judge Schroeder’s courtroom.

For more than a year, far-right media has fed their audience a false narrative that bolsters Mr Rittenhouse as a hero who stood up to their hyper-violent visions of “antifa” and Black Lives Matter protests in the wake of 2020 uprisings – and how “activist” prosecutors sought to make an example out of a “kid” who was unjustly arrested.

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 18:52

1637347322

Majorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz lead celebrations of Kyle Rittenhouse not guilty verdict

The Independent’s Eric Garcia has the latest from DC.

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 18:42

1637346795

New York mayor Bill de Blasio slams Kyle Rittenhouse verdict as ‘miscarriage of justice’

Bill de Blasio slammed the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict on Friday. The New York mayor said the fact that the 18-year-old was found not guilty on all counts after shooting three people amid Black Lives Matter protests was “a miscarriage of justice.”

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 18:33

1637346639

‘We are supporting any effort towards peaceful protests’ — Psaki says White House has been in touch with law enforcement amid Rittenhouse verdict

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on Friday said Biden administration officials have been in contact with Kenosha County officials amid the freshly announced verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial in support of ensuring that any protests remain peaceful.

Asked whether the White House had a reaction to the verdict, the press secretary said she would check with the president and issue a statement “as soon as we can”. Andrew Feinberg is following the latest in Washington on this story.

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 18:30

1637346406

WATCH: Kyle Rittenhouse breaks down as verdict read in Kenosha

Kyle Rittenhouse became visibly emotional on Friday when it was announced he was found not guilty on all counts in his homicide trial, after shooting three men in the aftermath of police brutality protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin on 25 August 2020.

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 18:26

1637346010

ICYMI: How long deliberation took in other high-profile cases

The Rittenhouse jury has been deliberating for a total of about 24 hours over three days.

Here’s a look at the length of time juries took to return a verdict in other high profile cases:

Derek Chauvin – It took a Minnesota jury just over 10 hours to find Mr Chauvin guilty of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and manslaughter in the death of George Floyd in April 2021

Jason Van Dyke – Illinois jurors took about seven and a half hours to convict Mr Van Dyke of second-degree murder in the death of Laquan McDonald in October 2018

George Zimmerman – It took about 16 and a half hours for a Florida jury to acquit Mr Zimmerman of second-degree murder in the death of Trayvon Martin in July 2013

Casey Anthony – Florida jurors deliberated for less than 11 hours before acquitting Ms Anthony in the death of her two-year-old daughter Caylee in July 2011

Harvey Weinstein – A New York jury deliberated for about 26 hours before finding Mr Weinstein on two of five criminal charges in February 2020

OJ Simpson – A California jury deliberated for less than four hours before acquitting Mr Simpson of murder charges in the death of his estranged wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman in 1995

Ted Bundy – A jury in Utah deliberated for less than seven hours before finding him guilty on two counts of murder, three counts of attempted murder and two counts of burglary

Charles Manson – Jurors in California deliberated for nearly 43 hours before finding Mr Manson and his followers guilty on 27 counts – including murder and conspiracy – in 1971

Megan Sheets19 November 2021 18:20

1637345983

Kyle Rittenhouse verdict: Shooter is found not guilty on all charges in homicide trial

Kyle Rittenhouse has been found not guilty on all five charges in his homicide trial.

The jury in the homicide trial of Kyle Rittenhouse reached a verdict after four days of deliberations.

Jurors began their fourth day of deliberations on Friday morning, after spending more than 24 hours over the previous three days working on the case. Rachel Sharp has the details on this stunning development.

Josh Marcus19 November 2021 18:19



Read original article here

Biden gets first physical as president, power transferred to VP Harris

It was a question that plagued Joe Biden’s presidential campaign: Could a 77-year-old man — who at age 78 would be the oldest person ever to assume the presidency — handle the rigors of the job?

Candidate Biden acknowledged it was legitimate for Americans to question his fitness for office.

“The only thing I can say is watch. Watch! Check my energy level, determine whether I know what I’m talking about,” he told voters during the 2020 campaign.

Now, on Friday, nearly a year into his term, Biden was getting his first physical as president at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland.

It comes the day before he turns 79.

Biden waved to reporters as he arrived at the hospital.

Shortly before, the White House revealed that for some of the exam he would be under anesthesia and would briefly transfer power to Vice President Kamala Harris.

“This morning, the President will travel to Walter Reed Medical Center for a routine physical. While he is there, the President will undergo a routine colonoscopy, ” press secretary Jen Psaki said in a statement.

“As was the case when President George W. Bush had the same procedure in 2002 and 2007, and following the process set out in the Constitution, President Biden will transfer power to the Vice President for the brief period of time when he is under anesthesia. The Vice President will work from her office in the West Wing during this time,” she said.

Around noontime, the White House said it sent letters at 10:10 a.m. to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Patrick Leahy, president pro tempore of the Senate, to inform them Biden was going under sedation. The House speaker is second in line to the presidency after the vice president and the president pro tempore of the Senate is third in line under the 25th Amendment dictating the order of presidential succession.

Psaki tweeted that Biden had spoken with Harris and chief of staff Ron Klain at approximately 11:35 a.m., saying “@POTUS was in good spirits and at that time resumed his duties.”

She said the White House would publicly release a written summary of the president’s physical Friday afternoon.

To date, the most recent physical and medical report was one his campaign released in December 2019: a three-page summary that declared Biden “a healthy, vigorous, 77-year-old male, who is fit to successfully execute the duties of the presidency.”

At the time, Biden was said to be under treatment for four different conditions: non-valvular atrial fibrillation — a type of irregular heart rhythm, hyperlipidemia — higher concentrations of fats or lipids in the blood, gastroesophageal reflux and seasonal allergies.

The most notable health incidents in Biden’s past were the two cranial aneurysms he suffered in 1988.

Since winning the presidency, Biden suffered a fractured foot after falling while chasing his dog Major at his Wilmington, Delaware, home last Thanksgiving. He had to wear a walking boot for the injury, and was said to be “healing as expected,” according to scans from a follow-up appointment in December.

Biden named Dr. Kevin O’Connor as his White House physician shortly after taking office.

O’Connor has served as Biden’s primary care physician since 2009, when he was appointed physician to the then-vice president. Biden chose him for the new role due to their long history and personal relationship, according to a White House official.

Questions about fitness for office are far from exclusive to Biden — President Donald Trump, who was the oldest president elected before Biden, also faced questions about his mental and physical fitness.

Trump faced particular scrutiny for the first physical of his administration in January 2018, which his then-White House physician, Dr. Ronny Jackson, said went “exceptionally well.”

He came under fire for his effusively rosy outlook on Trump’s health while briefing reporters afterward.

In other recent administrations, physicals have generally been conducted within a president’s first year in office.

President George W. Bush got a physical in August 2001, and was found to be “fit for duty” with “every reasonable expectation that he will remain fit for duty for the duration of his Presidency.”

President Barack Obama received his first physical in office just over a year into his presidency, in February 2010. He also was found to be in “excellent health,” although doctors told hi to stop smoking.

Read original article here

Biden nominates two picks to replace members of US Postal Service board

President BidenJoe BidenHouse Democrats push vote on social spending plan to Friday Fauci says all adults should ‘go get boosted’ Senate confirms Park Service director after years of acting heads MORE said Friday that he would not be renominating two Postal Service Board of Governors members, including its chairman, announcing two nominations to take their place.

A White House statement said that Biden is nominating former General Services Administration Administrator Daniel Tangherlini and e-commerce fulfillment start-up executive Derek Kan to fill the two spots. Tangherlini and Kan would be replacing chairman Ron Bloom and John Barger.

Those nominations now await Senate confirmation.

“The Postal Service congratulates Derek Kan and Dan Tangherlini on their nominations by the President to serve as Governors on the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service. We wish them well as they proceed through the United States Senate confirmation process,” the agency said in a statement.

“We thank Chairman Ron Bloom and Governor John Barger for their steady leadership and dedicated service to the Postal Service and the American people,” it continued. “We are grateful for their contributions to the development of the Postal Service’s Delivering for America 10-year plan to achieve financial sustainability and service excellence, and look forward to continuing to work with them as they serve out their terms.”

The Washington Post had reported earlier that the president was set to make an announcement on Friday that Bloom would not be renominated.

The newspaper, who spoke to three people familiar with the matter, reported that it signaled an uncertain future for Postmaster General Louis DeJoyLouis DeJoyPostal Service loss nearly halved DeJoy: Postal Service to add 45 facilities ahead of holiday season America is not delivering MORE, an ally of Bloom’s who has been viewed less favorably by Democrats and the White House.

Bloom was elected chairman of the Postal Service Board of Governors earlier this year after previously being appointed to the board in 2019 by former President TrumpDonald TrumpGOP Senate candidate says Fauci is ‘mass murderer,’ should be jailed rather than ‘hero’ Rittenhouse Overnight Health Care — Presented by Emergent Biosolutions — Pfizer, US strike COVID-19 pill deal On The Money — House Democrats ready to Build Back Better MORE.

Previously, he served as assistant to the president on manufacturing policy under the Obama administration.

Only the Board of Governors has the ability to remove DeJoy from his position, and the decision to not re-nominate Bloom could be a step in the direction toward shoring up enough votes to oust the postmaster general, according to the Post. 

DeJoy has faced calls to leave his post, especially amid concerns last year that issues at the agency could affect the delivery of larger numbers of mail-in ballots, driven in part by the pandemic.  

Biden press secretary Jen PsakiJen PsakiOn The Money — House Democrats ready to Build Back Better Harris’s communications director to depart next month White House tells businesses to move forward with vaccine mandate MORE did not directly answer a question in February regarding whether the White House was looking to have the postmaster general replaced but seemed to acknowledge the point. 

“I think the president is certainly familiar with the process,” she said at the time. “He believes the leadership can do better, and we are eager to have the board of governors in place.”

Updated at 11:33 a.m. 



Read original article here

House Democrats pass Biden’s social safety net expansion but major obstacles await in the Senate

The final tally was 220 to 213. Rep. Jared Golden of Maine was the only Democrat to vote against the bill and no Republicans voted for it.

The sweeping economic legislation stands as a key pillar of Biden’s domestic agenda. It would deliver on longstanding Democratic priorities by dramatically expanding social services for Americans, working to mitigate the climate crisis, increasing access to health care and delivering aid to families and children.

Democrats face a major challenge now that the bill has been approved by the House and must be taken up by the Senate, an effort that will put party unity to the ultimate test.

Senate Democrats have no margin of error to approve the legislation and key lawmakers — most prominently moderate West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin — have expressed concerns over elements of the plan as policy fights loom on the horizon.

What’s in the bill

The social safety net expansion plan, known as the Build Back Better Act, represents a central part of Biden’s policy agenda and an attempt by congressional Democrats to enact a major expansion of the social safety net.

The House and Senate recently passed, and Biden then signed into law, a separate $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure package, which marked a major legislative achievement for both parties.

The Build Back Better Act is an effort by Democrats to build on that investment in traditional infrastructure by making extensive investments to ramp up social programs and address the climate crisis.

Among its many provisions, the legislation would create a universal pre-K program, extend the enhanced child tax credit and expand access to health care, affordable housing and home care for seniors.

Democrats argue that the provisions in the bill are urgently needed and will widely benefit Americans. Republicans, meanwhile, have decried the legislation as a reckless and partisan tax and spending spree.

The Congressional Budget Office released its final scoring for the bill early Thursday evening, estimating that the package “would result in a net increase in the deficit totaling $367 billion,” according to a summary.

But the White House has worked to make the case that the bill will be fully paid for, despite the CBO analysis showing a shortfall.

The CBO analysis does not include revenue from tighter IRS enforcement. The CBO estimated earlier that would raise $207 billion.

The White House argues that increased IRS enforcement would actually raise more than what the CBO projects, meaning the bill would be fully paid for in their estimate.

Tough road ahead in the Senate

The legislation is expected to undergo major revisions in the Senate as Democrats who have expressed concerns over aspects of the package are likely to demand significant changes.

That would then require the House to vote again — on a final version of the legislation — in the coming weeks before it goes to Biden’s desk.

Senate Democrats need all 50 members of their caucus to support the bill in order to pass it under a budget process they are using to advance the measure without GOP votes known as reconciliation. That makes the task for Democrats particularly difficult since it means there can be no defections and passage will require total unity.

In an early sign of the impending efforts to change the bill, Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, said in a statement after the House vote that the Senate will “strengthen” the bill.

“I applaud Democrats in the House of Representatives for uniting to pass the Build Back Better Act. The Senate has an opportunity to make this a truly historic piece of legislation. We will listen to the demands of the American people and strengthen the bill,” Sanders tweeted.

Democrats pass bill after McCarthy’s marathon speech

Democrats have an extremely slim majority in the House and can only afford to lose three votes and still pass legislation. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer told CNN ahead of the vote that he only knew of one expected Democratic defection, which was Golden.

Golden told the Bangor Daily News on Thursday night he opposed the bill over provisions to raise the limit on state and local tax deductions, but did not rule out the possibility of backing the measure in future votes.

The House vote Friday morning came after McCarthy stalled floor action with a speech railing against Democrats that stretched into the early hours of Friday morning.

McCarthy took to the House floor at 8:38 p.m. ET on Thursday to begin speaking and did not finish speaking until eight hours and 32 minutes later, the longest House floor speech in the chamber’s history.

Hoyer announced shortly after midnight that the vote, which had been expected as soon as Thursday evening, would be postponed until later Friday.

“He wants to do it in the dead of night,” Hoyer said, referring to McCarthy. “We are going to do it in the day.”

This story and headline have been updated with additional developments Friday.

CNN’s Manu Raju and Sam Fossum contributed to this report.

Read original article here

House to vote on Build Back Better bill after Republican’s eight-hour speech – live | US news

The House of Representatives is in session and the members are wrapping up debate and some other business before intending to vote on the Build Back Better Act, the flagship piece of legislation of Joe Biden’s presidency so far.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is on her feet now, promising a brief speech, to weary giggles around the chamber.




Congressional Democrats tout ‘Build Back Better Act’ and climate investments during a Capitol Hill news conference in Washington on Wednesday. Nancy Pelosi is speaking. Photograph: Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters

Republican minority leader Kevin McCarthy spoke for a record 8.5 hours overnight. To be exact, Politico reports, he began his speech at 8.38pm on Thursday and didn’t stop until 5.10am this morning, thus missing the historic lunar eclipse.

Pelosi, in a white suit, is now going through some of the benefits of the legislation, promising to create good paying work. “Jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, a four-letter word,” Pelosi just said, to weak applause. It’s clear lawmakers are exhausted, but there are also whoops and smiles throughout the Democratic side of the aisle.

The bill is designed, per the speaker, to improve social protection programs, with more support for children, free preschool education for children under the age of five and paid family leave, in ground-breaking spending. And programs to mitigate the climate crisis.

But Senate moderate Democrat Joe Manchin is against including paid leave in the legislation and if the House passes this bill shortly it faces a fresh storm when it goes back to the upper chamber. Manchin already forced the removal of the most radical climate change program from the bill.

Senate Republicans are, so far, united against it. And Democrats Manchin of West Virginia and one of Arizona’s Democratic senators, Kyrsten Sinema, are expected to try to reduce its top-line total of almost $2tn.

So it has a way to go. But Democrats in the House are buoyant over a bill that has been months in the making and now appears about to pass.

Read original article here

Upper Midwest faces spike in COVID-19 infections: “It’s unprecedented”

The nation is currently facing an alarming COVID-19 spike, with average daily cases jumping 35% in recent weeks, according to the CDC. The upper Midwest has seen the largest surge in infections, with one doctor calling the situation “unprecedented.” 

“I have never seen so many people on a ventilator at one time,” said Dr. Joshua Huelster, a critical care physician at Abbott Northwestern Hospital in Minneapolis. 

Huelster’s ICU is full. The hospital system has 328 COVID patients, and most of the 66 ICU COVID patients are on ventilators. 

Huelster said the reason for the surge is clear: the unvaccinated. 

“The vast majority of patients that we see in the ICU are not vaccinated,” he said. 

COVID cases in Minnesota are up 47% in the last week compared to the week before. Hospital admissions jumped 24%, with the largest increase among those ages 30 to 49. 

Susan Rutten, who is not vaccinated, spent a week in a rural Minnesota hospital. 

“I feel bad taking up a bed if someone needs it worse than I do,” she said. She is now home, and said she plans to get the vaccine. 

As cases rise nationwide, CBS News has learned that the FDA is considering authorizing boosters for all adults for both Pfizer and Moderna as soon as Thursday. But just over 31% of the country is still unvaccinated. 

Huelster said he’s worried about the toll more COVID cases will take — not only on patients, but also on the staff that cares for them. 

“I’m not angry at people who don’t get vaccinated,” Huelster said. “Some of my colleagues get very angry about it. I’m not angry about it. I’m disappointed.” 

Read original article here

McCarthy slams Biden spending bill in marathon floor speech, delaying vote

House GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., spoke for over eight hours on the floor Thursday night and into Friday morning ahead of a crucial House vote, making his final case against the President Biden social spending bill that Republicans say will cause long-term damage to the U.S. economy.

In his scathing floor speech, McCarthy described the legislation as the “single most reckless and irresponsible spending bill in our nation’s history.” He criticized nearly every proposal included in the $1.75 trillion, dubbed the “Build Back Better Act,” as well as the Biden administration’s broader policies. The tactic effectively stalled a long-delayed final vote on the Democrat-backed legislation, with McCarthy stopping and starting on several occasions amid murmurs in the chamber.

McCarthy said Democratic lawmakers were “out of touch” with the needs and wishes of ordinary Americans. Republicans universally oppose the legislation, which they denounce as a fiscally irresponsible initiative that will exacerbate the inflation crisis, damage the long-term economy, and introduce to large a degree of socialism.

“Never in American history has so much been spent at one time,” McCarthy said. “Never in American history will so many taxes be raised and so much borrowing be needed to pay for all this reckless spending.”

BIDEN SPENDING BILL’S TAX ENFORCEMENT PLAN WOULD CAUSE AUDITS TO DOUBLE, GOP MEMO SAYS

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., pauses during a television interview as the House considers President Joe Biden’s $1.85 trillion-and-growing domestic policy package, at the Capitol in Washington, Friday, Nov. 5, 2021. (AP Photo/J. Sco (AP Newsroom)

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., moved forward with a vote after the Congressional Budget Office released its cost estimates for the legislation. The CBO found the bill would add $367 billion to the federal deficit through 2031. McCarthy’s speech eclipsed Pelosi’s 2018 marathon and became the longest speech ever delivered on the House floor.

The nonpartisan agency also found increased IRS tax enforcement would generate new revenue of $127 billion, far short of the White House’s projection of $400 billion. The CBO score raised doubts about the Biden administration’s claims that the bill’s costs are fully covered.

McCarthy described the IRS enforcement initiative as an expense of “billions of dollars to hire 87,000 IRS agents” who will be “going after Americans.” The House minority leader slammed various provisions included in the legislation, including the expanded child tax credit program.

In this image from House Television, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of Calif., speaks on the House floor during debate on the Democrats’ expansive social and environment bill at the U.S. Capitol on Thursday, Nov. 18, 2021, in Washington. (House (AP Newsroom)

He asserted the bill would result in higher prices for U.S.-made products, higher energy costs, immigration policies that will worsen an ongoing border crisis and “nationalized, Washington-centered education” at schools.

“From bank surveillance to bailouts, this bill takes the problems President Biden and Democrats have already created and makes them much, much worse,” McCarthy said.

The bill includes more than $550 billion in spending toward climate action, $400 billion toward child care and universal pre-K and $200 billion toward child tax and earned income tax credits. Biden and Democratic supporters say the legislation is a necessary overhaul that will modernize the U.S. economy.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

President Joe Biden speaks about his domestic agenda from the East Room of the White House in Washington, Thursday, Oct. 28, 2021. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh) (AP Photo/Susan Walsh / AP Newsroom)

McCarthy cited the recent Republican gubernatorial election win in Virginia and a tighter-than-expected race in New Jersey as proof that Americans were against the Democrats’ national legislative agenda.

The House is expected to vote on the spending bill Friday.

Read original article here

Seth Meyers Takes Down Paul Gosar, the GOP’s Most ‘Unhinged’ ‘Idiot’

It takes a lot these days to become the most odious Republican in Congress, but Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) got there this week after the House formally censured him for tweeting murder anime that targeted his colleague Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY).

While President Joe Biden signed the bipartisan infrastructure bill into law this week, Meyers explained that “Republicans spent their Wednesday defending one of their most unhinged members.” In his own defense, Gosar said that if he has to follow in the footsteps of Alexander Hamilton, who was the first member of Congress to face a censure vote, “then so be it, it is done.”

“I love when these idiots try to sound smart and adopt a defiant tone by using dramatic language like ‘so be it, it is done,’” Meyers replied. “You don’t sound like a Founding Father, you sound like Cousin Greg.”

And to Republicans “complaining that this is a waste of time,” the Late Night host said, “This whole thing would have been much easier and taken up much less time if you’d just been willing to step forward and say it was a deeply stupid tweet. But to be fair, he is a deeply stupid man.”

From there, Meyers broke down some of the worst defenses from the “dumbest people in politics,” including Louie Gohmert, Lauren Boebert, and Matt Gaetz. “Our political system can’t function like this,” he said, “where one party, for all its many flaws, tries to govern responsibly and the other wants to burn everything down.”

Meyers ultimately connected the dots all the way to the anti-Democracy movement on the right, because “the same people defending Gosar are the ones who tried to overturn the election on January 6th.” Ultimately, he said that there’s “no behavior too grotesque” for the GOP to defend, whether it’s Donald Trump endorsing the idea of melting down voting machines to make prison bars or Gosar’s “deeply stupid tweet.”

For more, listen and subscribe to The Last Laugh podcast.

Read original article here